Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

Discussion in 'Report A Scammer Archive' started by Alch, Jan 13, 2017.

Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft
  1. Unread #61 - Jan 14, 2017 at 7:06 PM
  2. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    The precedent you're setting is you can report anyone you want with 0 proof for your case other than asking the one you're reporting to prove something.
     
  3. Unread #62 - Jan 14, 2017 at 7:37 PM
  4. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    ^ Program and c0ngs like this.
  5. Unread #63 - Jan 14, 2017 at 8:40 PM
  6. Alch
    Joined:
    May 25, 2014
    Posts:
    5,538
    Referrals:
    711
    Sythe Gold:
    2,807
    Discord Unique ID:
    430514911865470977
    Discord Username:
    Alch#7777
    Two Factor Authentication User In Memory of Jon Tier 1 Prizebox

    Alch Previously known as Bogla
    Bogla_Man_Toilet Donor

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    I’ve never authorized the sale of the code, as Quid claims, to PieGP – I vouched him to develop his site (I recall there was a Sythe pm to Pie regarding this), and I later withdrew it as my involvement with Quid ceased after somebody with server access on Tokenbets generated ~5b tokens to withdraw on accounts via VPS’. He later contacted my domain host and had the Tokenbets URL reversed to him due to his name being on the registration, despite it being in my Godaddy account. He then listed it on Godaddy for >2K USD, forcing me to buy it before a competitor, or someone with malicious intent towards users bought it.

    That email also further confuses your stance in 2015 where you stated Joshua made the BoglaGold site, in defense of being reported for ban evasion and even before then you inquired asking me who made my site (Ihatequesting - ban evasion).

    One way or another, the report still comes down to judging between:

    · An inconsistent story, where you’re confused about who actually made the site until it was clear claiming you did was your only out of a situation where you would have to admit that the code wasn’t made by or for you.

    · Failure to show any evidence of writing any of the code (correspondence with Quid showing you made the majority?)

    · An email from an individual that shows clear dislike for me prior to the email being presented (as stated in my previous post), but does clarify Quid’s stance on the situation.

    · The actual code only having evidence of Quid being involved, and Quid’s service topic saying he does projects himself (and I assume he did Pie’s on his own).

    I do agree that this circular report has run its course now that we have the POV from all parties. I won't be allocating any more time to it unless new evidence needs to be addressed / added from either party. A judgement should be made by a moderator that accurately sets precedent for how future similar reports are handled.
     
    ^ Clegg, LooneyToon and Jerky like this.
  7. Unread #64 - Jan 14, 2017 at 8:44 PM
  8. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    So I've done everything in my power to prove what I said is true. You've made this report on me for stealing property you can't even show a contract for?

    I don't know what else you want me to do. I contact him he replies that it's mine to sell as much as his, confirming I didn't steal anything.

    You come up with another excuse as to why this isn't valid. I have nothing more to prove, you made a report with no proof.
     
  9. Unread #65 - Jan 14, 2017 at 8:48 PM
  10. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    Also, I thought you said he scammed you $2000? now it's suddenly 5b?
     
  11. Unread #66 - Jan 14, 2017 at 8:50 PM
  12. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    You've also yet to provide proof of a contract showing you have any grounds in this report. So, you can either provide it or don't and admit you actually have nothing?
     
  13. Unread #67 - Jan 15, 2017 at 6:25 PM
  14. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    The case still hinges on who, if anyone, owns the exclusive rights to the source code in question. That depends on what was agreed between the contractee (Bogla) and the contractor (the developer(s) who worked on the code).

    Without evidence of these contract terms the case can't proceed. Further, if no explicit terms were set determining exclusive rights then automatically the rights are non-exclusive. I.e. the developer would be free to reuse the source code in other projects.
     
    ^ LooneyToon and Lean like this.
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2017
  15. Unread #68 - Jan 15, 2017 at 8:17 PM
  16. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    In the case of front end code that is public and can be copied -- yes the burden would be on IHQ to prove he has rights to it. However in the case of private back end code there is only two ways to obtain it. Either you are given it or you hack a server and steal it.

    I don't believe anyone is claiming the source was taken via a hacking. Therefore the question is this: did whomever gave IHQ the source have the right to give it to him?

    This depends on who owns the rights to the source and whether those rights are exclusive rights. This depends on the agreement between Bogla and his developers.
     
  17. Unread #69 - Jan 15, 2017 at 9:05 PM
  18. MadDev
    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2017
    Posts:
    274
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    274

    MadDev Forum Addict

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    I'm still not fully understanding your argument here.

    You claim that Bogla doesn't have the rights to the code due to no contract claiming so, so the developer (Quid) has rights to distribute it to anyone he wants.

    Shouldn't this be implied? If I custom ordered some private code from a developer, I would assume this means that it is PRIVATE, and not for resale.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2017
  19. Unread #70 - Jan 15, 2017 at 9:27 PM
  20. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft


    If you order private code that would be implied and a contract would be written, you wouldn't just assume that. @Wintastical I posted proof I am a rightful owner of the code, Bogla hasn't posted proof stating otherwise or any kind of contract.
     
  21. Unread #71 - Jan 15, 2017 at 9:54 PM
  22. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    No I'm saying he doesn't automatically obtain exclusive rights unless the contract he has with his developer either explicitly states that he obtains exclusive rights or it is an employment contract.

    Copyright Ownership: Who Owns What?

    At this point I have no evidence as to what was agreed between Bogla and his developer. It could be anything from a complete exclusive reservation of copyright on Bogla's behalf to a simple non-exclusive license of a copyrighted product owned entirely by the developer.
     
    Last edited: Jan 15, 2017
  23. Unread #72 - Jan 15, 2017 at 10:06 PM
  24. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    @malakadang

    Your assessment of this case would be greatly appreciated.
     
    ^ Jerky, DesireX, Dave and 4 others like this.
  25. Unread #73 - Jan 16, 2017 at 4:08 AM
  26. malakadang
    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2011
    Posts:
    5,679
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    900
    Discord Unique ID:
    220842789083152384
    Discord Username:
    malakadang#3473
    Two Factor Authentication User Easter 2013 Doge Community Participant

    malakadang Hero
    malakadang Donor Retired Global Moderator

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    @Sythe I agree with you in 750 words.

    When a person has 'copyright' in a work, this means that they have the exclusive rights to that work (whatever those rights may be under law). Copyright infringement occurs when a third-party infringes on the copyright owner's exclusive rights. Accordingly, if Bogla is arguing that there has been copyright infringement, he must first show that he has 'copyright' in the work, such that he has exclusive rights which can be infringed. A person has 'copyright' in a work when they are its owner. Who is the owner in this case?

    There is an important distinction to be made between who is the author of the work, and who is the owner. For the most part the default position is that the author of the work is its first owner. There are three possibilities as to who is the author:
    1. Sole Author (Quid);
    2. Joint Authors (Quid & iHQ, etc)
    3. Orphan Work (this means there is no readily identifiable author.
    Although I know iHQ argues he was part of the creation, for the present, I will assume that Quid the sole author. This means, as the author, Quid is, by default, the owner of the copyright. This is why Bogla bears the burden of proof in showing that he owns the copyright (because by default, he does not own it, the author does: Quid). There are two main mechanisms Bogla may do this by:
    1. Bogla can argue that Quid was his employee (as opposed to an independent contractor); or
    2. Bogla can argue that, pursuant to a contract, the rights/ownership of the copyright was assigned (read given) to Bogla on its creation.
    I am not going to deal with the employee point - I very much suspect Quid was not an employee. The second point requires an agreement of some sort - a contract. If there is no satisfactory agreement, then the default position wins: Quid, the author, owns the copyright.

    I am assuming there is no acceptable contract/explicit agreement, what about an implied one as @MadDev suggested. In the absence of an agreement, the commissioner of the work (Bogla) may get an implied license to use the work for the purpose in which it was commissioned. Bogla would NOT get ownership of the work. This is how strict copyright is - it is a hurdle to argue you have an implied license, let alone arguing you own the work outright in the absence of an agreement/contract! I agree with what Sythe has said, and our analysis has lead to the same point: to know what rights and privileges Bogla has, we need information about what was agreed upon. In the absence of that information, the default position applies. Again, that is why Bogla bears the burden of proving he owns the copyright.

    As for iHQ. Assuming Quid was the sole author of the work, if iHQ used his code (without a license/permission), then iHQ would be infringing on Quid's copyright. Bogla would not be a relevant party to this infringement. This screenshot suggests that Quid (assuming he is the owner of the copyright) probably wouldn't care that iHQ is using it, or has been using it. This presumed authorization essentially gets iHQ off the hook. If iHQ was a joint author, then this would not be a problem in the first instance (unless Bogla owned the copyright pursuant to a contract/agreement).

    Now I know a lot of you are thinking this is Sythe.org not a country. Nevertheless, at law, in the countries that I know of, Bogla would be placed in the same situation as he is now: he needs to show evidence of an agreement. However, given that we are a website, I don't think we can expect an air-tight contract with hundreds of clauses. We can use our discretion however, to determine what facts amount to an acceptable level of agreement between Bogla and Quid for Bogla to own the copyright - it wouldn't have to be signed and in writing for example (that would be too strict), as it the requirement in Australia. What level of agreement I'm not sure of, and it is something we can all weigh in on. However, at present we don't know what was agreed upon between Bogla and Quid. So accordingly, @Bogla please post any screenshots, chats, etc, of all correspondence you had with Quid regarding the creation of the website for you.
     
    ^ You are 0 hp, Macho, Hahanerd and 11 others like this.
  27. Unread #74 - Jan 16, 2017 at 4:27 AM
  28. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    Thank you for your insight and clear reasoning.

    With reference to the last paragraph: we're a private club and we provide a (free) dispute resolution service for disputes arising between our members. We follow a common law standard for these disputes. As such the elements of a contract are the standard common law elements: Offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, consideration and capacity. The agreement doesn't need to be in any particular form, it just needs all of the elements.
     
    ^ Macho, Meghan, Fingy and 7 others like this.
  29. Unread #75 - Jan 17, 2017 at 5:49 PM
  30. Alch
    Joined:
    May 25, 2014
    Posts:
    5,538
    Referrals:
    711
    Sythe Gold:
    2,807
    Discord Unique ID:
    430514911865470977
    Discord Username:
    Alch#7777
    Two Factor Authentication User In Memory of Jon Tier 1 Prizebox

    Alch Previously known as Bogla
    Bogla_Man_Toilet Donor

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    I did find an old laptop and a previously locked skype (live:boglamanagement) that contained logs from December 17th-20th. Sorry about the cellphone quality of these pictures.

    Initial offer from him to make a website + time estimate & price :


    Gyazo - c05ea267c2b2577c279958bd634ca9ee.jpg

    Some discussion regarding the site previous to the one he made :


    Gyazo - 5da929f99526d81868a8f3c2c54e22a3.jpg


    Gyazo - 0e2838be357cc325f3e8933f17ff21c8.jpg

    Talk regarding new site “I need something that I can call my own” & agreement to that statement:


    Gyazo - 0cd899f06a528a0a8d8dcc7f7c38e68b.jpg


    Gyazo - de2a1cf5683acf6400a644ada698be22.jpg


    Gyazo - 6bd186b50aca2fb01a2b44197da193a5.jpg

    Further discussion & initiation of a To-Do on Basecamp :


    Gyazo - d24695c29eb4adda35cd9d4f0e6f174c.jpg


    Gyazo - 951868e5168c57cd3f32774cc8052703.jpg

    (email censored)


    Gyazo - 65ec50c9765789ea355009d16ff30e90.jpg

    Renegotiation of price :


    Gyazo - 40b18c9e4f59e4657b7126e1ba38b995.jpg

    I also found some emails from basecamp on an email corresponding to when he posted something on basecamp, and an email from him regarding a To-Do. Note that at the bottom of the emails it says that the email was only sent to Quid & I/brother (P G) & not a second developer, nor was a second developer mentioned throughout the entire process of designing the site – all of which can be seen in the pictures. We were removed from the basecamp so only the emailed updates remain.

    Gyazo - 3ec12728db4c1e48245508e0246d802d.png


    Gyazo - b65218a638b36c7ba978e5eefcade461.png


    Gyazo - c0a8d687a7677328214f3f8ecf766363.png


    Gyazo - 00e7dc98e6673f8764c4d91d1a518f43.png

    Gyazo - 754770e1bdee2e02cc607039f52d0581.png


    Gyazo - b06ea7ab5c42c7fdde4269fa1ee72498.png


    Gyazo - cf2cb003dca8a6ca5b3936f83e5d6a31.png


    Gyazo - 428a9ff4263f9660de6a65437304a428.png


    Gyazo - 56b1603a5e383ccc75f9bddcb0c5b469.png


    Gyazo - f68831a0ba05981e116099ed37a8d9af.png


    Gyazo - cda0bad94575d0aae6722efd2ff33bb5.png


    Gyazo - 0f5db1d83cadd5757c9397be28ab6f89.png


    Gyazo - 76dff4ecac9ba7b96995f2b174564145.png


    Gyazo - 4ddac4b2ffd06e5479032cb702c25344.png


    Gyazo - fecd94264e3b317d568858528d902304.png


    Gyazo - 01ecdb3953bb3603bc9beb575d32208d.png


    Gyazo - 2d89d2ec9a80ed87155b9866458442c3.png


    Gyazo - 4cccf2f294a912fe96fd8cb6c94b8df5.png


    Gyazo - af9aec2d2cb8248296de88f42301929a.png


    Gyazo - 366783ddf8850a81a503e8f9affc51a5.png


    Gyazo - 058f927ca882b46b4a5d0c3f38d6906a.png


    Gyazo - f0dcf4aa7b7abece88f42f57d33a9905.png


    Gyazo - 12e81111b0ea4dfc6f92b7acaf76a16b.png


    Gyazo - 9c4008cfbc89933fd93f3bad62f47138.png


    Gyazo - 9db1e0f1b5f221114bc35ba1a929ea24.png


    Gyazo - d08636ceac45686306930ebc5402fa86.png


    Gyazo - 9714cee853bbe0583312503102b26535.png


    https://gyazo.com/14f414a037fa9763302a9f113f612627


    https://gyazo.com/860487a1d91571350df248059c9f5775


    https://gyazo.com/737b72975ba07fff5fb087cf95cfccf3


    https://gyazo.com/64eb4c4f79bf355f252e5709e8d5eb96


    https://gyazo.com/b1d33387437abfe3ff87e97e87f3d97a



    https://gyazo.com/5994e67ca17b459334116549e8b36ff8


    https://gyazo.com/3f5d30467ec6adbe9196594b1cbc0513


    https://gyazo.com/e847d058eb7584788db9e5fd39bd008a


    https://gyazo.com/318c67eb2d83149c3dd841c1063e7449


    https://gyazo.com/302173ea01df2ba9921be10d25eddcf8


    https://gyazo.com/6d4856f3b903673d9ab7c6c295b46917

    NOTE: There is also daily recaps such as https://gyazo.com/b1ab1467e801acd0177a696244fc0047 that can be used to ensure I’m not omitting any details, and if required, I can be teamviewed to review all of the recaps.
     
    ^ Macho, Agnostic, Meghan and 2 others like this.
  31. Unread #76 - Jan 17, 2017 at 6:00 PM
  32. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    It seems clear to me that in terms of authorship of the code it was a joint effort, which would mean automatically without any other information copyright would vest in both of you.

    However you do have as part of the agreement that idiom "to call my own".

    This could be read down to mean "custom" or read up to mean "custom and exclusive to me".

    @malakadang what do you think?
     
    ^ Program likes this.
  33. Unread #77 - Jan 17, 2017 at 6:12 PM
  34. iHateQuesting
    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2015
    Posts:
    9,882
    Referrals:
    27
    Sythe Gold:
    1,109

    iHateQuesting Hero

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    You are taking "call it my own" out of context. You're clearly talking about the "personal feel" to the front end of the website as the first one was a copy paste of someone elses website (I believe Divica). In no way would someone take this as "yeah, i'd like all ownership of the rights and code".
     
  35. Unread #78 - Jan 17, 2017 at 6:17 PM
  36. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    It can be read up or read down as I said above.
     
  37. Unread #79 - Jan 17, 2017 at 6:21 PM
  38. Sythe
    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2005
    Posts:
    8,025
    Referrals:
    419
    Sythe Gold:
    4,988
    Discord Unique ID:
    742989175824842802
    Discord Username:
    Sythe
    Dolan Duck Dolan Trump Supporting Business ???
    Poképedia
    Clefairy Jigglypuff
    Who did this to my freakin' car!
    Hell yeah boooi
    Tier 3 Prizebox Toast Wallet User
    I'm LAAAAAAAME Rust Player Mewtwo Mew Live Free or Die Poké Prizebox (42) Dat Boi

    Sythe Join our discord

    test

    Administrator Village Drunk

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    That said:
    It should probably be read down according to common law doctrine.
     
  39. Unread #80 - Jan 17, 2017 at 6:33 PM
  40. Alch
    Joined:
    May 25, 2014
    Posts:
    5,538
    Referrals:
    711
    Sythe Gold:
    2,807
    Discord Unique ID:
    430514911865470977
    Discord Username:
    Alch#7777
    Two Factor Authentication User In Memory of Jon Tier 1 Prizebox

    Alch Previously known as Bogla
    Bogla_Man_Toilet Donor

    Ihatequesting - Intellectual Property Theft

    The comment was in reference to a situation where RS3Goldmart used Dialatic’ code to make my website, explained here - RS3GoldMart stole my design that I wasn’t happy with. It was ruled that I would have 3 weeks to vacate the design and I would be refunded the $200. The reference to the 3 weeks is shown in the Skype picture. Quid was fully aware of the RS3Goldmart situation (see the pictures in my previous post under the “Some discussion regarding the site previous to the one he made”heading) and he was helping me to secure the previous website while I was on vacation in Portugal and while he was designing the new website. The RS3Goldmart report (dated December 17th) gives context as to what information both Quid & I were speaking in regards to.

    I think it's clear that I didn't want to share code with another gold seller, and I believe Quid's agreement to the statement is what should be analyzed while keeping the information he was aware of in mind.
     
    ^ Fingy, John and JSand like this.
    Last edited: Jan 17, 2017
< cachito123 | Loco NH >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site