- Joined
- Dec 12, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 874
Okay, I can't come in here with the debating skills of your caliber, but I have a point that has made me curious...
The Law of Conservation of Energy, a law which much of our times science is based off of, states that energy can be neither created or destroyed.
If the Law of Conservation of Energy says no energy can be created, how does one explain everything around us? To say that it "was just always there." is a cop out that would be shot down if someone were to say "God was just always there."
If logic is based off of science, what happens when science disproves itself? What becomes of what we call logical?
(Note, if I am missing something from the Law of Conservation, the term "logic", or any other point I have brought up, feel free to tell me. I made this post not to debate, but to hear how you explain this. This post is more so I can learn the other half...)
I believe an infinitely existing universe is the simpler explanation according to Occum's razor than an infinitely existing God. Regardless, physics theories have little application towards a creation theory - namely because the properties of physics were nonexistent before creation. That is to say, thing as simple as gravity, were only formed POST "creation" point.
Science is based off finding the most rational explanation for a given event. It acknowledges that itself is subject to a better explanation or even to error. This is how religion and science differ.





