Trinity19
Forum Addict
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2010
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 590
Can you show me these supposed "hypocrisies" in the bible? I've seen people mention them too many times without provided proof. Don't make statements based on hearsay.
The examples in the bible aren't as much as hypocrisies as they are just incredibly illogical happenings. I mean take the holy trinity for example and correlate that to the event timeline of- Adam and eve with the apple, the conception of jesus, and the death of jesus. I just love how god gave life to himself to make himself sacrifice himself in the name of himself for the sake of pleasing himself so he himself could undo an original sin he created....yeah say that 3 times fast.
The only hypocrisy i can see right away is how this "good" and "merciful" god actually does most of the slaughtering in the bible compared to his "evil" and "vengeful" counterpart.
There was no religions in the beginning. That is why christianity is not considered a religion. It is another word for Disciple of Christ.
Other religions were created by people who have died in the past. Christianity is based on an almighty God.
Exactly as Jimmy stated this is purely your opinion and thus can't be used as fact.
And what? No religions in the beginning?
1.) There are records of hundreds of religions before Christianity came into play, while they atleast made more sense and relied on deifying the elements and the sun because they had atleast some tangible form.Religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of life and the universe.
2.) The story of Jesus Christ isn't even close to being original, there are recordings of similar timeliness occurring in countless other prophets. Hell, the life story of Horus (Egyptian, so way before Christianity) is almost an exact duplicate, from the birth to the number of years he spent doing everything.
So pretty much the story of Jesus Christ is just the world's oldest repost.
Catholics still believe in God. But they use priests as their "messengers" because people do not believe that God will hear them. So they need a priest to do it for them.
I can agree with atheists on one thing. That the world is very corrupt because of all of these false religions created by man. With all due respect.
Atheists always fall back on their logic when presented with the argument that God exists. Their logic which they got from previous atheists...this does not make any sense to me because you say the exact same thing about the bible.
1.) Yeah but the only problem with priests and these "messengers" is because it's not just recently the religion has been corrupt its always been corrupt becuase that's what religion is. Formed from an idea that is used to play on the masses conscious and unconscious fear of death and the afterlife.
So it's not these fake religions, its religion itself that causes this internal conflict, not one specific religion but the idea of it as a whole.
2.) Wait wait wait wait WHAT???
I can't believe i even read this...well first of all by stating atheist's have to revert to logic to face an argument god exists is basically you saying that your side of the argument is thus illogical.Atheists always fall back on their logic when presented with the argument that God exists.
We use logic because that is the basis of truth. With logic we can compromise a situation and accept its discrepancies while still proving its validity. With faith and "god's will" there is no medium because any sort of compromise will be the religions downfall and thus disprove it.
3.)
Their logic which they got from previous atheists...this does not make any sense to me because you say the exact same thing about the bible.
I'm confused are you saying it's bad to bounce ideas off other people and work together?
Take a look at this article and tell me that this is not solid proof that the bible is a REAL book http://debate.org.uk/topics/history/bib-qur/bibmanu.htm. I'll be expecting some statements like "That does not prove that God is real!" On the contrary. Jesus died and rose again. That is recorded in the bible. No one can die a death like Jesus and raise themselves from the grave like he did. Only God can cheat death. There is your proof that God exists. Solid evidence that the bible, word for word, was written like a history book. Except this history book holds the truth. The words of God.
1.) The bible is a real book, there's alot of good fiction out there especially Stephen King =D but in all seriousness, you can fight to say the bible is a real book, but that still doesn't help you with the fact that ITS NOT THE REAL BIBLE the bible has been changed and reversed countless times to fit the agenda of the kings and warlords that were held in power because it's alot more convincing to the uneducated masses to say "It is god's will and here is proof" and they would have to believe it since they couldn't read it if their lives depended on it.
2.) The whole resurrection concept again eh...we can't say with full confidence he was raised from the dead as there are many other possiblities to what could have happened.
(Just a little side note to anyone who reads this: There's a movie called 'The man from earth' WATCH THIS, it is amazing and gives a good explanation to this whole argument. Such an amazing movie with such a low budget)
2a.) So if the resurrection did happen, is that your only actual form of evidence that god exists? Because if that's it and everything else is up to speculation and faith then your side doesn't have a very strong support section.
2b.) Since the bible is written by certain individuals 'perception' of the event then this can hardly be taken a complete fact. Hell even lawyers hate having witnesses most of the time because witnesses are impartial to their own viewpoint.
There's an example of this I can't remember it exactly but it goes something like this: If there's a car accident at an intersection and theres a person at each corner of the sidewalk where it happened, each one will have their own version of the accident and what happened.
So the people who believed him to be some sort of deity will write him as such, and those who don't weren't even allowed to have their view in the bible, or they crucified him XD
Ill end this with a quote by Epicurus:
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?”




