• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Teleportation Achievable?

Two Factor Authentication User
i doubt its ever gonna be possible, except for in runescape

It's already achieved. Only teleporting a small particle (photon) though.
 
It's already achieved. Only teleporting a small particle (photon) though.

It is not teleportation it is entanglement there is a difference.
 
I know they're different but the idea of teleportation that we achieved was through quantum entanglement

Entanglement is not teleportation.

Its like me saying this is an ice cube while holding a bucket of water. It is similar in that we are moving data around however all we are really doing is duping a change.


Simpler example

Picture this you are on your computer you move a text file just saying AAA from your C drive to the desktop it teleports to the desktop instantly.

Entanglement would be like you have 2 text documents and you add AAA to one and it adds to the other.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Entanglement is not teleportation.

Its like me saying this is an ice cube while holding a bucket of water. It is similar in that we are moving data around however all we are really doing is duping a change.


Simpler example

Picture this you are on your computer you move a text file just saying AAA from your C drive to the desktop it teleports to the desktop instantly.

Entanglement would be like you have 2 text documents and you add AAA to one and it adds to the other.

Wait so you're saying entanglement is like joining both text documents?
 
Wait so you're saying entanglement is like joining both text documents?

Entanglement is combining two then the change will appear on both then disappear milliseconds after it is observed in both locations

They tried to call it teleportation but its really just kinda like a bug in our universe lol.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Entanglement is combining two then the change will appear on both then disappear milliseconds after it is observed in both locations

They tried to call it teleportation but its really just kinda like a bug in our universe lol.

What I understand from your explanation of Entanglement is combining the two then duplicating it? And does both of them disappear?
 
What I understand from your explanation of Entanglement is combining the two then duplicating it? And does both of them disappear?

Yes the change appears for a small amount of time then disappears on both.

No one really completely knows why.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Yes it should be possible, but the real issue is whether or not the teleported person would be the same as the one before teleportation.
(because of the disassembling and reassembling of each individual atom)
 
I saw a discovery channel docu on this once like long time ago they talked about how you have to send each particle or something and sometimes if you were to do it you can get messed up like the particles gets messed up or they don't send over and like you die, i probably sound like a idiot but i remember the documentary talkin about something along the lines of what i said very poorly :p
 
I think I've read somewhere about teleportation:

It might be possible, but for that you need to move an object from one place to another without moving it actually. So, it breaks down the object A from point M and rebuilds it again on point N. If that's the case in humans, does it mean that it's killing and breaking down human on point M to go to point N?
 
Two Factor Authentication User
I think I've read somewhere about teleportation:

It might be possible, but for that you need to move an object from one place to another without moving it actually. So, it breaks down the object A from point M and rebuilds it again on point N. If that's the case in humans, does it mean that it's killing and breaking down human on point M to go to point N?

That's similar to entanglement, yes.

So far, our race has only been capable of teleporting a single atom. Let alone a human lol.
 
I think I've read somewhere about teleportation:

It might be possible, but for that you need to move an object from one place to another without moving it actually. So, it breaks down the object A from point M and rebuilds it again on point N. If that's the case in humans, does it mean that it's killing and breaking down human on point M to go to point N?

Teleportation is not will not and cannot happen in our universe it is impossible.

Closest thing we have is entanglement which not only is not teleportation both particles also get destroyed after the change is applied.


What could be possible (but not confirmed) would be if we could somehow enter the 4th dimension to travel to another place very fast this would not be teleportation but it would be helpful.


Teleportation would not have anythign to do with destroying a person and rebuilding them I wanna say even if we could destroy and recreate the entire structure of a human (which would also mean we could make exact replica) it wouldn't work all living things have energy aura's around them just atoms of the same elements would not make a living creature.


Think of it kinda like the Anime Full Metal Alchemist we can make all the elements of living creatures we know everything they are yet we cannot make life.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Teleportation is not will not and cannot happen in our universe it is impossible.

Closest thing we have is entanglement which not only is not teleportation both particles also get destroyed after the change is applied.


What could be possible (but not confirmed) would be if we could somehow enter the 4th dimension to travel to another place very fast this would not be teleportation but it would be helpful.


Teleportation would not have anythign to do with destroying a person and rebuilding them I wanna say even if we could destroy and recreate the entire structure of a human (which would also mean we could make exact replica) it wouldn't work all living things have energy aura's around them just atoms of the same elements would not make a living creature.


Think of it kinda like the Anime Full Metal Alchemist we can make all the elements of living creatures we know everything they are yet we cannot make life.

I gotta give props to this guy because he DOES have a point.

The stuff you were saying about the 4th Dimension; I'm interested so I'm gonna do some research and come back.
 
[youtube]BWyTxCsIXE4[/youtube]

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ca4miMMaCE[/youtube]

M Thoery states there are atleast 10 Dimensions + Time
 
Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble here, but all these "neo" physics theories are complete bullshit. Quantum entanglement, multiple dimensions, string theory, etc. are all a bunch of hoopla. Don't waste your time reading about them on the Internet.
 
Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble here, but all these "neo" physics theories are complete bullshit. Quantum entanglement, multiple dimensions, string theory, etc. are all a bunch of hoopla. Don't waste your time reading about them on the Internet.

Care to explain how these theories are all bullshit?

Multiple Dimensions & Entanglement are perfectly logical I guess you can argue string theory however its incomplete its not finished yet there is still work to be done. Entanglement is fact its been done and proven.


Multiple Dimensions isn't exactly science yet but its not exactly far fetched. I mean just a few years ago no one really took multiverse theory seriously now look at it it has lots of support in the scientific community.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Don't mean to burst anyone's bubble here, but all these "neo" physics theories are complete bullshit. Quantum entanglement, multiple dimensions, string theory, etc. are all a bunch of hoopla. Don't waste your time reading about them on the Internet.

Do you have any statements regarding your defense of bullshit?

Please explain further why these physics theories are "complete bullshit". They are pretty logical to me. Explain why quantum entanglement is bullshit to start off.
 
Care to explain how these theories are all bullshit?

Multiple Dimensions & Entanglement are perfectly logical I guess you can argue string theory however its incomplete its not finished yet there is still work to be done. Entanglement is fact its been done and proven.


Multiple Dimensions isn't exactly science yet but its not exactly far fetched. I mean just a few years ago no one really took multiverse theory seriously now look at it it has lots of support in the scientific community.

No no, let me rephrase. These theories have absolutely no application to the real life. Entanglement is only observed with things like the polarization of one photon instantaneously affecting that of another. There's nothing super mystical about it. At the end of the day, information CANNOT and WILL NOT ever be able to travel faster than the speed of light. All these ideas of teleportation, quantum internet, etc. are ideas made by the general public, by a misunderstanding of the importance of certain scientific theories.

Perhaps I should have said "backing up your fantasy-related ideas by using neo-scientific theories is bullshit".

Do you have any statements regarding your defense of bullshit?

Please explain further why these physics theories are "complete bullshit". They are pretty logical to me. Explain why quantum entanglement is bullshit to start off.

First thing, if they appear "logical", it does not mean they are a truth. Second thing, quantum entanglement is not very logical - we really don't know how to explain why it happens. We just know that it does happen. I'm not arguing that it's not a fact.

And finally, you picked on only quantum entanglement. I spoke about other options such as string theory, multiple universes, multiple dimensions, worm holes, dark energy... all of this is a bunch of hoopla in the sense that they cannot be used for making fantasy-related phenomena a reality. No, quantum entanglement will not make us able to have super fast internet. No, worm holes will not make time travel possible. No, multiple dimensions will not make teleportation possible. Do you see what I'm trying to say?
 
Back
Top