• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Why is space travel being ignored?

Haha.

1, Fuel won't be a problem soon, alternative resources will be used. It will be the same cost.

2. What the hell. Its called the hubble telescope. Wheres the atmosphere there..
 
Member of the Month Winner
Sythe's 10th Anniversary
I hope you people realize that after having someone live in space for an amount of time, them returning to earth would be practically suicide.

In other words, the lack of gravity would make their bones brittle, and therefore returning to Earth would likely result in very ... unfavourable consequences.
 
Swan, That is true on spaceships, but I read somewhere that if there was an orbiting space colony, the spin on it would create a fake gravity, maybe something can even be invented to put this on space ships, or something
 
maybe they found something they don't wan us to know about so theu are silently slowely trying to figure things out with aliens. The economy is just a small thing. look at the bigger picture, we need to make friends with ET beings.

http://ufocasebook.conforums.com/index.cgi?board=moon&action=display&num=1115439796

And for all you people complaining about poverty, its not the U.S job to bailout everyone. FDR created a government in which people are to dependent on our governemnt. health care, Social security, unemployment. All things that are bad for government. all this shit equals higher taxes and less money.

Hey, its not my fault u cant get a decent job that has health care and a 401k cuz u felt like doing drugs in high school and not learning. Why the fuck should i pay for your healthcare, and food stamps.
 
Sythe Awards 2010 Winner
Sythe Awards 2011 Winner
Spam Forum Participant
PHP Shit Show 2k26
Rust Player
We have more troubles on earth as in Starvation, Ozone layers being destroyed, Economy crisis.
 
space travel is ridiculous. the fastest speed is that of the speed of light. If u truly understanad or could comprehend the vastness of space or how it contnually expands you would realize space travel is useless. Even if it was possible the time to reach other galaxies would be far greater than wat it seems. look on the discovery channel and they will break some of it down. in the end it is eons before we as humans could trly touch or grasp the technology or mind to understand that of TRUE space and time
 
Since B.C. times, people have wanted to explore, People wanted to discover the earth and they did, people went to the poles, discovered the ocean, because they wanted to know. Then in the 60s, the we went to the moon, at the speed we were then, we could be on mars by 2000. Then, space died... Ever since the 70s, no one seems to care. What happened to wanting to know whats out there? Space is the final frontier, space is right above our heads......

Just think about it, if NASA had continued being supported, think how much farther we would be right now, I mean we wouldn't be out of our solar system, but maybe an outpost on mars? Probably a decent colony on the moon?

It bugs me how people just don't care, it bugs me that I was born in this period of time, because nothing important is going on in the space frontier. I really want to focus part of my life on exploring space, but I don't think thats going to happen at this rate.

NASA at best won't land on the moon again until 2030 in my opinion, I think our only chance is for private corporations.

Do you think the final frontier is being ignored?

It's a great point, but financially it isn't worth tax payers dollars. There is plenty that can be studied from here on Earth (be it with older samples, space telescopes, lunar rovers, etc). We will eventually get back there, it's just been put on the back burner for the time being until the world's economy stabilizes.
 
If you are rich, you think now. Some people work 10 Hours a day plus, and get like $10 Dollars the day.

Why spend more money when economy is flooding.
 
Getting fucked over and nuked becuase of neglecting the world > shooting rockets into space for billions of dollars

Because NASA's functionality is directly related to neglectance of the world?

And since when would any amount of neglectance get us nuked?
 
Because NASA's functionality is directly related to neglectance of the world?

And since when would any amount of neglectance get us nuked?


I'm being sarcastic, sorry if i came on strong.

We need to take care of our current problems before we start experimenting with something new.
 
I'm being sarcastic, sorry if i came on strong.

We need to take care of our current problems before we start experimenting with something new.

Maybe something new could lead us out of recession, managing more jobs than anyone could ever imagine.
It could be like WW2
 
TJ, you mean like instead of building weapons though, we build "spacecraft"?

If thats your idea, I like it,a big "star Trek" sapcecraft, but before that, we have to find a better engine system
 
TJ, you mean like instead of building weapons though, we build "spacecraft"?

If thats your idea, I like it,a big "star Trek" sapcecraft, but before that, we have to find a better engine system

It could lead to an array of jobs.

We really should be focusing our eyes towards alternate energy for everyday items, so we could end up doing something for spacecraft also.
 
Why spend more money when economy is flooding.
because work is now cheaper. And, if you pay someone he'll buy food and other items and pay for someones wages, who wil buy something... If everyone stopped all shopping, because scare from having none in future, economy would fail and if recover it'll tak too much time
 
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9355479/
WASHINGTON - NASA briefed senior White House officials Wednesday on its plan to spend $100 billion and the next 12 years building the spacecraft and rockets it needs to put humans back on the Moon by 2018.

The U.S. space agency now expects to roll out its lunar exploration plan to key Congressional committees on Friday and to the broader public through a news conference on Monday, Washington sources tell SPACE.com.

U.S. President George W. Bush called in January 2004 for the United States to return to the Moon by 2020 as the first major step in a broader space exploration vision aimed at extending the human presence throughout the solar system.
Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad here

NASA has been working intensely since April on an exploration plan that entails building an 18-foot (5.5-meter) blunt body crew capsule and launchers built from major space shuttle components including the main engines, solid rocket boosters and massive external fuel tanks.

That plan, called the Exploration Systems Architecture Study, was presented by NASA Administrator Mike Griffin, his space operations chief Bill Gerstenmaier and several other senior agency officials Wednesday afternoon to senior White House policy officials, including an advisor to U.S. Vice President Richard Cheney and the president’s Deputy National Security Advisor J.D. Crouch.

NASA’s plan, according to briefing charts obtained by SPACE.com, envisions beginning a sustained lunar exploration campaign in 2018 by landing four astronauts on the Moon for a seven-day stay.

The expedition would begin, these charts show, by launching the lunar lander and Earth departure stage (essentially a giant propulsion module) on a heavy-lift launch vehicle that would be lifted into orbit by five space shuttle main engines and a pair of five-segment shuttle solid rocket boosters.

Once the Earth departure stage and lunar lander are safely in orbit, NASA would launch the Crew Exploration Vehicle capsule atop a new launcher built from a four-segment shuttle solid rocket booster and an upper stage powered by a single space shuttle main engine.

The CEV would then dock with the lunar lander and Earth departure stage and begin its several day journey to the moon.

NASA’s plan envisions being able to land four-person human crews anywhere on the Moon’s surface and to eventually use the system to transport crew members to and from a lunar outpost that it would consider building on the lunar south pole, according to the charts, because of the regions elevated quantities of hydrogen and possibly water ice.

One of NASA’s reasons for going back to the moon is to demonstrate that astronauts can essentially “live off the land” by using lunar resources to produce potable water, fuel and other valuable commodities. Such capabilities are considered extremely important to human expeditions to Mars which, because of the distances involved, would be much longer missions entailing a minimum of 500 days spent on the planet’s surface.

NASA’s Crew Exploration Vehicle is expected to cost $5.5 billion to develop, according to government and industry sources, and the Crew Launch Vehicle another $4.5 billion. The heavy-lift launcher, which would be capable of lofting 125 metric tons of payload, is expected to cost more than $5 billion but less than $10 billion to develop, according to these sources.

NASA’s plan also calls for using the Crew Exploration Vehicle, equipped with as many as six seats, to transport astronauts to and from the international space station. An unmanned version of the Crew Exploration Vehicle could be used to deliver a limited amount of cargo to the space station.

NASA would like to field the Crew Exploration Vehicle by 2011, or within a year of when it plans to fly the space shuttle for the last time. Development of the heavy lift launcher, lunar lander and Earth departure stage would begin in 2011. By that time, according to NASA’s charts, the space agency would expect to be spending $7 billion a year on its exploration efforts, a figure projected to grow to more than $15 billion a year by 2018, that date NASA has targeted for its first human lunar landing since Apollo 17 in 1972.
© 2009 Space.com. All rights reserved. More from Space.com.

It's not like they don't care.
 
Since B.C. times, people have wanted to explore, People wanted to discover the earth and they did, people went to the poles, discovered the ocean, because they wanted to know. Then in the 60s, the we went to the moon, at the speed we were then, we could be on mars by 2000. Then, space died... Ever since the 70s, no one seems to care. What happened to wanting to know whats out there? Space is the final frontier, space is right above our heads......

Just think about it, if NASA had continued being supported, think how much farther we would be right now, I mean we wouldn't be out of our solar system, but maybe an outpost on mars? Probably a decent colony on the moon?

It bugs me how people just don't care, it bugs me that I was born in this period of time, because nothing important is going on in the space frontier. I really want to focus part of my life on exploring space, but I don't think thats going to happen at this rate.

NASA at best won't land on the moon again until 2030 in my opinion, I think our only chance is for private corporations.

Do you think the final frontier is being ignored?

The government is travelling space, They are doing research, etc.

Whether they choose to tell us or give us details is entirely up to the false stories that they give us.
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top