There's two participants, the seller and buyer. The seller obviously wants to sell the name and buyer buy it. So why in the earth would one of them report it for no reason? If the seller sold it and sniped it for himself and reported it, he wouldn't be able to sell it here and if the buyer sniped it??? Why would he even do it

so how it's hard to prove that name got sniped when there's two ppl involved in the trade.
Report it for no reason? are you trying to say that scams don't happen?????????????????????
two participants: the buyer and the seller.
the seller has 'G3722' for sale: 500m 07
I want to buy 'G3722' offer the 500m autowin BUT I make a deal I will
ONLY pay once the name is on an account of my choice, boom you fuck up I figure out when exactly youre xffering the name
BOOM some random account of mine now has the name G3722, there is NO way for you prove that I took it, BUT I wont pay you shit BC the acc isn't on the account I gave you to put the name on..
1.what if someone genuinely tried to register G3722 as you were xfering(low chances of this but could happen) and they make a sythe account and don't know that is a xanax press so I offer to buy it for 5m.. they didn't snipe it/obtained it maliciously why the fuck would this not be allowed.
2. I buy 'superman' for 10m 07, and come here and offer to sell it for 1b, rsn: superman was sniped from our admin when he was selling it and the sniper wanted a quick burger(IDFK).. anywhom I bought it fair and square because superman the admin failed to trade is succesfully he lost it.. (to avoid this he could have sold the acc w the name bound to it/force the buyer to xfer himself it cuts out all the bullshit)
3. so on
4. so on..
If I sat here I could come up with scenarios where the seller loses a name and someone else is trying to sell it who didnt obtain it maliciously.
Why should the seller(who potentially bought the name fair and square with GOOD money be out a sale because YOU got sniped by a bot or by another person.
Too much to read:
It is a free market, and the market has risks(more when involved in the sale of names)
it is your responsibility to xfer the name or to state that your buyer has to find other arrangements for this
IDK lol I feel like your arguments are just invalid(maybe I just have my head too far up my ass to see your point, but I just cant grasp any of your arguments and call them valid.. to me this idea is absurd and just couldn't work I have too many scenarios where[this rule]just wouldnt work)
edit: I'm basically just saying that the name market has extra precautions/risks involved.. love them/live them/learn them.. or hate them.. your choice