Sniped Names List

Wouldn't there have to be a valid way of confirming it was actually sniped?....

Exactly. And off of who's opinion would it be. Who would decide? Would we ask the Sythe mods to input on a good flow of names every week? Would be too hard and we'd need to bend Sythe rules to make it work, even then it wouldn't work.

 

[Internetfamoose]

This would require a full time person trying to monitor these names, that just does not seem viable to me.

 

PM'd Roary about this.

 

We'd be happy to stick a thread for you but you need to be able to verify that names were actually sniped. I don't see a way to do that, but perhaps one of you might know?

 

We'd be happy to stick a thread for you but you need to be able to verify that names were actually sniped. I don't see a way to do that, but perhaps one of you might know?

I don't really understand why we'd have to verify if it was actually sniped? It's not like the sticky would say not to buy the names, just ask the person how they got it, or trade with caution when buying/xferring it.

 

I don't really understand why we'd have to verify if it was actually sniped? It's not like the sticky would say not to buy the names, just ask the person how they got it, or trade with caution when buying/xferring it.

Because then just anybody could claim they had a name sniped even without any proof and raise a lot of unnecessary hassle for the person selling it for no reason.

 

[Winger]

support, no reason why not

 

Because then just anybody could claim they had a name sniped even without any proof and raise a lot of unnecessary hassle for the person selling it for no reason.

You have a point, do you guys think that showing proof that you owned the account is enough? Or is something more neccesary?

 

You have a point, do you guys think that showing proof that you owned the account is enough? Or is something more neccesary?

No, there needs to be proof that the name was actually sniped.

 

No, there needs to be proof that the name was actually sniped.

Yea, I guess thats where this fails :/

 

Yeah, sorry, denied. Thanks for the suggestion though!