Loyal 2 da game
Grand Master
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2006
- Sythe Gold
- 672
- Messages
- 4,691
i mean, McDavid is not the underdog story. Gostisbehere is way more the underdog
How anyone could choose Panarin over Ghost or McDavid I don't know. sure he's eligible for but cmon the dude played how many seasons of pro hockey in the KHL.
Then again, the meaning of the trophy is up to interpretation
"to the player selected as the most proficient in his first year of competition in the National Hockey League (NHL)."
If you're voting strictly based off of the idea of "Best Rookie", it goes to McDavid. No questions asked. If you assume McDavid never got injured and then use his PPG ratio then multiply it by 82 games, he's got 86 pts on the year.
Then take into account he plays on the Oilers. The Oil get hemmed into their own zone so often due to overall poor defense that for a lot of the games this season couldnt make break up a cycle or make a break out pass to save their lives. You put McDavid in Panarin's position of playing on the Hawks with a great defense and system and Patty Kane as his linemate and they'd each finish the season with easily over 100 pts.
However, proficient may mean points total. Then Panarin wins fair and square. Ghost for all the records he broke on the Flyers, plus his overall proficiency at a tougher position to play well as a rookie puts him in the conversation easily too.
That all said, I have zero faith in McDavid winning the Calder. Oilers have gotten historically stiffed all the time. Gretzky not being eligible due to playing in the WHA. Nuge tying Landeskog in pts but did it in 20 less games, but Landeskog had more goals so apparently Landeskog gets the trophy. Next year, Yak ties Huberdeau in pts in the same number of games played, Yak had more goals, trophy goes to Huberdeau. Perhaps other statistical factors came into play but realistically Oil got stiffed twice and I would have no issue in believing that it's going to happen again
How anyone could choose Panarin over Ghost or McDavid I don't know. sure he's eligible for but cmon the dude played how many seasons of pro hockey in the KHL.
Then again, the meaning of the trophy is up to interpretation
"to the player selected as the most proficient in his first year of competition in the National Hockey League (NHL)."
If you're voting strictly based off of the idea of "Best Rookie", it goes to McDavid. No questions asked. If you assume McDavid never got injured and then use his PPG ratio then multiply it by 82 games, he's got 86 pts on the year.
Then take into account he plays on the Oilers. The Oil get hemmed into their own zone so often due to overall poor defense that for a lot of the games this season couldnt make break up a cycle or make a break out pass to save their lives. You put McDavid in Panarin's position of playing on the Hawks with a great defense and system and Patty Kane as his linemate and they'd each finish the season with easily over 100 pts.
However, proficient may mean points total. Then Panarin wins fair and square. Ghost for all the records he broke on the Flyers, plus his overall proficiency at a tougher position to play well as a rookie puts him in the conversation easily too.
That all said, I have zero faith in McDavid winning the Calder. Oilers have gotten historically stiffed all the time. Gretzky not being eligible due to playing in the WHA. Nuge tying Landeskog in pts but did it in 20 less games, but Landeskog had more goals so apparently Landeskog gets the trophy. Next year, Yak ties Huberdeau in pts in the same number of games played, Yak had more goals, trophy goes to Huberdeau. Perhaps other statistical factors came into play but realistically Oil got stiffed twice and I would have no issue in believing that it's going to happen again






















