- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Sythe Gold
- 836
- Messages
- 2,819
You've yet to tell me the significance in this. Saying on average teams go on to win it after winning the first game doesn't mean that specific outcome I gave will be the case, or will necessarily favor such. This is an appeal to popularity fallacy, or rather a large numbers fallacy.
You have to take into account many things.
1. Who has home court advantage
2. How was the game won
3. How bad was the loss
4. Players on the roster
5. Statistics of the game
Usually the better team wins, and if it happens to be the first game then so be it, but you're arguing those who win the first game are more likely to win the series which is false. You'd be pointing at other teams in that scenario which doesn't have an affect on the current game being played.
Let's say the cavs have home court advantage and lose the first game, the playing field would then be even in terms of home court advantage. You can say the raptors have the upper hand since they're a game above but it stops there.
The cavs were up 2-1 against Golden state in the finals. Does this mean they had an 80% chance of winning the series? Not in the slightest.
Memphis was 2-1 against Golden state in the playoffs. Does this mean they had an 80% chance of winning the series? No.
I already gave you the bulls vs cavs scenario.
Yeah, they'd have the upper hand being a game ahead, and having to only win 3 games with a Lebron who's turned up is 25% easier than having to win 4 games .
Obviously it depends on the matchup and cherry-picking examples where teams are down 2-1 and still are favoured to win the series doesn't contribute to your case, it's evident that cases like these happen just as cases where teams are up 2-1 and are favoured to win the series happen (Atlanta was up 2-1 on the nets, does this mean they had an 80% chance of winning the series? Yes.) However when teams are up 2-1 (1-0) no matter the situation, I think the impact is more than just a game. When the matchup will be closer, the game difference especially stealing one on the road forces them to win 3 of 4 - which is hard, and it's teams like the Warriors who are capable of doing so against a weaker opponent. In the case of Raptors vs. Cavs, I can see that being a factor, where if Lebron is off for a game it'll allow the Raptors to sneak out a win and then leave the Cavs with their backs to the wall.
















