• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Should luring be against the rules?

Should luring be against the rules? (Ban-able offence)


  • Total voters
    94
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Luring should be against the rules, especially for trusted users. People can abuse their trust to trick people.
 
This is very true, what usually happens is someone will drop their items in hopes they can antilure the lurer, where in reality, they are actually getting anti antilured.

ahahahah seems confusing but it's actually what happens in 95% of the lures today, no more jojo style
 
Do you still play runescape? Everyone who does should know there are non combat lures.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4iXQfjZ7iM

This is an example of many non combat lures.

Dungeoneering had many lures as well.

@Membership, what's wrong with correcting others? If you want to hear my arguments about this issue, read it here: http://www.sythe.org/denied-suggestions/1667367-make-luring-perm-ban-offense.html

I'm BGlave
With non combat lures, the person getting lured usually is trying to antilure the lurer and try to make quick and easy profits. If your trying to antilure someone you should understand the risks as a warning message pops up.
 
With non combat lures, the person getting lured usually is trying to antilure the lurer and try to make quick and easy profits. If your trying to antilure someone you should understand the risks as a warning message pops up.

There are no warnings messages with non combat lures. These lures are exploited from glitches or uncommon methods.
 
Luring someone is the equivalent of knowing that someone is rich and dropping a few $100 bills in an alleyway so they go to pick them up and then mugging them...
 
There are no warnings messages with non combat lures. These lures are exploited from glitches or uncommon methods.

That is not true, everytime you try to drop an item over 500k it gives you a message asking if your sure if you want to drop the item because you CAN lose it. Look it up if you don't believe me.
 
Luring someone is the equivalent of knowing that someone is rich and dropping a few $100 bills in an alleyway so they go to pick them up and then mugging them...

other than the fact that assault is against the law, where as killing a runescape character is LITERALLY the point of the game. And the fact that one is real life with people actually getting hurt, whereas the other is a videogame whose currency should have no real monetary value.

So yeah, they're entirely the same. Oh wait, no they're entirely unrelated in absolutely every respect
 
Ah ok. Well I guess in that case your right, still tho, you have to realize if you drop an item you can lose it.

That was just an example. All non combat lures don't need you to drop items.

Remember the poh lure? The exploit caused players to lose their rares without dropping any items.
 
Two Factor Authentication User
Oktoberfest 2013
Lawrence
Christmas 2013
Lumpy Space Princess
Easter 2014
Doge
Homosex
Le
Pokémon Trainer
Heidy
Halloween 2013
<3 n4n0
Wait, do you not have an Archer rank?
Easter 2016
SytheSteamer
That was just an example. All non combat lures don't need you to drop items.

Remember the poh lure? The exploit caused players to lose their rares without dropping any items.

Oh the good old days
 
That was just an example. All non combat lures don't need you to drop items.

Remember the poh lure? The exploit caused players to lose their rares without dropping any items.

That was one lure, other then that I don't believe there was any other forcedrop lures. All current lures are either non combat lures where the victim willing drops his items or combat lures.
 
other than the fact that assault is against the law, where as killing a runescape character is LITERALLY the point of the game. And the fact that one is real life with people actually getting hurt, whereas the other is a videogame whose currency should have no real monetary value.

So yeah, they're entirely the same. Oh wait, no they're entirely unrelated in absolutely every respect

They are equals. One could argue that both points are life are to make money and thrive. Therefore I would need to pick up the gold in the wilderness just as much as I would need $300 I saw in the alleyway.

and FALSE. Many people are hurt by Runescape. I say that Runescape is an addiction and that by luring someone and taking their cash, they ARE injured, financially. They will then go out and purchase more gold or goods to attempt to recover ect.

Luring ~ Scamming
 
They are equals. One could argue that both points are life are to make money and thrive. Therefore I would need to pick up the gold in the wilderness just as much as I would need $300 I saw in the alleyway.

and FALSE. Many people are hurt by Runescape. I say that Runescape is an addiction and that by luring someone and taking their cash, they ARE injured, financially. They will then go out and purchase more gold or goods to attempt to recover ect.

Luring ~ Scamming

LOOOL omg if you believe ANYTHING you just wrote, then you need to step out of your bedroom more than once a month.

In absolutely no way, shape or form, does aggravated assault equate to dying in runescape. You sound like one of those kids who attempt suicide for dying while PK'ing. Perhaps you are
 
They are equals. One could argue that both points are life are to make money and thrive. Therefore I would need to pick up the gold in the wilderness just as much as I would need $300 I saw in the alleyway.

and FALSE. Many people are hurt by Runescape. I say that Runescape is an addiction and that by luring someone and taking their cash, they ARE injured, financially. They will then go out and purchase more gold or goods to attempt to recover ect.

Luring ~ Scamming

Bro you been hitting me up asking to get in on the luring scene. You have asked more than once on my gallery in 2007 pics asking me to let you join.

That's hilarious that you think strong-arming someone IRL is equivalent to luring kids on RS lmao.
 
I voted yes. Even if luring isn't against RS rules, it shows shady character which will probably just lead to other stuff. Even if that is an unfair assumption, the act itself is not moral whatsoever. I am pretty sure that the only reason it isn't a bannable offence on RS is because it is probably impossible to monitor and justify bans for lures. It is obviously inflicting mental pain on users (victims).
 
Should only be against the rules if you are knowingly luring another Sythe member. Other than that I just consider it a part of the game, and you just have to watch out for it :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top