the_wippit
Guru
u said they all would have kown in a small community? mary and joseph were married before, and it would be normal for them to have sex, back then they didnt talk about who did who
This Makes me laugh anytime someone speaks of jesus because of that, How could 'Mary' the 'Holy' Mother have had a kid if she was a virgin its Scientifically Impossible
Thats like me Screwing a Girl getting her pregnant Telling EVERYONE she was touched by an angel and is still a virgin Sad Is What It IS.
There's absolutely no scientific proof that says it's impossible to have a virgin birth. Get your facts right.
And how was Judaism dieing? Just because you use big words it dosent mean they have to make sense.
Theres also no proof that Jesus ever existed in the first place, so you can't really discredit those claims either.
Ever heard of the dead sea scrolls? That's hard evidence, proof, historical documentation, blah blah blah of the existence of Jesus. Now where's the proof of Jesus' seven brothers?
I fail to see how they provide documentation, as far as I ever heard the only Christian documents in there were excerpts from Mark that were so illegible there was only 1 complete Greek word.
You're way off. Just way off. So far off, just go. Please, for the sake of saving face, go.
No one cares if you don't prove it wrong.
Omfg, ridiculous. You're so unbelievably stupid.
Listen, type "Dead Sea Scrolls" in Google and the search engine will prove you wrong.
Wikipedia said:Christian connections
Spanish Jesuit José O'Callaghan has argued that one fragment (7Q5) is a New Testament text from the Gospel of Mark, chapter 6, verses 52–53. In recent years this controversial assertion has been taken up again by German scholar Carsten Peter Thiede. A successful identification of this fragment as a passage from Mark would make it the earliest extant New Testament document, dating somewhere between A.D. 30 and 60. Opponents consider that the fragment is tiny and requires so much reconstruction (the only complete word in Greek is "και" = "and") that it could have come from a text other than Mark.
Robert Eisenman advanced the theory that some scrolls actually describe the early Christian community, characterized as more fundamentalist and rigid than the one portrayed by the New Testament. Eisenman also attempted to relate the career of James the Just and the Apostle Paul / Saul of Tarsus to some of these documents.
Found not much. Can't find much on the Christian aspect of it other than it talking about a guy called "The righteous one", not really sure if it's referring to Jesus or not since he was supposedly followed by the "Essenes", who were some Jewish sect.
This looks something like what I had heard in the past:
Any other sources that prove your point more? Proof would be much better support than "You're so unbelievably stupid."
Do you realize how ridiculous you sound? You are denying the existence of Jesus. One second please..
That's more info on the scrolls. Just by taking a quick look at the pic, you can obviously tell there's more than one letter. And it wasn't written in Greek.
That fails to serve as evidence for his existence. The only reason it sounds so silly to question the existence of Jesus is because no one really pays attention to the fact there is little to no evidence for his existence that isn't highly disputed. Ever heard of Mithraism? No one believes in Mithra, but if you read about it, Mithraism is an older parallel of Christianity. They don't talk about that in the church, and with good reason it seems.
It doesn't say that the whole scroll is one letter, just the part that is supposedly from the book of Mark. I read some of the stuff, but a lot of it is just Jewish shit that I could care less for. I also didn't say the whole thing was in Greek, just obviously the section which was supposedly Mark.
You can't scientifically disprove something.
But you can scientifically prove that somethings impossible to do.
yep..
Are you kidding me? You don't know what to believe because of this? First of all, this obviously came from the mouth of a Jew throwing a desperation fairytale in the air as an attempt to rescue his dying religion. Second, 90% of this entire thing is bullshit. There's no proof, facts, or evidence that Jesus had 7 brothers, was born in Galilee, blah blah blah. This is just a lame attempt at rescuing a once religious ethnicity that has gradually turned into an ethnicity based solely around their past traditions and culture.
AHAHHDHDHRH383883383HHHHFRUSTRATION
okay, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus
there's even a section for you towards the bottom.
BULL SHIT WITH GOD ANY THING IS POSSIBLE IT DOSENT MATTER IF ITS NOT SCIENTIFICALLY PROVEN GOD CAN DO ANYTHING HE WANTS !!! AND RIP CITY IS RIGHT D PUNK YOUR WAY OUT OF LINE READ THE BIBLE SOME TIME HUH?
lol mines better.
http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/jesus_myth_history.htm
1.Quit posting in caps it's kind of rude.
2.You presuppose that God exists when asked for proof he exists, which is backwards logic.
3.You cite the Bible when if you had actually read it you would agree that it is just a sewer of contradictions, falsehoods, and myth.
Thank you very much, now run along and learn how to debate properly.

