• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Virgin Birth

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lil Wayne
  • Start date Start date
From what little I've read from that site, it just seems as if some guy is trying to use logic and reasoning, to no avail, to back up his opinion.

Everything starts out with an "I think...", whether it's an opinion or not just means it could be a fact that hasn't been proven yet, as in this case.

And about your number three, you don't know enough about the Bible to judge it in that typical atheist manner. The Bible is not full of contradicitons, myths, etc. The Bible is the most dense book you'll ever come across. There's so much meaning and symbolism behind each and every single paragraph, sentence, word, and character that it'll blow your mind. If you've taken AP English and studied the types of american literature (naturalist, modernist, post-modern, etc) you'll know exactly what I'm talking about. What seems like a bunch of contradictions is just the surface; you need to explore and search deeper than just what's thrown at you.

Believe me, I've read the Bible, and there are so many contradictions and falsehoods that its funny that its still believed by so many people. The contradictions aren't just conflicting messages, there are also blatant fact vs. fact contradictions. All the symbolism is just how you read it. Anybody who reads the Bible like that takes it to mean what he says, not to say what it means.

Heres just a little compilation I happened to find:

http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/rook_hawkins/biblical_errancy/47
 
I laughed so hard when I saw this picture...

The-Atheist-e.jpg


Anyways on an earlier note from one of Phil Yeah's posts, yes infact the Jewish religion is on the brink of extinction (Hopefully that wasn't to harsh :( )
because most Jews simply enjoy the life-style and also 90% of all Rabbis are simply just trying to keep the order of the religion even though they barely follow the practices of it.
And according to Darwin's graphs on the evolution, first you were a frog then you became a mammal and then you became more ape like, then in Phil Yeah's case, you became a retard.
 
Everything starts out with an "I think...", whether it's an opinion or not just means it could be a fact that hasn't been proven yet, as in this case.

Which makes it completely irrelevant to anything...

Believe me, I've read the Bible, and there are so many contradictions and falsehoods that its funny that its still believed by so many people. The contradictions aren't just conflicting messages, there are also blatant fact vs. fact contradictions. All the symbolism is just how you read it. Anybody who reads the Bible like that takes it to mean what he says, not to say what it means.

Heres just a little compilation I happened to find:

http://www.rationalresponders.com/forum/rook_hawkins/biblical_errancy/47

I took two seconds to look at that site and decided it was too boring.. Also, judging solely by the name of the website (rational responders), it's just another opinion by somebody who thinks (s)he has the world figured out. All these sites you keep trying to use as fact or evidence are just theories by random people who, apparently, know it all.

If you ever have the extra time or desire, which I know you don't, take an Interpreting Scriptures class and all your questions will be answered (idk where you're from, but, where I live, that class is usually for incoming freshman at a Catholic school I go to). They probably have the same type of class in your area, just under a different name.
 
Which makes it completely irrelevant to anything...

The same was thought for every discovery ever made. It doesn't make it irrelevant it just means it's either wrong or you're in denial.

I took two seconds to look at that site and decided it was too boring.. Also, judging solely by the name of the website (rational responders), it's just another opinion by somebody who thinks (s)he has the world figured out. All these sites you keep trying to use as fact or evidence are just theories by random people who, apparently, know it all.

I'll take this as you being in denial. Nice try to dodge the contradictions though.

If you ever have the extra time or desire, which I know you don't, take an Interpreting Scriptures class and all your questions will be answered (idk where you're from, but, where I live, that class is usually for incoming freshman at a Catholic school I go to). They probably have the same type of class in your area, just under a different name.

Catholicism...lawl. I bet all that class consists of is inculcating you with ways to look past all the completely bogus shit in scripture. It's called Sunday school where I live lol. Hmm...do Catholics believe the world is only 6,000 years old I wonder...lawl.
 
The same was thought for every discovery ever made. It doesn't make it irrelevant it just means it's either wrong or you're in denial.



I'll take this as you being in denial. Nice try to dodge the contradictions though.



Catholicism...lawl. I bet all that class consists of is inculcating you with ways to look past all the completely bogus shit in scripture. It's called Sunday school where I live lol. Hmm...do Catholics believe the world is only 6,000 years old I wonder...lawl.

It's irrelevant because it's an opinion, not a fact.

I'm not in denial... I seriously took a quick peek at the website and decided it wasn't worth my time. Besides, why would I be in denial over someones opinion/theory that isn't even proven?

There's a difference between Sunday school and this class..
Catholics don't take the bible literally, so no, we don't believe the world has been around for 6,000 years (I'm not even sure it mentions how long it's been around. Maybe civilization has been around for that long, but not the complete existence of this planet..

[[SQUIZZYYYY TIME]]
 
It's irrelevant because it's an opinion, not a fact.

The theory of gravity was an opinion at one time.

I'm not in denial... I seriously took a quick peek at the website and decided it wasn't worth my time. Besides, why would I be in denial over someones opinion/theory that isn't even proven?

It's facts from the Bible that blatantly contradict each other, there is no "its just an opinion/theory cop-out".

There's a difference between Sunday school and this class..
Catholics don't take the bible literally, so no, we don't believe the world has been around for 6,000 years (I'm not even sure it mentions how long it's been around. Maybe civilization has been around for that long, but not the complete existence of this planet..

They just got it by adding the ages of Adam and the other first men until they hit the time of Jesus, then added 2000 years to be where we are. The reason people starting taking the Bible metaphorically and such is because they realized how full of bullshit it is. It has people believing that men lived to be 900, that 2 of every animal in the world fit into a wooden boat, and the universe was made in seven days.
 
I don't believe in that crap....When you die you will be sleeping thats it.....so live life as yiou can....
 
I don't believe in that crap....When you die you will be sleeping thats it.....so live life as yiou can....

Maybe you should start spending you so-called precious life learning how to spell properly and stop contridicting a religion you most likely have no comprehension of.
 
Actually, if you bother checking, you'll notice that the very first so called contradiction is a lie. They are different battles.

Doesn't look like it to me. Looks like parallel records with one number different.
 
I've been smited by God in my own bathroom I dare to walk in there now, long story short, I prayed and it went away instantly. Oh yeah I disagree with you, I believe the Bible :P. Please don't flame me or quote me I beg you!!!!!!!
 
Oh, come on. Stop questioning my beliefs. Anything is possible with God. That's the only simple answer. And why wasn't it a big deal back then? People were as skeptical of you. And I'm sure Mary and Joseph would keep it under wraps. And on top of that, there were many claims of the Messiah at the time.
 
the details don't matter, the point is that Jesus taught people to do good and love and all that, just do it and u'll be rewarded both in this life and (if u believe in it) the afterlife
 
this a pretty interesting topic to talk about, but im kinda stuck between both sides of the arguement.
 
The theory of gravity was an opinion at one time.

Okay? So an opinion remains an opinion until proven. Good point.

It's facts from the Bible that blatantly contradict each other, there is no "its just an opinion/theory cop-out".

I already went through this.. listen to weezy man.

They just got it by adding the ages of Adam and the other first men until they hit the time of Jesus, then added 2000 years to be where we are. The reason people starting taking the Bible metaphorically and such is because they realized how full of bullshit it is. It has people believing that men lived to be 900, that 2 of every animal in the world fit into a wooden boat, and the universe was made in seven days.

Uhh no; you're high. The ancient sumerians were the first civilization to ever to exist. Time started with them because they were the first civilized people to start documenting things, placing records, etc.. Know this, everyone bleeds chaldean/assyrian [modern day sumerians, christian iraqi's]
 
Okay? So an opinion remains an opinion until proven. Good point.

Exactly, but you don't ignore the evidence in support of the opinion just because its only an opinion. You don't say, "Oh well its not a proven fact so I'll just ignore the possibility that it could be true". A historical man named Jesus ever existing is just an opinion if you put it in the terms that you're using.

I already went through this.. listen to weezy man.

What?

Uhh no; you're high. The ancient sumerians were the first civilization to ever to exist. Time started with them because they were the first civilized people to start documenting things, placing records, etc.. Know this, everyone bleeds chaldean/assyrian [modern day sumerians, christian iraqi's]

Yet none of what you just said relates at all to the post I made. I think you're the one who is high.
 
Virgin Birth



If Jesus were really born of a virgin, by the Holy Spirit, everybody in such a small community would have known this and would have talked about it for the first thirty years. But this was not the case. Everybody knew that Jesus was the son of Joseph and not born from the Holy Spirit by a virgin:



(Jn 6:42) and they said, ‘Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph? Do we not know his father and mother? Then how can he say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?



For the first thirty years, the Jews knew that this man was born from Mary and Joseph. Even his own disciples knew that Joseph was his father and that he was from Nazareth (hence not from Bethlehem):



(Jn 1:45) Philip found Nathanael and told him, "We have found the one whom Moses wrote about in the Law, and also the prophets, Jesus son of Joseph, from Nazareth."



At the beginning, even his own disciples knew that he was the son of Joseph and from Nazareth. It was not until later when Jesus convinced his stupid disciples that those were true miracles that he was able to brainwash them with his virgin birth.



The ‘virginity’ story shocked the Jews when he was already thirty! Even his own brothers did not believe that their mother was a virgin nor believed his fake miracles:



(Jn 7:3-5) Jesus' brothers said to him, "Leave here and go to Judea, so that your disciples may see the miracles you do. 4 No one works in secret if he wants to become a public figure. If you do these things manifest yourself to the world." 5 For even his own brothers did not believe in him.



Who would have known him more than his own brothers? His brothers knew him and knew their mother long enough to believe him or not. If he were really born of a virgin by the Holy Spirit, they would have believed him and believed his miracles. At least they would have believed the Holy Spirit, but still they didn’t believe him nor believed his Holy Spirit.



The Rabbis weren’t able to verify her virginity since she had already given birth to seven other ‘earthly conceived’ brothers (number of angel brothers unknown). Since the Rabbis were only able to ask his earthly brothers, and since they had no reason not to believe them, the Rabbis had no choice but to discard the ‘virginity’ story.



If his own brothers did not believe him, why should we? But We are really fortunate to have 'John' as a witness so that we know how Jesus established his fake divinity.


As for his birth was really in Bethlehem or not, those who knew Jesus and his parents confirmed that he was born in Galilee and not in Bethlehem:



(Jn 7:41-43) Others said, "He is the Messiah." Still others asked, "How can the Messiah come from Galilee? Does not the Scripture say that the Messiah will come from David's family and from Bethlehem, the town where David lived?" Thus the people were divided because of Jesus.



So the people knew that Jesus was from Galilee. Even worse, Jesus himself admits that their knowledge about him is correct:



(Jn 7:27-28) But we know where this man is from; when the Messiah comes, no one will know where he is from." Then Jesus, still teaching in the temple courts, cried out, "Yes, you know me, and you know where I am from..."



The people knew for certain that he was not from Bethlehem but that he was from Galilee. Jesus even admitted that their knowledge about him is true.



Also the priests were certain that he came form Galilee:



(Jn 7:52) They replied, "Are you from Galilee, too? Look into it, and you will find that a prophet does not come out of Galilee."



Everybody knew for sure that Jesus came from Galilee, and not from Bethlehem. Jesus conceded to this and did not deny it. But what is most pathetic, is that even Saul, the founder of Christianity, never even mentioned in the NT the virgin birth, birth in Bethlehem, nor ever acknowledged Jesus do a single miracle.



Centuries before Jesus: According to Hindu literature, Krishna, the eighth incarnation of the god Vishnu, was born to the virgin Devaki in fulfillment of prophecy and was visited by wise men who had been guided to him by a star. Angels also announced the birth to herdsmen in the nearby countryside. When King Kansa heard about the miraculous birth of this child, he sent men to "kill all the infants in the neighboring places," but a "heavenly voice" whispered to the foster father of Krishna (who, incidentally, was a carpenter) and warned him to take the child and flee across the Jumna river... In this Hindu legend, we can recognize many parallels to the infancy of Jesus other than the virgin birth element.


Because of this I don't know what to believe.

It's quite simple, she had sex with a goat.
 
Technically Jesus was not prophecized to be born of a virgin. The Hewbrew word used to describe the woman he would be born by was almah, which means "young woman", not "virgin". The specific Hebrew word for "virgin" is bethulah. Almah has no reference to virginity, it means a woman of marriageable ago, or married. There is no tradition of virgin birth in Jewish myth, while it is prevalent in Greek myth. I would say that the writer of the Gospel that tells of virgin birth, (Mark I'm guessing, since most of the other Gospels were based off of it, if not then probably John) either threw that in there to make it more interesting, or just mistranslated it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_Birth

Wow, you know your stuff, all I can say is that I believe in god and the bible, so I believe that he was with the Holy Ghost.
 
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top