Sythe Verified

[gf runescape?]

what about the scammers that are not kids and use their own #'s?

 

That's a bit double-sided.

Invasion of privacy with malicious intent.

If the information were to be released and a subject took it under his or her responsibility to punish the liable individual, if something harmful or harassing were to happen YOU would be liable.

Rofl. Where'd you get your law degree buddy?

 

[S]

Invocation was an SVU as the OP states, he scammed 6.5B RSGP (proof here 1. http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1574197-invocation-scammed-me-4-5b.html and 2. http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1574190-invocation-scammed-me-2b.html ). At that time, ~ worth $1700.

He's long gone yes, however his details should be released.

My question is, would his details be released to his victims? Publicly posted on Sythe? Or handed to staff members in hopes of them contacting him/parents demanding a refund?

Should be all three IMO.

 

Invocation was an SVU as the OP states, he scammed 6.5B RSGP (proof here 1. http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1574197-invocation-scammed-me-4-5b.html and 2. http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer-archive/1574190-invocation-scammed-me-2b.html ). At that time, ~ worth $1700.

He's long gone yes, however his details should be released.

My question is, would his details be released to his victims? Publicly posted on Sythe? Or handed to staff members in hopes of them contacting him/parents demanding a refund?

Should be all three IMO.

We will release everything we have to the victims.

We will release full name, paypal email (and other emails) and suburb to the public along with copies of the evidence.

As it is in the public interest to notify other traders of scammers-at-large, and because the SVU user has a contract with SYTHE AG stating that we may release his/her details if he/she scams, this does not constitute invasion of privacy.

 

[ThugWhaleShoes]

Rofl. Where'd you get your law degree buddy?

Releasing personal information of an individuals whereabouts with an online alias, not "acknowledging" the other parties intentions will open yourself up to a nimiety of legal issues if the aforementioned pursues legal action. Which is imminent if harm is done to someone with information you've provided.

Edit: Was not aware that they are contracted in, my apologies.

 

[S]

We will release everything we have to the victims.

We will release full name, paypal email (and other emails) and suburb to the public along with copies of the evidence.

As it is in the public interest to notify other traders of scammers-at-large, and because the SVU user has a contract with SYTHE AG stating that we may release his/her details if he/she scams, this does not constitute invasion of privacy.

So how would this be done? Would you make a news post, or announcement stating the situation and including the scammers details? Aswell as having staff members contact the victims passing on the scammers details?

 

So how would this be done? Would you make a news post, or announcement stating the situation and including the scammers details? Aswell as having staff members contact the victims passing on the scammers details?

For the publicly released details we will just post them on the end of the scam report. This way google will pick it up and it will become searchable and connected with the evidence for the case.

For the privately released details we will PM them to the victim.

 

[RS_Crispy]

That's a bit double-sided.

Invasion of privacy with malicious intent.

If the information were to be released and a subject took it under his or her responsibility to punish the liable individual, if something harmful or harassing were to happen YOU would be liable.

Thats that I thought.

Like I said in my reply to Sythe, prehaps some sort of 'T&C's' where you have to agree with it being distributed, that, or no SVU.

 

[S]

For the publicly released details we will just post them on the end of the scam report. This way google will pick it up and it will become searchable and connected with the evidence for the case.

For the privately released details we will PM them to the victim.

What differs private details from public? You mentioned above that public included Name, paypal emails, suburb etc. So, private would be parents names, telephone #'s, school and such?

Would the staff look for more details using the SVU provided details as a foundation? So, finding more pertinent details of the scammer using what the SVU initially provided?

 

[alexcaruso100]

cops wont do anything

 

[Alex_J_Leon]

I wasn't aware this was happening. SVU information should definitely be released to the victims in the event of a confirmed scam. It is not illegal to do so.

Holy... best thing I've ever read on this site. I hope that every user who was scammed gets the information of the SVU user who scammed them. This is great. Thank-you Dial for posting this thread.

 

Interesting, although I doubt anything would actually come of the information.

 

I wasn't aware this was happening. SVU information should definitely be released to the victims in the event of a confirmed scam. It is not illegal to do so.

Finally, I hope people become aware of this post.
As sellerman stated, people like invocation should have their details posted, at least then things can ACTUALLY be done to get the poor guys refund.

 

[Suburban Gangsta]

Can't breach privacy just cause there was a scam going on. Of course, we can file a police report, but they won't do shit. There's more important stuff to do. Basically, what it comes down to is....to make people feel more trusting of this community than before.

 

[PogSalesRS]

should be increased to $200 donator tbh

 

[Extremely Rare]

should be increased to $200 donator tbh

Donating to the site has nothing to do with being trustworthy. In fact, if I scammed a bunch of money i'd be much more likely to give it away than if I earned it legitimately.

The point of charging for SVU is to cover any costs associated with the feature. Besides, now that SVU actually means something(well sythe said it will at least) I would prefer it be kept low so more users would actually consider using it.

 

[S]

What differs private details from public? You mentioned above that public included Name, paypal emails, suburb etc. So, private would be parents names, telephone #'s, school and such?

Would the staff look for more details using the SVU provided details as a foundation? So, finding more pertinent details of the scammer using what the SVU initially provided?

Requote for bik rich.

 

[Extremely Rare]

What differs private details from public? You mentioned above that public included Name, paypal emails, suburb etc. So, private would be parents names, telephone #'s, school and such?

School...really? Jesus christ, is SVU supposed to be used to track down people irl and jump them? :laugh:

 

[S]

What differs private details from public? You mentioned above that public included Name, paypal emails, suburb etc. So, private would be parents names, telephone #'s, school and such?

Would the staff look for more details using the SVU provided details as a foundation? So, finding more pertinent details of the scammer using what the SVU initially provided?

Bump for rich.

I still stand by said scammers information being made public throughout the forum, and having some sort of thread dedicated to SVU scammers information.

 

[S]

Bump.