You're not keen as you're minirank addicted.
But others might find it useful to have less miniranks.
Most of them don't make sense, but this change would make them unique, which is the point.
Honestly I'm not super keen on the idea.
A bunch of miniranks would need to be created for it. I don't think it'd actually increase the number of quality threads by much. I think we'd see no difference or a slight increase in spam threads. And it'd take some effort to implement.
I wouldn't mind if it does get created, but the idea doesn't excite me much.
I agree with this. I don't think we'll see any benefits from this if it's on thread creation since you're incentivising making a thread but not actually being part of a discussion.
im all for this. i feel like there are like a billion miniranks we talked about making and never got around to. this would encourage people to suggest more ranks so that we can all win them! it also boosts the minirank market which is kinda non-existent as isCreate 10 or so new ones and make the awarded thing a prize box. Add the probability upon thread creation that the user will be awarded a box and you're set. If they've programmed the site well, they'll have already made all the required functions. All in all it'd be a few lines of code in a couple of spots and we're good to go. Hardly any effort required.
I'm fully supportive on this, but it could promote useless spam topics.
im all for this. i feel like there are like a billion miniranks we talked about making and never got around to. this would encourage people to suggest more ranks so that we can all win them! it also boosts the minirank market which is kinda non-existent as is
logistically speaking, maybe just make it a flat percentage, say 0.5%, and apply it to all forums where post count is gained. the reward could be a prizebox tied along with a pm that says something like "congratulations, you've been awarded a minirank for your (post #)th post on sythe! thanks for participating in the community!"
then people can compare their posts/time between posts/whatevers and it adds a bit more fun to the whole thing
---
as for the spam issue people are brining up, govind recently added a tool that helps us catch serial spammers, and this seems like THE perfect application for his tool. some minor tweaking might be in order, but i think we have it covered. also you guys are pretty good at reporting posts so im not concerned about that aspect of things
i don't think spam is going to be an issue with this in place. and we can do like 0.5% for posting in all forums that give post count and 1% for thread creation. or richard can hide the true values and keep us guessing. but i like the rest of my idea.I'd have to agree with this general idea, although I'm skeptical on "all forums".
I believe this would be helpful to the newer forums that have been created as well, within enticing posters to those sections.
If anything... if it all goes wrong, and it just does majorly promote spam, minus reporting posts, and Govind's tool, it can be scrapped?
i don't think spam is going to be an issue with this in place. and we can do like 0.5% for posting in all forums that give post count and 1% for thread creation. or richard can hide the true values and keep us guessing. but i like the rest of my idea.
Hiding the true value is a great idea - it would promote creating a thread when you have an idea for discussion but otherwise wouldn't, but it would discourage spamming thread creation just to try and get that minirank.
Not sure that it wouldn't discourage spamming but regardless having the value a secret is actually a really good idea. But again, spamming is essentially irrelevant considering there is a reporting tool, a team of moderators, and apparently Govind's made some kind of tool to catch spammers so there's that.

