you didn't provide an argument just your opinion which was noted and discardedCome on Richard of @Sythe respond to my criticisim
you didn't provide an argument just your opinion which was noted and discarded
At the moment if a user goes to another sythe user's gold site and buys something from them then we treat that transaction as though it occurs on sythe.
Therefore the existing rule seems to be that any two sythe members transacting anywhere are subject to the sythe rules.
Logically it follows that a DNT member can't trade a non DNT member offsite.
However as staff have pointed out we haven't been enforcing this rule. Our staff act as courts not police. We can't police offsite activity.
Frankly DNT users should just repay what they owe and pardon.
We're not going to address any scam reports involving non-DNT users who get scammed when trading DNT users.
And although it's against the rules for DNT users to trade as I said if it happens offsite we're not policing it.
That's not an argument, lol. You just made an observation and said you disagreed with it. That's an opinion.You said this
and I said this
I don't agree with that, mainly because you are basically saying that if someone google searches "buy/sell RSGP" and decides to complete a trade and then just because the other user has a sythe account (even though they didn't use sythe.org to find that website) They will be banned for violating their DNT?
That appears to be an argument Richard of @Sythe
That's not an argument, lol. You just made an observation and said you disagreed with it.
I've explained very clearly why, in order to be logically consistent with our existing rules, this rule must be so. You have not presented any counter argument to that. You just said you don't like it.What? I explained why I disagree with your statement, and you say that's not an argument? Go home Richard you are drunk
I've explained very clearly why, in order to be logically consistent with our existing rules, this rule must be so. You have not presented any counter argument to that. You just said you don't like it.
Alright even though you can't string together an actual argument I'll just repeat myself:I don't agree with that, mainly because you are basically saying that if someone google searches "buy/sell RSGP" and decides to complete a trade and then just because the other user has a sythe account (even though they didn't use sythe.org to find that website) They will be banned for violating their DNT?
Alright even though you can't string together an actual argument I'll just repeat myself:
There's no way to prove how a user came to be participating in an offsite trade. And since most sythe trades are completed offsite this means we would have to open a huge loophole to excuse literally any trade from the rules.
Now go away.
pardon your DNT if you think it's in errorSo tell me what I have A DNT for that is actually against the rules for Richard of @Sythe. I have broken no rules and have had this DNT for about 9 months now if I remember correctly. Explain to me the rule that allows me to have a DNT, Since DNT users can no longer trade offsite even if they haven't broken any of the rules here on sythe.org
His pardon was denied.pardon your DNT if you think it's in error
pardon your DNT if you think it's in error
Their dislike of you doesn't factor into itAre you actually being serious? 70% of your staff hate me right now so it won't pass. It passed the first round last time and then got vetoed which is why I had the veto system removed
Their dislike of you doesn't factor into it
I was not going to get involved but lean is right on this,Their dislike of you doesn't factor into it

