Homosexual's Adopting?

[Jansen]

Your improper use of apostrophes has caused me to ignore any rationality that might otherwise be present in your arguments, OP.

I think it's ok.

Having any parents at all, regardless of gender, orientation, etc, is better than being stuck in the Foster Care system.

 

[Louis]

I honestly am against it. Imagine putting a child through that. The insults would be flying at them for a lot of their life.

 

[~Ultimate~]

Well, i personally would feel quite uncomfortable having gay parents. I'd rather just stick to being adopted by a straight couple

 

[DDoS]

Jansen
I like, when ever you post, you don't make a point all. You just try to make yourself sound intelligent, I gotta give you the big fat PHAIL on all your reply's to thread's.

If you learned to read what we're all talking about then you would have a better idea on how not to make yourself sound like a idoit.

"Having any parents at all, regardless of gender, orientation, etc, is better than being stuck in the Foster Care system."

That's talking in the child's point of view, we're talking about the parent's adopting.

The 130,000 kids who he said are not adopted; What race are they? I'm sure 75% of the parents looking to adopt are looking for a baby of the same race, and how many other race's of parent's are trying to adopt besides American; Caucasian, parent's?

 

[Shredderbeam]

Well, i personally would feel quite uncomfortable having gay parents. I'd rather just stick to being adopted by a straight couple

Do you have any right to interfere between the adopting parents and the donor parents?

I just don't understand. Who here actually thinks that they have this right? It's entirely a private issue, and nobody else's business.

 

[Supa_Ramga]

The 130,000 kids who he said are not adopted; What race are they? I'm sure 75% of the parents looking to adopt are looking for a baby of the same race, and how many other race's of parent's are trying to adopt besides American; Caucasian, parent's?

Assuming that is true, does it really matter? It's still 130,000 children that could be adopted by homosexual couples. I honestly doubt they would turn away a chance to raise a child simply because they "are looking for a baby of the same race."

Do you have any right to interfere between the adopting parents and the donor parents?

I just don't understand. Who here actually thinks that they have this right? It's entirely a private issue, and nobody else's business.

Although it may not be ethical, in a Democracy, all our "Private-Property" rights may be in question. We, the people, have the ability (assuming we come to some sort of formal agreement) to restrict or expand our own rights. Although it may not sound ethically correct, technically, yes, we do have the "right" to "interfere." The same way as gun advocates have the "right" to argue that the 2nd Amendment restricts the right to bear arms only to militia forces. In a Democracy, the people have the "right" to interfere with whatever they want, regardless of how ridiculous/unethical their claims are.

 

[xxthebeastxx]

Morally I don't really have an opinion, gay people should be able to adopt. Being up for adoption isn't the kids fault. And tbh, having gay parents would be uncomfortable, and humiliating. I don't know really....

 

[xxthebeastxx]

Adoption is a voluntary matter between the parents giving away the child, and the parents wishing to adopt. There is really no way that you can make it your business.

Sorry m8, but I have to disagree. I think you are misunderstanding, parents usually don't just give their child to people....I live in a foster home, but I'm not up for adoption. But I do happen to know from being in foster care for like 3 years, that most adoptions are from foster care, in which the original parents have no say.

 

[hamza]

i dont think they should be able to because the child will get bullied at school alot because of their parents and it wouldnt b fair

 

[Shredderbeam]

Although it may not be ethical, in a Democracy, all our "Private-Property" rights may be in question. We, the people, have the ability (assuming we come to some sort of formal agreement) to restrict or expand our own rights. Although it may not sound ethically correct, technically, yes, we do have the "right" to "interfere." The same way as gun advocates have the "right" to argue that the 2nd Amendment restricts the right to bear arms only to militia forces. In a Democracy, the people have the "right" to interfere with whatever they want, regardless of how ridiculous/unethical their claims are.

You have the legal right, not the moral right. This is a legal right you should not have.

That's how adoption works when you're a baby.

.

 

[Undefined]

I, personally believe that homosexuals should not be able to adopt a child. People should start considering how the kid's life is going to be later on...

 

[Shredderbeam]

I, personally believe that homosexuals should not be able to adopt a child. People should start considering how the kid's life is going to be later on...

Explain how it is your business.

 

[Undefined]

My business? This a thread where people have given and give their opinions on this topic. I'm showing mine.

 

[Shredderbeam]

Right. However, your belief will generally be ignored by the people at large. They will adopt as they place, without a second glance to your impotent statement of opinion.

 

[DivineEntity]

I think that before answering this question I would have to ask myself one "Would I want to have to go through life with same-sex parents?" No I would not. i have noting against homosexuals though adopting a young child may not be very good for the child physiological development. Harassment at a young age often leads to extrema depression.

 

[jamzpkzsythe]

well it depends i mean

it be kinduh wierd to have to men feeling on you every morning say goodbye johnny have a good day at school...

then theres the fact that same sex parents could be wierd if "johnny" was straight.

 

[TJ]

I think that before answering this question I would have to ask myself one "Would I want to have to go through life with same-sex parents?" No I would not. i have noting against homosexuals though adopting a young child may not be very good for the child physiological development. Harassment at a young age often leads to extrema depression.

So you would rather stay the rest of your life in a orphanage and not live a semi - normal life? So what, the parents are gay. Having parents that love you is better than not having any.

well it depends i mean

it be kinduh wierd to have to men feeling on you every morning say goodbye johnny have a good day at school...

then theres the fact that same sex parents could be wierd if "johnny" was straight.

So if your dad said he loved you then you would feel weird?

 

[Schnell]

I think that before answering this question I would have to ask myself one "Would I want to have to go through life with same-sex parents?" No I would not. i have noting against homosexuals though adopting a young child may not be very good for the child physiological development. Harassment at a young age often leads to extrema depression.

Ask yourself this: "Would I rather grow up with same-sex parents or no parents whatsoever?"

The answer should be obvious, it's not like they're adopting children who would otherwise be adopted by a normal couple.

 

[Unit]

I wud Perfer Same Sex Parents Over No Parents But Sorry I Got Parents.

 

[DarkSpark]

I wud Perfer Same Sex Parents Over No Parents But Sorry I Got Parents.

Do us all a favour and never post in SFA forums again... They are for Intelligent Discussion, something you clearly know nothing about.