Highscores P2P only (Updated with Rank Differences)

[Kratom]

Funny, most of the people against this are sworn long time F2P players, from which Jagex doesn't benefit in any way, nor does it hurt them if they leave. Pretty good update, imo. Only downside is retired legends won't be visible anymore.

 

[thestorm]

Funny, most of the people against this are sworn long time F2P players, from which Jagex doesn't benefit in any way, nor does it hurt them if they leave. Pretty good update, imo. Only downside is retired legends won't be visible anymore.

So according to you these things are non-existent?

 

[Emperor Nero]

So according to you these things are non-existent?

I lol'd because this is so true. People say F2P brings nothing to the table but link traffic probably makes jagex more than membership.

 

[pure chi]

People like old nite, obviously he's not #1 or even in top 10, and other legends of old RS will never be shown on the highscores which is utter bull. So if someone with 200m exp who is #1 becomes f2p, does that mean that because they reached 200m exp first, but lost membership, that if they rejoin they won't be #1? JAGEX just wants people to pay for membership even while they don't play....lol

 

[Splesh]

i sense runescape 2012 coming soon haa

 

[Determinate]

I lol'd because this is so true. People say F2P brings nothing to the table but link traffic probably makes jagex more than membership.

It doesn't. They specifically stated it recently.

 

[Larsiny_family]

awell im p2p but they always fuck it up for the f2p players..

 

[MdM]

This will probably take me from rank ~4700 to 3000ish overall :0



I think it's bullshit to be honest. So now in order to keep their permanent achievement of being rank 1 in a skill, they have to stay p2p for the rest of the lifespan of the game, or else someone can take their achievement?

 

[MdM]

So according to you these things are non-existent?

Lol


"Pay monthly for FREE music!"

 

[theGuitarist]

Lol that is totally lame in so many levels. Definitely unfair. High-scores is always suppose to be a global and free for everyone feature. -.-

Sure, Runescape isn't worth it period playing in F2P but this doesn't make it right.

 

[rstrader1471]

If this is a method to get more members, it's stupid, it's just highscores..

 

[runtkirk3]

I posted on the runescape forums sorta the same thimg... Its called "highscores only members?" or something like that.

 

[i b1 t0 u i]

think is suomi wqiull be top everything we all know he glitched his dung to 200m botted all his stats

 

[p-90_smooth]

im gunna LOL when theirs no f2p left and u have to pay to play

 

[Inspyr]

im gunna LOL when theirs no f2p left and u have to pay to play

Jagex has always said Runescape will remain free, however I do agree. I think you'll see Runescape a P2P MMORPG within the next couple years.

 

[Zerkerfist]

Jagex has always said Runescape will remain free, however I do agree. I think you'll see Runescape a P2P MMORPG within the next couple years.

^ This. I think with RS no longer owned by the Gower brothers, Jagex will go back on alot of things they originally said/promised. Especially after the loss of revenue they must have experienced recently nuking all the bots who paid subscriptions, I would not be surprised if they start making moves towards forcing people to become P2P or quit.

 

[#RawrSwag]

This is really stupid, F2P should be able to have this... F2P have like nothing less on RS nowadays.

 

[Laptop65]

If Jagex force us to become P2P then I'll quit, I'll sell my account if it came to it.

 

[kill dank]

Bogus, but it will take a lot of botted accounts off the high scores.

 

[Sprawl]

Couldn't they just take inactive accounts off the Highscores? F2Pers have a ridiculously hard time leveling most their skills compared to P2P and most of the time the inspiration is for Highscores