I am 100% sure any of those whom suggest recreational drug use to solve a problem are not medical doctors.
This^
If they're not a doctor they shouldn't be suggesting any kind of drug to anybody.
I am 100% sure any of those whom suggest recreational drug use to solve a problem are not medical doctors.
This^
If they're not a doctor they shouldn't be suggesting any kind of drug to anybody.
As Wolfdog said... We're not allowed to talk about hacking and such, should a mod remove the post and infract those just because they disagree with hacking?
Yes but people think differently when they're in bad situations. If they were so smart they wouldn't need to ask for advice as they would know what to do.
The original poster should be smart enough to weed out the bad from the good advice.
This^
If they're not a doctor they shouldn't be suggesting any kind of drug to anybody.
If discussions about illegal hacking/warez/etc. are not allowed here, why does Sythe basically allow rampant discussion of/and encouragement to use and allow illegal drugs?
Note, I'm 19 years old, and have never tried an illegal substance or tobacco for that matter. I dont have a problem with those that use weed, but If we are so strict on some matters of legality, why not others?
My question was why? They are both illegal, and while hacking rules do certainly hold a more important role in the well being of this community, shouldnt all illegal (discussions) be against the rules? or encouraging someone to break the law knowingly?
Also... EDIT : I agree with everything the above poster has said.
BAHAHAHA... 'weed out'. I'm not sure if you meant to do that or not, but good one tk.
Lol, woot someone caught it.
America’s first marijuana law was enacted at Jamestown Colony, Virginia in 1619. It was a law “ordering” all farmers to grow Indian hempseed. There were several other “must grow” laws over the next 200 years (you could be jailed for not growing hemp during times of shortage in Virginia between 1763 and 1767)
This rule should not be implemented for weed, but any illegal drug that is illegal everywhere, if not everywhere then 90% of the world, then it should be not allowed. Because obviously it's extremely dangerous and has no actual helpful use.
This is turning into another one of those "Should weed be legalised" thread. It's the same argument over and over again.
"Should I use weed?"
"No it's illegal"
"Actually, yeah, you should - it eases pain"
Honestly? I think its up to the original poster whether they view posts such as "omg, juzt sm0ke weed bro" as spam, or just completely irrelevant. This is what the report a post is for. It should all vary on a case by case basis, and the quality of the suggestion should, again, be decided by the OP.
Rather than raging at each other about the pros and cons of weed, simply rage about the pros and cons of the suggestion.

