TLDR: Make it against the rules.
Why? (If you even need an explanation...)
Scamming (or stealing) is against the rules regardless of the victim's status on Sythe. Why is it any different if I were to RAT someone that doesn't use Sythe? Why would that be okay?
I found that blackhat cases are dealt with on a case-by-case basis. I like the idea of judging every report on it's merit, but if you're morally okay with hacking somebody using a RAT (or whatever method you like), is it not safe to predict you will also target Sythe members they come into contact with everyday?
The same could be said for my other thread regarding tweeting and doxing users that do not use or are banned from Sythe. Some thoughts would be appreciated.
Why? (If you even need an explanation...)
Scamming (or stealing) is against the rules regardless of the victim's status on Sythe. Why is it any different if I were to RAT someone that doesn't use Sythe? Why would that be okay?
I found that blackhat cases are dealt with on a case-by-case basis. I like the idea of judging every report on it's merit, but if you're morally okay with hacking somebody using a RAT (or whatever method you like), is it not safe to predict you will also target Sythe members they come into contact with everyday?
The same could be said for my other thread regarding tweeting and doxing users that do not use or are banned from Sythe. Some thoughts would be appreciated.
Last edited:





































































