[DENIED] Rule Reform

Discussion in 'Denied Suggestions' started by Milotic, Aug 20, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
[DENIED] Rule Reform
  1. Unread #61 - Oct 23, 2017 at 3:32 PM
  2. Fishyfam
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2017
    Posts:
    336
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    355

    Fishyfam Forum Addict
    Banned

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    the person who is involved in doxing/scamming/tweeting jmods is just as bad as the person getting banned
     
    ^ Milotic likes this.
  3. Unread #62 - Oct 27, 2017 at 10:46 AM
  4. Southpark153
    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2017
    Posts:
    60
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    108
    Discord Username:
    Southpark153#1356
    Two Factor Authentication User

    Southpark153 Member
    $5 USD Donor New

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I support this.

    While the banned user in question may have done some terrible shit, doxing and attempting to damage them in any other way is highly unethical imo. I believe that victims seeking repayment should do what they can to recover their property, however that does not constitute seeking to damage a persons life. Just my two cents.
     
    ^ Milotic likes this.
  5. Unread #63 - Oct 27, 2017 at 10:48 AM
  6. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Says the fella banned for doxing staff members ;s

    Very fair points, thank you.
     
  7. Unread #64 - Jan 24, 2018 at 6:18 AM
  8. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Bumping this because it's ever relevant
     
  9. Unread #65 - Jan 24, 2018 at 1:50 PM
  10. X Shadow
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Posts:
    243
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    232

    X Shadow Previously known as X-Shadow

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    After reading the whole thread twice; No support.
     
  11. Unread #66 - Jan 24, 2018 at 2:02 PM
  12. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Explain why please.
     
  13. Unread #67 - Jan 24, 2018 at 2:37 PM
  14. X Shadow
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Posts:
    243
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    232

    X Shadow Previously known as X-Shadow

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Because I don't support all this doxing/release of personal information, just because the member is banned.

    I've been on this forum for 8 years and never ever in my 8 years at this forum, this has been allowed, simply because it's not the way to punish scammers or to scare them.

    This is not the path Sythe wanna go. Never has been and probably never will. If you want to see this, then you should register up at Hackforums.
     
  15. Unread #68 - Jan 24, 2018 at 2:38 PM
  16. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Sounds like you didn’t read it whatsoever lol
     
  17. Unread #69 - Jan 24, 2018 at 3:06 PM
  18. X Shadow
    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2010
    Posts:
    243
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    232

    X Shadow Previously known as X-Shadow

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I still don't support the idea at all. This thread should be closed.
     
  19. Unread #70 - Jan 24, 2018 at 3:07 PM
  20. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    You literally didn’t read it at all though, given your responses.
     
  21. Unread #71 - Jan 24, 2018 at 4:04 PM
  22. Punjabi3
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2010
    Posts:
    4,881
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    204
    Sythe's 10th Anniversary Two Factor Authentication User Halloween 2014 Detective Christmas 2014 Paper Trading Competition Participant In Memory of Jon

    Punjabi3 ☬Grand Master☬
    Retired Sectional Moderator Cracker Head

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I agree that people who aren't members of sythe shouldn't be doxed unless it is proven that person is a threat to the community.

    People who do scam though shouldn't be provided the same level of security as those who use sythe with good intentions. In my opinion, any and all information that could prevent a scam in the future should be allowed to be attached to a report once the final decision to ban has been made.

    Information such as the below can be very important in preventing future scams:

    Name:
    Payment details (W/U, PP, Crypto Wallet Addresses, and RSNs):
    Contact details (Skype, discord, email and any profiles connected to this information.):

    I've recovered scammed funds in the past simply by using the scammer's skype/ paypal email to dig up information through twitter, facebook and youtube. I never posted it publicly but simply telling the person I would had a great influence in their decision to return the money. Maybe it just needs to be more known that you can be doxed if you scam?
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2018
  23. Unread #72 - Jan 24, 2018 at 4:39 PM
  24. Pikachu
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Posts:
    63,287
    Referrals:
    10
    Sythe Gold:
    13,812
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    706497607035256896
    Discord Username:
    __pikachu
    Verified Ironman I saw Matthew Member of the Month Winner Detective Toast Wallet User
    Sythe's 15th Anniversary Nitro Booster (2) Two Factor Authentication User Christmas 2023 Poképedia Valentine's Day 2021 Valentine's Day 2020 Valentine's Day 2019 Torchbearer 2016 Pokémon Trainer
    Easter 2017 Easter 2016 Christmas 2022 Christmas 2021 Halloween 2022 St. Patrick's Day 2017 Christmas 2016 MushyMuncher Summer 2022 (2) The Glizz

    Pikachu Runewager.com - Osrs Gambling
    Market Moderators Bond Holder CDT Member Our Community Moderators

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    removed any old posts,
    my opionon has changed on this manner and I support the protection of ban users from doxing etc,
    If they were member before they have right to be protected from doxing etc
     
    ^ Milotic likes this.
  25. Unread #73 - Jan 24, 2018 at 4:42 PM
  26. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Care to explain why you changed your point of view?
     
  27. Unread #74 - Jan 24, 2018 at 4:45 PM
  28. Pikachu
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Posts:
    63,287
    Referrals:
    10
    Sythe Gold:
    13,812
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    706497607035256896
    Discord Username:
    __pikachu
    Verified Ironman I saw Matthew Member of the Month Winner Detective Toast Wallet User
    Sythe's 15th Anniversary Nitro Booster (2) Two Factor Authentication User Christmas 2023 Poképedia Valentine's Day 2021 Valentine's Day 2020 Valentine's Day 2019 Torchbearer 2016 Pokémon Trainer
    Easter 2017 Easter 2016 Christmas 2022 Christmas 2021 Halloween 2022 St. Patrick's Day 2017 Christmas 2016 MushyMuncher Summer 2022 (2) The Glizz

    Pikachu Runewager.com - Osrs Gambling
    Market Moderators Bond Holder CDT Member Our Community Moderators

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Many reasons,

    A lot of user's get banned for no reason, I had reported on myself for ban evasion which I had nothing to do with, people could have doxed ddosed me for no reason..

    Not all reports are right, some are wrong, we need to protect people who were banned for no reason but can't get unbanned.
     
    ^ Alice, Zero and Milotic like this.
  29. Unread #75 - Jan 25, 2018 at 10:42 AM
  30. Oeierd
    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2018
    Posts:
    25
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    26

    Oeierd Member

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Yes support because it would mean they would return in the future if they wanted to be in the community again.
     
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2018
  31. Unread #76 - Jan 25, 2018 at 3:00 PM
  32. Pikachu
    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2016
    Posts:
    63,287
    Referrals:
    10
    Sythe Gold:
    13,812
    Vouch Thread:
    Click Here
    Discord Unique ID:
    706497607035256896
    Discord Username:
    __pikachu
    Verified Ironman I saw Matthew Member of the Month Winner Detective Toast Wallet User
    Sythe's 15th Anniversary Nitro Booster (2) Two Factor Authentication User Christmas 2023 Poképedia Valentine's Day 2021 Valentine's Day 2020 Valentine's Day 2019 Torchbearer 2016 Pokémon Trainer
    Easter 2017 Easter 2016 Christmas 2022 Christmas 2021 Halloween 2022 St. Patrick's Day 2017 Christmas 2016 MushyMuncher Summer 2022 (2) The Glizz

    Pikachu Runewager.com - Osrs Gambling
    Market Moderators Bond Holder CDT Member Our Community Moderators

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I'd also like to state that no one has given a valid reason for no supporting this,

    there is only one valid reason for not supporting this:
    • It's waste's staff resources hunting these case's which was the orginal reason it was the reason that rule was changed in first place.
    Have you seen a report a scammer etc it's empty and half the mods do nothing anyway and also these reports weren't that common anyway?

    As for argument eye for eye?
    Scamming someone 50$ and affecting there own real life, professional career and other things is on different level of scumbag ness,
    At least 50$ is only 50$ but damaging someone whole life that they worked hard to achieve like come on? Just because most you sit on a pc all day doesn't mean the rest of us do, and some people have matured after being banned and could be doxed and ddosed for something they did years ago? this rule is could be affecting people who live not just value of fucking 50$! and there also people who are false banned etc, like seriously cop the fuck on.

    there no reason this shouldn't be implemented at all
     
    ^ Southpark153 and Milotic like this.
    Last edited: Jan 25, 2018
  33. Unread #77 - Jan 31, 2018 at 6:34 PM
  34. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Bump.......
     
  35. Unread #78 - Feb 2, 2018 at 4:19 PM
  36. Milotic
    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2015
    Posts:
    6,932
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    1,414

    Milotic Hero

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    Waiting on valid arguments again this still c:
     
    ^ Pikachu likes this.
  37. Unread #79 - Feb 3, 2018 at 8:42 PM
  38. Swerv
    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Posts:
    209
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    212
    Discord Username:
    Swerv

    Swerv Active Member

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I'm not saying this necessarily is going to make me not agree with what you have to say, however it takes a real life scum ball to do a virtual crime not just some nerdy young kid is going to make off with a "heist" from somebody that has the capability to produce something "heistable." I read a law for Connecticut after somebody from the clan Im in had scammed a large amount of gp, that virtual crime is punishable by law. Under $5000 dollars is a misdemeanor, over $5000 dollars is punishable up to 5 years in prison and a fine, and over $10000 dollars is a heavier sentence and larger fine. RSGP is considered to carry an accepted value of about 1 dollar for 1M oldschool and 16 cents for 1M RS3. If someone were to scam a large amount like that I know that at least in Connecticut you can be punished by the law in real life for virtual crime. There was a similar law for other places as well, but who knows if there is any federal or national laws for the U.S or elsewhere.

    Edit: The law specifically references video game items to be protected by that law if they're considered to carry value
     
    Last edited: Feb 3, 2018
  39. Unread #80 - Feb 7, 2018 at 3:24 AM
  40. lipijones
    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2018
    Posts:
    9
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    8

    lipijones Newcomer

    [DENIED] Rule Reform

    I agree with you!!
     
< [DENIED] Bring back guests on IP Audits | [DENIED] Punishment for those who mess up PM confirmations >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site