Counter Lawsuit for botters?

[MrInfinity]

Do you know the definition of a counter lawsuit bra? It means you are fighting back for damages caused from an initial lawsuit. You are basically asking them to sue you.

If you sue them first, you need probable cause. To say they directly damaged you to the point that you need monetary compensation you will need to show that their threat caused legitimate fear. And why would it cause legitimate fear if you were not guilty? You would be on the hook for damages to the Jagex corp and court costs.

/endthread

Your stupid, now that this is cleared up.

You are talking about counterclaim, counter-suit, if you want to get technical about terms.

The OP is talking about a counter lawsuit, as in he is looking for a reason to sue jagex, as he has not been sued.

L2properwording

 

[hotcakes10000]

Your stupid, now that this is cleared up.

You are talking about counterclaim, counter-suit, if you want to get technical about terms.

The OP is talking about a counter lawsuit, as in he is looking for a reason to sue jagex, as he has not been sued.

L2properwording

Counter-suit=Counter lawsuit. But as I said before, if he initializes the lawsuit then he is automatically on the hook for court costs unless the case can be won. This would provide an opportunity for Jages to counter

/facepalmed

 

[MrInfinity]

Counter-suit=Counter lawsuit. But as I said before, if he initializes the lawsuit then he is automatically on the hook for court costs unless the case can be won. This would provide an opportunity for Jages to counter

/facepalmed

Not it doesn't sir, a counter lawsuit can be an unrelated lawsuit or a preemptive lawsuit to move from the defensive to the offensives.

Again you are trying to assume the two things are the same when they are not.

if he initializes the lawsuit then he is automatically on the hook for court costs unless the case can be won

Thank you for telling us the purpose of this thread, to search for any ideas of a winnable case.

@hotcakes10000

/facepalmed

 

[hotcakes10000]

Not it doesn't sir, a counter lawsuit can be an unrelated lawsuit or a preemptive lawsuit to move from the defensive to the offensives.

Again you are trying to assume the two things are the same when they are not.



Thank you for telling us the purpose of this thread, to search for any ideas of a winnable case.

@hotcakes10000

Didn't think some people were this dumb to try and interpret legal terminology they don't understand

 

[MrInfinity]

@hotcakes10000

Didn't think some people were this dumb to try and interpret legal terminology they don't understand

 

[Lighthouse]

I'm never said anything about botting in general, or the game rules. They obtained my e-mail address used to buy the scripts illegally.


Please read OP.




Would you please stop trying to get your post count up by posting shit that has no relevance to anything that has been said so far?

Thanks.

I do not give a shit about post counts. It was relevant as well, as the person I quoted made a ridiculous post about this being discrimination.

Are you upset because your bots stopped working or something?

 

[hotcakes10000]

@hotcakes10000

Glad you agree that you are a downy

 

[IDoItAll]

It's their game, they can watch you if they want, your choice to play.

 

[MrInfinity]

Glad you agree that you are a downy

I prefer uppers myself?

 

[The Pkkid V6]

Honestly, if they wanted to sue you, you couldn't get out of it in any way -.-
If you're getting sued, get owned (y) , they're not gonna sue anyone for no reason, and they won't sue most botters, just the one's who are doing mass botting and affecting the game in a very negative way.

 

[MrInfinity]

Honestly, if they wanted to sue you, you couldn't get out of it in any way -.-
If you're getting sued, get owned (y) , they're not gonna sue anyone for no reason, and they won't sue most botters, just the one's who are doing mass botting and affecting the game in a very negative way.

Except they have no grounds to sue the botters, the botting companies maybe (courts seem to disagree in the past), but by botting you broke no LAWS!

 

[The Pkkid V6]

So a company as large as fagex couldn't easily find a few tiny loopholes? Lmfao, if you're getting sued by them, you're getting sued, no way around it unless the laws of where you live are different to most areas I guess.

 

[MrInfinity]

So a company as large as fagex couldn't easily find a few tiny loopholes? Lmfao, if you're getting sued by them, you're getting sued, no way around it unless the laws of where you live are different to most areas I guess.

Again can you point out the laws botters broke? There's nothing in the DMCA that talks about cheating a game, or macro'ing a game.

 

[Lighthouse]

Except they have no grounds to sue the botters, the botting companies maybe (courts seem to disagree in the past), but by botting you broke no LAWS!

You are arguably circumventing systems that control access to a product by using a bot, thus breaking the DMCA (if you are a US citizen).

Just because you did not make the program you are using, does not mean you are not responsible for any laws broken as a result of using it.

Again can you point out the laws botters broke? There's nothing in the DMCA that talks about cheating a game, or macro'ing a game.

See above.

 

[Zma Vitamin]

They cant sue you, it is a game so nothing will happen so no need for counter sue

 

[rpres8198]

Have you guys been keeping up with the lawsuit jagex has against iBot? I just skimmed the opinion and it looks like Jagex is getting pwned, the District Court in Mass. held:

owner [Jagex] failed to show it had a substantial likelihood of success on merits of its copyright infringement claim; owner failed to show it had a substantial likelihood of success on merits of its DMCA claim; and owner failed to show it had a substantial likelihood of success on merits of its CFAA claim.

Jagex Ltd. v. Impulse Software, 750 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D. Mass. 2010)

Oh, and hotcakes, your legal terminology makes me cringe.

 

[ragingg]

nice thread, imo if it was rsbots or ibot software you brought, that jagex are on about i suggest you read what rsbots.org has said (here: http://www.rsbots.net/forums/index.php?topic=272524.0)
because it seems a sound case that its threats and harassment and the information was obtained illegally meaning the wont be aloud to use it in a court of law... (i cant explain things well just read the post)

 

[ABCisDANK]

Have you guys been keeping up with the lawsuit jagex has against iBot? I just skimmed the opinion and it looks like Jagex is getting pwned, the District Court in Mass. held:



Jagex Ltd. v. Impulse Software, 750 F. Supp. 2d 228 (D. Mass. 2010)

Oh, and hotcakes, your legal terminology makes me cringe.

Jagex's lawyers clearly didn't do a very good job trying to understand the laws they were claiming "botters and botting companies broke", especially considering that the US laws are entirely different than that of the UK. Jagex can't do shit except get reverse cowgirl'd at this point.

nice thread, imo if it was rsbots or ibot software you brought, that jagex are on about i suggest you read what rsbots.org has said (here: http://www.rsbots.net/forums/index.php?topic=272524.0)
because it seems a sound case that its threats and harassment and the information was obtained illegally meaning the wont be aloud to use it in a court of law... (i cant explain things well just read the post)

Thank you, going to quote this and add it to the OP.


Hotcakes shouldn't even be posting on this thread to begin with. Nearly every single one of his posts are spam and the other posts are just babble considering he has ZERO idea what he's talking about.

 

[|Mike|]

There is a lawsuit against jagex right now being held in the district court that i live by, they are being sued for illegally shutting down the botting software or some shit like that, it's a 24 page document. Seems pretty damn legit, i'm going to ask my Constitutional Law teacher if i can get a waver from school to go sit in on the case.

 

[MrInfinity]

There is a lawsuit against jagex right now being held in the district court that i live by, they are being sued for illegally shutting down the botting software or some shit like that, it's a 24 page document. Seems pretty damn legit, i'm going to ask my Constitutional Law teacher if i can get a waver from school to go sit in on the case.

Interesting, keep us updated, especially if you can go watch this unfold.