Bogla

[RSWhat]

naw none of us are

Proof please

 

[Heeatz]

Proof please

Compare his english to R2Anne's/others.

Not-Asian Confirmed.

 

[nodnarbusn]

naw none of us are

Shut up gook

 

[tazmanian pka]

Just saying, I rented their acc once and I had ~150m 07 on their in the invent as I was staking, one if their workers accidentally changed the pw to the wrong acc which booted me off, they could have easily taken the 150m and I would have 0 proof against them. But they are better then that and nothing was touched. They were probably in a bad mood because of what happened to their previous accs, and were more suspicious then usual. So OP, what you are saying is that they should get banned for 6 months because of a simple mistake?

This wasn't a mistake.
They treated me like shit. They booted me off and wouldn't talk to me until I kept pressing them. They took the word of another customer ultimately fucking me over.

 

[Alch]

How many threads are you going to make about me lol, sounds like me getting unbanned is traumatic for you.

a) We could have handled things better, but either way, a report of breaking our ToS is serious for us, because an account being banned is pretty tragic. A better way to handle it would have been to ask kieran to get off while we investigated, but I guess emotions ran high when we got a report from regular customers (turned out to be false), saying he was breaking our ToS, and our staff immediately kicked him off before any damage could be done.

b)At this point, I actually have nothing against giving kieran 10m from what that other guy left on the account when he was breaking the ToS, before donating the rest to charity. The only thing stopping me from doing this is the double-edged nature of the situation.
1)There's the possibility that he didn't even have the money on it, and taking advantage of the confusion of the situation.
2)Giving him the money would seem like we had knowledge of there being money on the account, which is false.
3)Not giving him the money makes it look like I took the money, which is false.
4)On the positive side, it would look like we made amends.

What's the general opinion on this, should he be reimbursed the money he claims to have had on the account? As I stated, I have no problem doing so, as I don't plan on keeping the money involved in primary situation anyways.


And for those who are wondering about our staff, and who they are, here's a very vague quote from our site:

Bogla Gold's roots began in 2007. All of us met after free trade was removed in 2007 when we all joined the same bounty hunter team (KO). Throughout our time in KO we quickly took full control of RWT through med and high crater allowing us to transfer with protection in the middle of the crater. We were able to sell gold and "junk trade" while hunting anyone else trying to do so leaving us with a complete slice of the market.

Together those who currently represent Bogla Gold were able to produce over 100b from 2007-2009 through pking with KO and merchanting (flipping/buy outs) together.

 

[Blade]

For the serious thread.

http://www.sythe.org/report-scammer/1794990-bogla-team.html

How did the staff let that slide? That's disgusting. Their proof for booting the guy off the account and keeping the guy's gold was what the guy reported to them, which was someone pming the account that they were scammed by it. Then they go ahead and tell him this in the end:

Of course paying him back makes it all right and gets an insta unban. But when someone scams, they need to wait 6 months for a pardon.



If he's telling the truth, then odds are Bogla's staff knew how much gold was left. After all, they changed the password and booted the guy off. But why pay that back when he doesn't have proof of that.

Whole situation is tricky, but the one who was repaid was reported by the two who set him/her up. It was cleared up with sufficient proof, some of which is private but isn't needed to be public for the case.

Also, the photo you listed wasn't even needed. First time i've seen it actually, there was plenty more.

Am i missing something?

 

[Alch]

Whole situation is tricky, but the one who was repaid was reported by the two who set him/her up. It was cleared up with sufficient proof, some of which is private but isn't needed to be public for the case.

Also, the photo you listed wasn't even needed. First time i've seen it actually, there was plenty more.

Am i missing something?

The photo is the original conversation after Eva kicked the guy off the account with the "proof"(turned out to be false proof provided by the two who framed him) of him breaking ToS. He helped us with the dispute against isiah and curtis, and was reimbursed 2x deposit fee, and his renting hour, though I still regret how unprofessional the situation was handled (fear of the account being banned led to rash decision from Eva). Now he's claiming there was an additional 10m on the account when it was banned, that there's no way of proving it was there, which is what I address in my post.

 

[ilovegold69]

don't talk shit about asian workers r2anne is my nigga mmk don't fuckin h8 bitch idk who the fuck this booga wannabe mother fucker is but don't be talkin shit about r2anne or i'll beat your fokin head in until you talk like r2jason u fkin hear me?

 

[Panda]

@Apith