R2pleasent

[snappie1000]

Didn't R2 tell you to recover it on IRC, and if you couldn't, that you should contact him?

What he said a few days ago when I contacted him after the account appeal was denied:

It was on IRC and I was using my iPhone, so I took pictures of the IRC. I hope it's big and easy enough to read.

 

[Mordafrem]

What he said a few days ago when I contacted him after the account appeal was denied:

It was on IRC and I was using my iPhone, so I took pictures of the IRC. I hope it's big and easy enough to read.

Fixed the picture for you:

 

[Vi3]

R2 made the thread saying HE was looking for accounts and you should contact James to sell, so I don't know how he can not be responsible if James scammed.

Well put. I agree with king tijn.

He should at least try and help you, whether it be recovering the account or whatever...how sad to see him not doing much about your loss.

 

[justinbt7]

R2 is reponsible but i think he should only pay 1/2 the fees. Jw how much did u buy the acc for?

 

[Legacy1]

Will runs a trusted shop, if James was not an associate of his when the scamming when down no action should be taken against him. He wouldn't just go out of his way, his social life (and trust me i know of it), his gold shop and his school work just to alert you that James is no longer his partner.

In the future I suggest this be a lesson to everyone reading to always confirm, verify someone before under going a trade. Harsh for you tho.

 

[Gorgankle]

and this is why I don't trust anyone here.

I hope something gets done about this. I have no say in what should
be done about this. I mean the most that can be done is have that person
banned, but R2P wasn't directly involved in the trade, so I don't see how is
is responsible. Yes he referred you to someone, but I still would of taken necessary
steps to ensure your trade.

Anyways I hope this all ends well

but most likely forgotten as everything does on Sythe

 

[alexisawesome]

R2 made the thread saying HE was looking for accounts and you should contact James to sell, so I don't know how he can not be responsible if James scammed.

He doesnt even seem to think that he's liable for it though.

 

[Mordafrem]

and this is why I don't trust anyone here.

I hope something gets done about this. I have no say in what should
be done about this. I mean the most that can be done is have that person
banned, but R2P wasn't directly involved in the trade, so I don't see how is
is responsible. Yes he referred you to someone, but I still would of taken necessary
steps to ensure your trade.

Anyways I hope this all ends well

but most likely forgotten as everything does on Sythe

R2P didn't refer people to him, R2P basically had James handling his transactions. Had he referred instead, he would of kept the thread closed, had James open up his own topic, and made a post like "My friend James is looking to buy accounts, his thread can be found here". But that's not what happened.

Snappie posted one key piece of evidence that should be enough to prove that R2P should be held responsible:
http://sythe.org/showpost.php?p=7179536&postcount=9


"I am looking for accounts from safe original owners."

Bolded and underlined the important part. R2P clearly said that HE was looking for accounts, not that James was looking for accounts.

 

[Pen]

R2P should reimburse you for your account. He made the mistake of posting his associates contact information, and needs to take responsibility.

 

[Gorgankle]

R2P didn't refer people to him, R2P basically had James handling his transactions. Had he referred instead, he would of kept the thread closed, had James open up his own topic, and made a post like "My friend James is looking to buy accounts, his thread can be find here". But that's not what happened.

Snappie posted one key piece of evidence that should be enough to prove that R2P should be held responsible:
http://sythe.org/showpost.php?p=7179536&postcount=9


"I am looking for accounts from safe original owners."

Bolded and underlined the important part. R2P clearly said that HE was looking for accounts, not that James was looking for accounts.

See I was too lazy to read the whole thing, but thank you for clarifying.

In that case He should be held responsible.

I still think it should of been held with more caution, but then again
most people don't when it comes to trusted people.

 

[Govind]

You're all acting as if R2 -won't- fix the situation as soon as he can get around to it. He's a busy guy and he made a mistake, it was not malicious on his part; give him some time.

 

[Plznate]

You're all acting as if R2 -won't- fix the situation as soon as he can get around to it. He's a busy guy and he made a mistake, it was not malicious on his part; give him some time.

On the contrary, he blew off another newer member previously when the member posted in RaS about it, and Will basically said it wasnt his fault, and tough.

 

[goku usa]

Just cut the chase and post this in report a scammer forum. If he's ignoring you, then there's no better way to get his attention. You have enough evidence to show that he is responsible.

 

[Willy1234]

Ah, not it's not at all. So it's alright for him to go out and scam (just an example not saying he did) or whatever else because he has done a lot? That's a ridiculous statement. Everyone follows the same rules on this site. If he chooses Ban then he can always try and use the Request A High Pardon section.

Your not putting it into context, He hasn't went out and scammed everyone, If he had he'd obviosuly need to be banned, He obvisouly didn't intend for anyone to be scammed, Although he should take responsibility I wouldn't say a ban is fair due to him being here for a good while.

Example: Guy joins football team 1 week in he fucks up doesn't turn up for training, He gets kicked out.

Guy that's been on the football team for 3 years doesn't turn up for training, He would be let off with it, WHY? Because he's produced a 3 year record of being punctual and loyal.

Think about it before you say my statements are ridiculous

 

[Willy1234]

If you have a friend vouch one of his workers, and the worker ends up running off with your money, it's not your friend's job to reimburse you for lost funds.


Bad analogy; the deal is between the person and the company in this scenario, so yes, it is the companies responsibility to have the goods delivered to the buyer. From what I gather from this incident, the deal was between R2James and snappie, so it is R2James' responsibility to refund him.

What i gathered from the post was that r2James was selling accounts for R2plesant meaning it is his responsibility.

 

[Willy1234]

i read a message in this thread trying to show us how its connected to a food business well let me put it this way lets say their partners in some sort of firm lawyers or what ever but you only know of r2 for being trusted and being #1 lawyer and won every case . he opened up a firm whit x person which you haven't seen any vouches but he is some how connected to r2 u pay the partner to handle your case and he runs off whit your money your wanting r2 to reimburse because he is the modern day Nostradamus and can read the future and knew his partner was going to run off ?


and i didn't come here to flame im just stating the fact you want some hand out which he is not liable to give back. Just learn from your mistake and take a loss end of thread..

@Feren siliver

Honestly be serious the idea your trying to show is you cant even trust your own fellow co worker ? what kind of business are you in ...

You proved my point, Yes I'd expect the law firm to refund me, Then #1 lawyer would have to deal with scamalot.

it's #1's is responsible for #2, If the law firm didn't refund me I could easily take them to court and win.

If your stating #1 just vouched for #2 saying he's a good lawyer and should use him, Then why the fuck is #1 a lawyer he's not going to be getting much business suggesting other lawyers too take his cases is he?

 

Here is my problem with the situation:

1) There is no proof James scammed anything, just heresay.

2) The thread said I am looking for accounts from Original Owners. We sent a form to all buyers which they were to fill out. All of these forms required the users to post that they are the original owners. Snappie later admitted that he lied and was not an original owner of the account.

3) James was never my employee. He was simply someone looking to run an account shop with me. I have seen many staff members create businesses with other users who later end up scamming. They are not held responsible for those situations.

4) GoldRS.com, Sythe's #1 Endorser has been found to change account sellers' information quite often. Many of the accounts are never recovered by the sellers. They have received absolutely no consequences from Sythe.org.

In reaction to these situations I have permanently closed my account section, and banned James for safety.

 

[Sweet Zerker]

Damn that sucks, What will happen now?

 

[Lamas With Hats]

Here is my problem with the situation:

1) There is no proof James scammed anything, just heresay.

2) The thread said I am looking for accounts from Original Owners. We sent a form to all buyers which they were to fill out. All of these forms required the users to post that they are the original owners. Snappie later admitted that he lied and was not an original owner of the account.

3) James was never my employee. He was simply someone looking to run an account shop with me. I have seen many staff members create businesses with other users who later end up scamming. They are not held responsible for those situations.

4) GoldRS.com, Sythe's #1 Endorser has been found to change account sellers' information quite often. Many of the accounts are never recovered by the sellers. They have received absolutely no consequences from Sythe.org.

In reaction to these situations I have permanently closed my account section, and banned James for safety.

I must be mistaken, but for a moment I thought you were insinuating scamming is fine because Gold4rs did it before..

 

[Omnia]

I must be mistaken, but for a moment I thought you were insinuating scamming is fine because Gold4rs did it before..

+1

I don't want to be a bitch or anything. But if the great, trusted R2pleasent really cares about his reputation, he should sort this out in a good way, which would be refunding Snappie ***