[Resolved]

[Gun]

I want to make it very clear this is not about the fact she ignored previous rulings/sythe rules... its the fact she went back into a 2 year old dead thread 3 months ago to clear google searches because a friend asked... AGAINST what is right.


Chloe is a friend of Pie / Pie Jaymie, this particular thread was most recently posted 2016 and locked 2016. I was now just made aware that Richard changed the title, im assuming it said Scammer rather than Scanner Pre-rule implementation.

@Chloe Please explain why the contents of the thread including relevant scam reports that led to his nearly 1 year ban for scamming were deleted 2 years after the thread died/locked? Seems like you're doing someone a favor for potential google tags/etc.

This is in reference to: [Closed]

There are additional threads with info removed relevant to Pie and Chloe posting on them potentially they were edited by her as well.

 

I already explained everything.

It is the same as Bus/Divine, PieGP has/doesn't take part in the spam forum (they haven't in over 6 months) - so anything said about them isn't allowed in the spam forum also at the time of closing the thread you had tags saying "PieGP is a scammer" and the title also had scammer which isn't allowed.

 

[Gun]

I already explained everything.

It is the same as Bus/Divine, PieGP has/doesn't take part in the spam forum (they haven't in over 6 months) - so anything said about them isn't allowed in the spam forum also at the time of closing the thread you had tags saying "PieGP is a scammer" and the title also had scammer which isn't allowed.

So we can't have posts related to when when they WERE active in the SF because they now are NOT? That makes no sense whatsoever. It's not scarring to their image because they shouldn't have made those mistakes in the past anyhow. OR posts when they were banned for scamming myself and other individuals? That's a fucking joke kiddo

 

So we can't have posts related to when when they WERE active in the SF because they now are NOT? That makes no sense whatsoever. It's not scarring to their image because they shouldn't have made those mistakes in the past anyhow. OR posts when they were banned for scamming myself and other individuals? That's a fucking joke kiddo

Can you provide me proof of a valid scam report on PieGP?

 

[Gun]

Can you provide me proof of a valid scam report on PieGP?

Pie Overlord
Pie_Overlord
Pie Over

 

[Gun]

Can you provide me proof of a valid scam report on PieGP?

Regardless of your own internal outcome of this thread it will be left for admin review later.

 

Pie Overlord
Pie_Overlord
Pie Over

It looks like those threads are completely untouched/not edited. The only threads I've edited are the false positives (e.g claiming he scammed and then being proven wrong.)

You still aren't allowed to make a thread saying they are scammers.

 

It looks like those threads are completely untouched/not edited. The only threads I've edited are the false positives (e.g claiming he scammed and then being proven wrong.)

You still aren't allowed to make a thread saying they are scammers.

 

replace scammer with scanner
You can't make a title with the thread title "x is a scammer" unless it's in the report a scammer section and it's an actual scam.
You also can't get people involved in the spam forum section who haven't participated for 6+ months (which PieGP hasn't)

 

[Gun]

replace scammer with scanner
You can't make a title with the thread title "x is a scammer" unless it's in the report a scammer section and it's an actual scam.
You also can't get people involved in the spam forum section who haven't participated for 6+ months (which PieGP hasn't)

The thread title was changed a long time ago by Richard, not yourself. You removed the contents of the post.

 

replace scammer with scanner
You can't make a title with the thread title "x is a scammer" unless it's in the report a scammer section and it's an actual scam.
You also can't get people involved in the spam forum section who haven't participated for 6+ months (which PieGP hasn't)

So if it's proven that the thread was made within that 6 months, does that mean you made a mistake? Just curious.

 

[Gun]

So if it's proven that the thread was made within that 6 months, does that mean you made a mistake? Just curious.

She is in the wrong. She's trying to find one thing to stick to make me stop pursuit. Not going to happen. You removed the contents 2 years after the thread title was changed and no longer had "scammer" in the title.

 

??? he was clearly posting in the spam forum when this thread was made.

 

The thread title was changed a long time ago by Richard, not yourself. You removed the contents of the post.

Because you kept replacing the n's with m's, I'm not going to keep a thread up where you clearly can't follow the rules. Any mod can go through the edit history and see how many times you changed it, you also had tags that said "x is a scammer"

So not only did you keep changing the title, you kept changing the tags. Everyone who keeps defending Gun, think about how you would feel if someone kept calling you a scammer, wouldn't stop changing his thread title/tags and it kept showing up on Google.

You had multiple chances (even Richard edited it back to nn's) but you kept abusing it.

 

[Gun]

Because you kept replacing the n's with m's, I'm not going to keep a thread up where you clearly can't follow the rules. Any mod can go through the edit history and see how many times you changed it, you also had tags that said "x is a scammer"

So not only did you keep changing the title, you kept changing the tags. Everyone who keeps defending Gun, think about how you would feel if someone kept calling you a scammer, wouldn't stop changing his thread title/tags and it kept showing up on Google.

You had multiple chances (even Richard edited it back to nn's) but you kept abusing it.

You are diverting the attention. The thread TITLE was removed AGES ago. You took it upon yourself 3 months ago to remove all of the contents of the post which were valid scam reports etc. How is it that I (as a victim of PieGP) am not allowed to say that in a post?( I am btw, just not the title). Per previous ruling an individual cannot request someone go back and delete their info or personal info relevant to a scam report found to be valid.

 

You are diverting the attention. The thread TITLE was removed AGES ago. You took it upon yourself 3 months ago to remove all of the contents of the post which were valid scam reports etc. How is it that I (as a victim of PieGP) am not allowed to say that in a post?( I am btw, just not the title). Per previous ruling an individual cannot request someone go back and delete their info or personal info relevant to a scam report found to be valid.

When I edited the thread, the tags where "x is a scammer" that is the reason PieGP asked me to remove them because they were coming up on google as scammer, not scanner.

I'll let an Admin handle it from here; they can view the entire thread edit history and they can see what was/wasn't edited and what was/wasn't there at the time of said editing.

 

[Gun]

When I edited the thread, the tags where "x is a scammer" that is the reason PieGP asked me to remove them because they were coming up on google as scammer, not scanner.

I'll let an Admin handle it from here; they can view the entire thread edit history and they can see what was/wasn't edited and what was/wasn't there at the time of said editing.

I am allowed to have those tags in the plain text, it's sad a Global doesn't know the rules. Only the TITLE is subject to change.

Are you going to devote your personal time if i send you a link of every time someone posted "Scammer" in relation to my name in a post in the SF? Ill send you 750 posts. Get a fucking grip.

 

[Gun]

You did this solely out of interest for yourself and your friend as you have stated in the past. I'll find the posts.

 

You did this solely out of interest for yourself and your friend as you have stated in the past. I'll find the posts.

No, you won't. They have already been edited.

 

[Gun]

You did this solely out of interest for yourself and your friend as you have stated in the past. I'll find the posts.

Screenshot - 8afde92f4be90d54ccbc2beef911a319 - Gyazo
Screenshot - afde04330aec383c214d2b8b1433cb60 - Gyazo
Screenshot - 6baec704f5c3a033d4c9cb54ac079925 - Gyazo
You are personally vested in this, im sure i can find more of you "praising" Pie. Maybe he spoiled you with an amazon wishlist or something for all i fucking know. Every argument anyone has made about him even WITH him Pardoning/disputing his ban for scamming multiple people you have stood by and said He's a good guy and not a scammer etc.