cancer cure?? DO YOU BLIVE?

[kill dank]

There's 0% chance that this is even relatively plausible.

Not true. It's the same concept as the oil companies buying out peoples ideas about renewable energy and non-gas powered cars so that their ideas don't get out and ruin them financially.

 

[Devilsfan]

Not true. It's the same concept as the oil companies buying out peoples ideas about renewable energy and non-gas powered cars so that their ideas don't get out and ruin them financially.

No, that isn't the same concept at all. Whether or not we use different forms of energy does not compare to a treatment of a widespread disease.

 

[Devilsfan]

For all those who say this is impossible, i laugh at you. You all need to learn our Government is a FRAUD.

The Government isn't a fraud. People just scream and shout but it's not true at all. It's just your regular wackjob conspiracy theorists.

 

[kill dank]

No, that isn't the same concept at all. Whether or not we use different forms of energy does not compare to a treatment of a widespread disease.

It is the same concept financially. There is no money in a cure, only in treating the symptoms.

The Government isn't a fraud. People just scream and shout but it's not true at all. It's just your regular wackjob conspiracy theorists.

The government isn't completely a fraud, but if people put aside their ignorance for once they would be able to realize that a lot of those "wackjob conspiracy theorists" make some legitimate points. Maybe not on this specific topic, but on plenty of others that people just dismiss as "not true at all."

 

[Skillers FTW]

I wouldn't be surprised.
The government is good at keeping things hidden.

 

[Devilsfan]

It is the same concept financially. There is no money in a cure, only in treating the symptoms.

Untrue, any private company would jump over the concept of a cure easily. And the concept isn't about the financial reasons, it's about the health of people. Thus, the concepts of both don't compare at all.

 

[kill dank]

Untrue, any private company would jump over the concept of a cure easily. And the concept isn't about the financial reasons, it's about the health of people. Thus, the concepts of both don't compare at all.

Why would they jump over the concept when it's the same companies providing the treatment? They would rather have repeat customers that will come back spending money for the rest of their lives than to cure them once for a fee using a relatively cheap treatment method and never have to see them again.

And what do you mean it's not about financial reasons? Everything is about the money. If you really think that these people would rather save lives than add to their already tremendous wealth then you're just being ignorant. And even if it's about the health of people, our world is on a quick path to overcrowding and running out of resources. Why would people stop a disease that solves this problem naturally?

Your missing the point that they don't give a fuck about your life or helping others, it is strictly about the money and furthering the existence of those elite few. One way to do this would be population reduction.


http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=633

 

[Devilsfan]

Why would they jump over the concept when it's the same companies providing the treatment? They would rather have repeat customers that will come back spending money for the rest of their lives than to cure them once for a fee using a relatively cheap treatment method and never have to see them again.

And what do you mean it's not about financial reasons? Everything is about the money. If you really think that these people would rather save lives than add to their already tremendous wealth then you're just being ignorant. And even if it's about the health of people, our world is on a quick path to overcrowding and running out of resources. Why would people stop a disease that solves this problem naturally?

Your missing the point that they don't give a fuck about your life or helping others, it is strictly about the money and furthering the existence of those elite few. One way to do this would be population reduction.


http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=633

No, but people concern for people in their family and everyone knows somebody that has cancer. Everyone is also afraid because if their family has a history of cancer they would love to pay for a treatment for it for the future.

Also, because their are already companies that sell drugs that just help with the disease, so new companies would be formed to create a general cure. Thus, the argument is illogical. Just because a couple of companies profit from it doesn't prevent a new one that wants to make the $$$.

 

[hoxile]

That's like saying do you believe in global warning? No I don't.

I believe in natural climate change, but then.. The government don't want to say that. Think how much the industry in worth.. It's possible with cancer, but I don't think they would be that cold hearted to such a issue.

 

[controller]

Then this should be in the news.

Also, if there's no cure, then there should be in 2030 - non-biological cells.

why would it be in the news if the goverment killed the people, who ever know about it or opened there mouth they would be killed or put in to prison

 

[Dokho]

Honestly, no I don't believe that it happened, although the cure for cancer is something that I do in fact believe in, but don't expect to happen in the next 50+ years.

 

[controller]

For all those who say this is impossible, i laugh at you. You all need to learn our Government is a FRAUD.

i agree with you mate

 

[controller]

Honestly, no I don't believe that it happened, although the cure for cancer is something that I do in fact believe in, but don't expect to happen in the next 50+ years.

i blive there is a cure and the goverment are not letting it out.

 

[JohnK]

Before I discuss anything, I'd like to see sources of your "news articles"...

 

[controller]

i have cancer.....

 

[turtles turtles]

i was reading the papper and it says there was a man who had a cure for cancer but the "usa" goverment killed him because of all the money they will be losing out on.. example charities and stuff..

DO YOU BLIVE THE GOVERMENT WOULD DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT?


The war on cancer is largely a fraud.”

“In 1964, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) spent millions of dollars to stop an alternative cancer treatment which had cured hundreds, if not thousands, of cancer patients”

“The pharmaceutical multinationals, unable to patent or claim exclusive rights to the vitamin, launched a propaganda attack of unprecedented viciousness against B17, despite the fact that hard proof of its efficiency in controlling all forms of cancer surrounds us in overwhelming abundance.”

The general story is that there is a conspiracy by the established medical industry to keep the cure for cancer hidden. This is the “cancer conspiracy” discussed on this page. The reasoning behind this theory typically goes like this:

Alleged Fact 1: Cancer is a multi-billion dollar industry.

LMFAO that would have to be the dumbest thing I have EVER heard...