Cancer - Cure Or No Cure?

[owain jones]

I think there are cures but we are wasting our time trying to find them. Modern scientists know that the average person only uses like 12% of their brain. If they were able to find a way to make the brain more efficient then we would be able to do everything at a much faster rate.

They can make people stronger, taller, smarter, literally immune to pain, prostetic limbs, and even mechanical hearts. It has been proven that race is related to IQ and that a good diet will increase growth in your brain.

Why not increase the efficientcy of the brain? It is definitely possible but then people would go around calling the scientists heartless bastards for thinking about greed, rather than dying people. Yet that greed could cure all.

 

[antchak]

There is no one cure for cancer for the simple reason cancer is a mutation that is unique to the diseased. Every mutation is different. What they are trying to find is a pattern in which a cure could be developed for separate cases quickly. A cure could be developed, and it inevitably will be, but it is less than likely it will be found soon.

 

[grandpa_runescaper]

I suppose if you could rebuild the mutated cell it would be in fact possible to 'cure' the cancerous cell, but most 'cures' people think of are killing the infected cells. Usually it is too late in the case to simply kill all the cells without damaging the organs of the body because of the rapid multiplication rate of the cancer. Thus replacing the cells or rebuilding would seem to be the only logical way to 'cure the cancer'. And no, the government is an incompetently run organization that is hiding no secrets.

 

[antchak]

I think there are cures but we are wasting our time trying to find them. Modern scientists know that the average person only uses like 12% of their brain. If they were able to find a way to make the brain more efficient then we would be able to do everything at a much faster rate.

They can make people stronger, taller, smarter, literally immune to pain, prostetic limbs, and even mechanical hearts. It has been proven that race is related to IQ and that a good diet will increase growth in your brain.

Why not increase the efficientcy of the brain? It is definitely possible but then people would go around calling the scientists heartless bastards for thinking about greed, rather than dying people. Yet that greed could cure all.

Try not to reply unless you have the slightest idea what is going on. There is no way to increase the efficiency of the brain. Only the parts that need to be used are used. Its like DNA; only 3% of DNA is actually used, and the rest is considered genetic trash. It was developed at some time though so it has some purpose, merely unknown to us. Some people speculate that is ancient immunities built up against diseases and so forth, in either case it is irrelevant. The point is that instead of tying to turn human beings into a super race, which is morally unsound and kind of revolting, scientists are working to benefit the human race as a whole. Its no as simple as sitting back and letting the "experts" do everything for you. Its easy to complain.

 

[madhacker14]

There are all sorts of cancer's, some can be cured with a 70-90% chance rate.
We can never be sure the government would do that, but for now, we can't accuse them of such a vicious crime.
I believe that the 100% relife cure, hasn't been discoverd.
Im pretty sure, a scientist will discover it soon, possibly in our lifetime's.

 

[terminator]

i can personally vouch that there is a cure for cancer!!! my mother had a tumor in her leg which was diagnosed as cancer and after recieving chemotherapy and radiotherepy she is now fine. this was like ten years ago and she still has 3 yearly checks to make sure it hasnt come back, which it hasnt!!!

i live in the uk where 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer and i think we all know of someone wo has suffered from the diesese so if there was cure that the goverment was witholding, id be pissed, thats messing with lives!!!!

 

[Ivanlul]

Closed

 

[Paul Adams]

Panacea, the name given to this effective cancer cure, creates an internal environment wherein pathogens, or harmful bacteria, cannot survive. They will die because of this created environment inside you. Specifically, this kind of therapy does not cure the disease itself, but what it does, is that it provides your body with the capacity to cure itself of the particular disease.

 

[preesh]

If the goverment released the cure for cancer or all the other diseases, they wouldnt be able to control the population anymore with fear, longer living would result in more pensions and retiree's. Pharmacutical companys that make loads of money with the making the medicine to relieve pain for cancer patients(oxycontin etc) would lose alot of money aswell.

 

[odt]

It will be decades and decades from now untill we even come close to figuring out a possible cure for cancer

 

[Try and run]

I hate it when people ask this question, as there are many different types of cancer. But I remember seeing this thing on 20/20 or dateline about a guy suffering from Lucimia that found a way to terminate cancer infected areas. He uses these like Nanoparticles and radio waves to like burn the cancer or something. So far from the tests, it doesnt affect anything other than the cancer. They're still working on it though you should look in to it.

 

[ProDuch]

I think that there is a medicament to cure the cancer. Why did not he go out yet? Simply for economic reasons. Let us think of it how much medicament is necessary to support a person attained by a cancer? I do not know it but it is a lot. All that brings back billion of billion dollard in industry pharmaceutics!


(Sorry for my english its actually a translator , im french)