Why do you choose to believe in Abiogenesis?
I don't necessarily "believe" in abiogenesis, I merely think that it is a good hypothesis. It is simpler than an intelligent designer creating life, and experiments seem to show that it is possible.
Why do you choose to believe in Abiogenesis?
I don't necessarily "believe" in abiogenesis, I merely think that it is a good hypothesis. It is simpler than an intelligent designer creating life, and experiments seem to show that it is possible.
Then what do you believe is the most probable to being the truth?
Abiogenesis.
Then why do you believe it to be the most probable to truth? I doubt you accept this, because its simplicity and it is merely possible?
As a catholic i've bin brought up to believe God created life. Nothing anyone can say will change my view and i stick with it.
Infidelic, foolish, bipedal omnivore; it is clearly the work of the Flying Spaghetti Monster. I base this on the letter that the Flying Spaghetti Monster's prophet sent to the Kansas State Department of Education.You should have an open mind, but the way I look at it is that since there was a point where the universe did not exist, there has to be a cause to the beginning and I assume that cause has to be intelligent, and I find that it's the Christian God; but that's what I believe.
That's nice, but this topic is about how you think life came into existence.I personally believe God exists, I am however agnostic. I believe God exists, hope God exists, but at the same time I acknowledge that I do not know the fate of your soul after life has ended. Therefore living my life to a point where I don't base every action of my being to pleasing an all powerful being, but at the same time don't go around burning churches and leading a life of unforgivable sin.
Wow. Damnit. I'm pissed. I had just typed up a HUGE hypothesis, and I highlighted it all, and pressed backspace by accident.
Heres my theory:
These Chemical Reactions created the mighty god, and he created us. I mean, seriously, think people! What if both theories are correct? What about BEFORE the one book of truth? Why couldn't God be created by the chemical reactions, then he discovered a way to create other beings? It could have little difference than us cloning things! This is a great idea, if I can say so myself. I'm ready to argue for it, also.
There is proof that God created life.
The bible.

