[APPROVED]removal of autobumping

[pingy]

remove autobumping as whole

people abusing this system, by farming post count, farming for views. Not actually buying/selling just farming views.

would rather get input from mods like @video who have a brain

people just abuse this system, by removing auto bumping /making it bannable people will still find ways to get around this system but it is going to be 10x harder to do, and will discourage anyone to do so/risk there profile for a bump.

The way I see autobumping is just like viewbotting threads, people who say otherwise are the ones abusing this system.

I can name drop 5+ known users of this site who auto bump with doing 1 sale a month, or 1 sale every 2-3months. Auto bumping for the sole reason of views/growing a profile - getting in the way of active traders


ty

 

[DENIED] Autobumping should be done from a junk account to stop SG farmers
[DENIED] Disallow bumping services

Been suggested multiple times and denied each and every time. No support.

 

[Proto.sapien]

How do you expect to tell the difference between a traditional bump and an autobump?

 

[pingy]

@Laziz @Dieze @Searchy @Chicks

 

How do you expect to tell the difference between a traditional bump and an autobump?

I agree with this. Besides the fact if you can tell or not, people can also just bump 3 times a day manually and 'farm post count and views'. A bot makes it a lot easier, but it won't really stop 'peopel who are not actually buying just farming posts/views '

 

[pingy]

except it will be harder @Zora that's the whole point.

 

[Shin]

I can name drop 5+ known users of this site who auto bump with doing 1 sale a month, or 1 sale every 2-3months. Auto bumping for the sole reason of views/growing a profile - getting in the way of active traders

If they are autobumping threads and refusing to do business when contacted, it would fall under false advertisement. If they're actually only getting 1 sale a month, they may want to pursue other business ventures.

 

No support.

if this woud become from someone like dieze or chicks or mybe someone else i woud say okay not bad idea but you lmao ? you farmed enough of views / posts and now you want to get rid of that or what =?

Just look at your rental thread [$200 donor] 1200+ Vouches Cheapest/Safest Rental services!

You dont even have TOS neither proof of actualy owning account like rules tells you to all you have is 25 pages of bumps on a blank fucking rental thread.

More than clearly was made just to farm more views / posts

 

[WooWoo]

If a thread is bumped the user must be actively trading no? So Autobumping should only be used if its a business with workers who can handle users requests/needs at the time.??

 

[Superfluous]

I totally agree that it's annoying. There are TONS of threads with a tiny business-to-bump ratio... BUT views and post count don't matter in any way, shape, or form. There has to be *some* system for businesses promoting themselves on sythe, and bumping is about as simple as it gets.

 

[WooWoo]

I totally agree that it's annoying. There are TONS of threads with a tiny bump-to-business ratio... BUT views and post count don't matter in any way, shape, or form. There has to be *some* system for businesses promoting themselves on sythe, and bumping is about as simple as it gets.

But autobumping gives sythe gold which is $$$

 

[Superfluous]

But autobumping gives sythe gold which is $$$

Yeah but the gold you get from posting is worth a fraction of the time it takes to post it...

 

[pingy]

@Sh33dy pay me those prices, and ill rent u an account. My post is old and ive been renting for long time

come pay me, and I can rent u. That thread previously had pics but I deleted them to make it simple

And if you had a brain, you would also see my thread of selling staker accounts, whereby I present pictures. If I had accounts to sell, I have accounts to rent. But you're just here to attempt to make me look bad so pointless addressing you.

 

[pingy]

views does help, @Superfluous took me and others ages to build a profile, took me 2 years to build a proper profile on this site. Views effect sales heavily

Ignorant people like @Sh33dy tend to comment without using a brain.

 

[pingy]

If they are autobumping threads and refusing to do business when contacted, it would fall under false advertisement. If they're actually only getting 1 sale a month, they may want to pursue other business ventures.

This does happen though, and that thread of removing bumping after getting a sale to be on top of a thread is rly stupid. Because it now means pointless people who act like they buy/sell will post there posts making the real ones at the very bottom/ not last on top for long.
And the whole point was to incentive people to give a vouch, In order to be on top. Allowing active traders to deserve there position, I don't see how it is negative.

 

Ideally this wouldn't be allowed but there's no real way to enforce it aside from the false advertising rule for bumping while you're not online. No support.

 

No support at all, and I will present my reasoning's down below.

I understand you are frustrated with individuals who don't do sales but still autobump their threads however, I think it would be unfair to remove autobumping from people who are in fact using it to promote their business (for example specific gold sites) who run a 24/7 service. You want these people to do less business just because of certain individuals who bump their threads but are not trading? I'm not sure how that is fair on them considering the fact that now bumps are every 4 hours, someone could have a website which has 24/7 customer service, not be on to bump their threads and then lose sales because of it.

Additionally, another argument to your point of removing autobumping as a whole is what about non-sale related threads i.e. Middleman Section? You want to remove the fact for individuals to autobump their middleman threads? I think that is kind of ridiculous considering the Middleman forums are full of people who actively middleman and you want to ruin that for middlemen too? I think that is extremely unjustified.

whereby I present pictures.

If you want to argue with @Sh33dy talking about how you have pictures on that thread, how comes you aren't presenting proof you actually own partyhats?

[1200+ vouches][$200 donor]Buying and Sellin all RaresALWAYS STOCKEDALWAYS BUYING[Stake/HighLvls]

I'm not seeing any proof you own any partyhats on this thread (despite claiming you're always stocked). That thread has been up since August 11th and I can see no partyhats bought/sold on the thread either.

I'm looking forward to the flame that I'll receive because Pingy flames people who doesn't agree with him!

 

[pingy]

Let me know what phat u want to buy.

Otherwise don't ask silly questions, and try add to a conversation rather than posting for the sake of posting.

 

Let me know what phat u want to buy.

Otherwise don't ask silly questions, and try add to a conversation rather than posting for the sake of posting.

Not a silly question, and please actually quote me when you're talking to me.

Also, I've still yet to hear your counter argument for my previous points.

 

[DENIED] Autobumping should be done from a junk account to stop SG farmers
[DENIED] Disallow bumping services

Been suggested multiple times and denied each and every time. No support.

no support for the reason i quoted.