I don't know why staff does not take action against cherrys then, since everyone knows his word is no good.The cherrys part.
I don't know why staff does not take action against cherrys then, since everyone knows his word is no good.The cherrys part.
I didn't say cherry's did anything wrong though zuzel was slandering cherrys a few months back.I don't know why staff does not take action against cherrys then, since everyone knows his word is no good.
It's not slandering if it's true and with proof.I didn't say cherry's did anything wrong though zuzel was slandering cherrys a few months back.
Zuzel was telling people to use pink clay over holy cherrys because holy cherrys had issues in the past and provided no proof of this?I don't know why staff does not take action against cherrys then, since everyone knows his word is no good.
Zuzel was telling people to use pink clay over holy cherrys because holy cherrys had issues in the past and provided no proof of this?
Please provide me with adequate proof as to why I should trust Pink Clay over holy cherrys lol.
I'm never said a ban was warranted, I was simply saying that can you not say that was slander? And also asking if Zuzel got banned for slandering cherrys in the first place.So Zuzel deserves to get banned? because he posted something against cherrys? That's a dumb reason for a ban.
Imgur
I'm never said a ban was warranted, I was simply saying that can you not say that was slander? And also asking if Zuzel got banned for slandering cherrys in the first place.
If I were to go around and say nobody trust Chechen because he overcharges for his services and he advertises that he's the original owner for his account even though he's not and as a result of me doing that you lose sales, do you think I should be allowed to keep going and ruin your credibility thats you've been working up to build for years? Would you not count that as me slandering your name?
That's slander because there is no truth base. Also people slander eachother every day on Sythe, why does Zuzel have to be banned for this ?
Check the picture, Cherrys can say what he wants but someone else can't? Not fair if you ask me.
Cherrys was lying to his customers , Zuzel tried to expose him and gets banned for it. Not fair
It's just not fair, treat everyone the same.
Zuzel is temp banned.
Slander is telling lies, Zuzel didn't tell lies. He made a report with pictures etc. Instead of Zuzel getting banned, Cherrys should've gotten atleast a warning.
Im curious as I dont see any reports..
I'm taking a wild guess but this was the only thing I found that happened within the last couple hours, maybe build up of offences?Im curious as I dont see any reports..
@Chicks Please remove the off-site feedback/vouch claims from the title. Off-site vouches are not honored here.
no theyre saying its from selling hacked goldI'm taking a wild guess but this was the only thing I found that happened within the last couple hours, maybe build up of offences?
Dammm rip i saw that report a while ago but i thought they threw it out?no theyre saying its from selling hacked gold
Pingy said chicks sold him hacked gold which got him perma banned almost instantly. Don’t know how they would get proof of it thono theyre saying its from selling hacked gold
yeah thats a super difficult 1 to deal withPingy said chicks sold him hacked gold which got him perma banned almost instantly. Don’t know how they would get proof of it tho

