Yoshiki's Feedback Thread

[Tonicsxzx]

Nicest mod I’ve spoken too no offense to anyone else

 

Gawk Gawk 3000

 

10/10

 

Has a big weenie

 

Also good girl

 

PLS CHECK THAT THE ID AND USERNAME MATCH, ESPECIALLY THE ID

 

A real nigga

 

A real nigga

real ass niggas recognize real ass niggas

 

[OsrsSkillz]

You been doing a grand job keeping up with the report selection, Sythe's Lucky to have a mod who puts in a lot of time and care.

 

[Utopia]

Answered all of my reports. Literally all. Either he has no life or he’s just that good. Ima go with the latter, but won’t single out the first

 

[BuckshotAvery]

Excellent Mod! answered me very fast and helped me with my issue. Thank you!

 

Great lad!

 

[Juws]

10 out of 10 thanks for sponsoring the Halloween event

 

There is not enough here to suggest that they are the same person.

 

The reason I don't talk shit about staff ̶a̶l̶o̶t̶ anymore.

 

You retarded as well?

huntsman/funku/eastsideloc fake vouching

To give a bit better context -

Warning me calling someone a scammer without proof...

Banned for attempted scam...

 

You retarded as well?

huntsman/funku/eastsideloc fake vouching

To give a bit better context -

Warning me calling someone a scammer without proof...

Banned for attempted scam...

The offending post stated "Obvious scammer."
Your post broke this rule.
Accusing Someone of Scamming Without Proof: Posting on someone's thread accusing them of scamming without appropriate proof (chat logs do not count as proof).
It could have also been argued your post was spam and I am well aware that I was the person who reported this individual.

 

The offending post stated "Obvious scammer."
Your post broke this rule.
Accusing Someone of Scamming Without Proof: Posting on someone's thread accusing them of scamming without appropriate proof (chat logs do not count as proof).
It could have also been argued your post was spam and I am well aware that I was the person who reported this individual.

Again, I used YOUR link.

Being that there are TWO people in the entire game with the specific on the thread, I think it takes less effort to think of if someone is a scammer (which oh.. he was...) than it would of took to actually give me the warning.

I'm pretty sure even an infant could of noticed he was a scammer. Calling someone who is not a scammer yes, I would agree i'm accusing someone without appropriate proof, however based on the report and clearly based on the knowing of who is what as @Zora himself mentioned as quoted below -

One of these accounts is not maxed, so that eliminates one option.
The other account belongs to a Youtuber who has videos where you can see his bank, which makes it easy to conclude it's not the same account.

It really doesn't take a rocket scientist to put two and two together, and thus you're reaching the point he clearly is and tried to scam. So yes, last time I checked, attempting to be and actually scamming someone are two of the same.

You're welcome.

 

I would agree i'm accusing someone without appropriate proof, .

Thank you, I have gone ahead and reapplied the warning. I suggest that you refamiliarize yourself with the site rules.
The Official Sythe.org Rules

 

Thank you, I have gone ahead and reapplied the warning. I suggest that you refamiliarize yourself with the site rules.
The Official Sythe.org Rules

Or better yet, you can suck my dick. Clearly you don't know the rules yourself.