Trust Ranks

[Fedora]

My suggestion is to add buyable ranks like "Trusted" and "Highly Trusted". These will be "bought" by sending a bond to Matthew around $100-$200. If a user which has a trust rank scams, the bond would be kept for site mantainace or whatever the staff chooses.

I think that adding these ranks would give security to a buyer if the seller has a "trust rank".

I would also add that "trust ranks" can be sold back to Matthew and the cash would be given back to the buyer whenever he chooses to.

Discuss.

 

[Skele]

Trust cannot be bought.

 

$100 for a 'trust' rank? People would be able to scam hundreds then, and just like Skele said, trust cannot be bought. You can possibly buy yourself a TWC .

 

[Fedora]

Trust cannot be bought.

<.< Did you read all the post? It doesn't have to be called "trust rank"...

 

[selling guide]

Easily one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard ;/ This is basically like buying a staff rank.

If it were something along the lines of 'X' amount worth of trades completed with vouches, or something of that sort, leading a a 'trusted rank', then I may be able to understand.

 

[Plznate]

Awful idea. Someone will buy a trust rank, then scam a half wine essentially making a $800 profit.

 

[TheRunescapeNoob]

<.< Did you read all the post? It doesn't have to be called "trust rank"...

Then its simply called a "donator". Nuffsaid.


/Thread.

 

[Tmoe]

There has already been a "bond." Suggestion. This didn't go through and this is nearly the exact same thing.

And as Skele said, Trust can't be bought. Look at Fatih, donates 300$ then bam.

Longer you stay here, the more you'll know who you can truly trust IMO.
Ex: I'd trust Spyike with anything I own and he's one of the few people I fully trust.

 

[Jimmy]

There has already been a "bond." Suggestion. This didn't go through and this is nearly the exact same thing.

And as Skele said, Trust can't be bought. Look at Fatih, donates 300$ then bam.

Longer you stay here, the more you'll know who you can truly trust IMO.
Ex: I'd trust Spyike with anything I own and he's one of the few people I fully trust.

I pity the fool who doesn't trust Spyike270!

On a more serious note, doesn't tis fall under requesting ranks on the DNS list?

 

[Bubba Fuzz]

Like every one else said. Trust can't be bought. Really if you wanted to get something like this then just donate 100 or 200$. then its just like the same thing

 

[XequR]

This is the same exact thing as being a donator!

I'm sure more people would trust Spyike then someone who bought a $5,000 trust bond.

 

[Vanmaster5]

In this case, a trust rank means nothing besides the fact that your desperately trying to get a trust rank to possibly scam people out hundreds. I don't support this idea =( sorry, good try though.

 

[owain jones]

how would this be any different than donating. If someone donates 100$, I don't expect them to scam me for a pin as technically their sythe account cost them 100$

 

[Kleenex]

Okay, I'll buy a highly trusted rank and scam 1000$. Great idea.

-.-

 

[Greg]

There has already been a "bond." Suggestion. This didn't go through and this is nearly the exact same thing.

And as Skele said, Trust can't be bought. Look at Fatih, donates 300$ then bam.

Longer you stay here, the more you'll know who you can truly trust IMO.
Ex: I'd trust Spyike with anything I own and he's one of the few people I fully trust.

What ever happened to fatih anyway? also you gotta trust spyike cause he is the most trusted. also this is a terrible idea ue to the fact you can scam and still profit from donating $200

 

[Sanctuary]

I like the general concept of your idea, but like everyone has said, it would be too easy to give $100, then scam $1000. Again, I like the whole, "being held accountable" type of idea.

 

[x Paranormal x]

Then its simply called a "donator". Nuffsaid.


/Thread.

You are not donating for trust, ur donating for a site / nuffsaid.

 

[Szakel]

What a ridiculous idea, user just donates $100 to get the trust rank then scams a $200 trade.

No support, IMO should be locked.