uhm, Maybe u should look up what blue ray is.
lolz? what did i do wronG i was just saying that ps3 is really not nessecary and that if i wanted something that can play and inchancce god quality i woul go to my philips blue ray dvd player....
uhm, Maybe u should look up what blue ray is.
lolz? what did i do wronG i was just saying that ps3 is really not nessecary and that if i wanted something that can play and inchancce god quality i woul go to my philips blue ray dvd player....
Wow, actually you do need to play them.NO, I don't need to play a game to know it sucks. Tell me, have you ever played Drake of the 99 Dragons? How about Big Rigs? Custer's Revenge? If not, then you can't tell me they aren't the best damn games ever made.
Wrong. Some people find immersion into realistic graphics to be more entertaining.Graphics don't really matter (games don't magically become more fun when they look better)
And if high level graphics was in the scope of the game's project goal...? Certainly not easy to cut down the work already started.I've never heard any game company say "we were going to have more levels, but oh darn, we just didn't have Blu-Ray." And even if that were the case, any game like that could easily just cut down on a less important feature, like graphics.
im my complex every1 has a xbox 360 with live..the reason for this is baecause p3s is bassiclly like a psp but not handheld and blue ray sucks...we all have blue ray dvd players..thats y..but p3s should of stayed at p2n tahts my opinion...
And muffin, i'm sorry but unknown and cruel seriously owned you.
Wrong. Every sentence of mine had a "real point".Only Unknown had real points against Muffin.
Cruel = Not teh ownage.
yeah takeing that route would be the smartest one here couse there are some great minds here waiting to thrash you, your lucky no one felt like gooing into detail and bringing in outside websites....oh wait, maybe i will.Sorry Unknown, but your arguments have dropped below my required intelligence level for debating. My ceasing to debate proves none of your past, present, or future points. Oh, but before I go...
Please make sure you have the last word, doing so will most definitely prove me wrong.
Goodbye!
Absolutely correct!
And blue ray doesn't even make the graphics better, hardly. its like HD.
And it helps you hold more information on a disk ext. How many movies can you hold? I can't think of 500 movies off the top of my head, let alone 40thousand.
Its ridiculous to think that people are actually buying the counsel.
More data=Funner? That doesn't make any sense. That's like saying books with smaller font sizes have better plots.Not movies, a game you idiot. More data you can fit on a cd means bigger better, longer and funner games. The more data you can fit on a cd the better the game will be, aslong as the game designers are good at what they do.
Your point about designers is absolutely true: There aren't any good PS3 games because designers aren't making any, not some inherent problem with the console.If any ps3 game is bad, its the designers fault, not ps3'z. On any game system theres hundreds of bad games, take Xbox for example... It didn't really get well known untill Halo came out.
The ps3 console is awesome. It's the games that let it down, if a designer made a game better than halo for ps3 then everyone would be wanting a ps3. It's the designers fault, not ps3'z.
Xbox360, & WII are obviously the best. PS3= to gay, and also graphics aren't as superior as Xbox360; in some games.

