You've repeatedly claimed to be impartial yet from recent, personal experience you seem to want to inconsistently enforce the rules when the offending party is a pal / someone you're trying to impress
[12:35 AM] Shin: Can you enlighten me what this is in reference to?
You've repeatedly claimed to be impartial yet from recent, personal experience you seem to want to inconsistently enforce the rules when the offending party is a pal / someone you're trying to impress
[12:36 AM] Shin: I'm heading to bed now though. Will read and respond in the morning.
[12:36 AM] Jack: it's regarding your joke of a response to richard breaking the personal information rule
[12:36 AM] Jack: i don't come on here often PM me on sythe if you wish to reply
[12:37 AM] Shin: I wasn't taking that jokingly at all.
[12:37 AM] Shin: You came in with raging fists toward me like I was reponsible for everything.
[12:37 AM] Shin: And I had no clue what you were talking about while trying to get you to slow down and explain the situation.
[12:37 AM] Shin: I explained it to him and it happened to be just a fluke scenario where he happened to insert "REDACTED" not realizing you actually work or worked there.
[12:38 AM] Shin: He had no problem removing it as I figured would be the case, but for me to outright remove it disregarding the staff code or his position on the site is overstepping. It was just as easy to message him and have it removed, which is why I was equally confused you didn't go to him in the first place instead of coming to me with heated fists.
[12:39 AM] Shin: Not sure how you claim I "want to inconsistently enforce rules" when all you did was come to me demanding and furthermore encouraging me to break them.
[12:39 AM] Shin: As if I'm "trying to impress" him either.
[12:39 AM] Shin: Not sure what's getting in to you honestly, but your aggression is falsely directed.
@Sythe