Prove me wrong, win a million gp.

[V--own4g3--V]

That's it, all you have to do is prove my opinion wrong and explain how world peace can come to be.

I believe that world peace can not be united with everyone in the world being happy or at least content with their lifestyle.


Prove my theory wrong, and you win 1 million rs2gp.

Go.

 

[belbn]

Defense does not mean the right to make a preemptive strike. The first one to strike is the guilty party.

Our ultimate goal should be to adopt a rule that government leaders should have no right to kill anybody.

...all nuclear, biological and chemical weapons are not defensive weapons and should be eliminated.

...nations have no right to use military violence to settle their differences. ...the one who strikes first is the culprit and deserves the condemnation of the world community.

Nations should be allowed to defend themselves and the blame should be placed on the one who initiated the violence.

...a criminal has no right to defend himself from punishment imposed by a legitimate government.

The legitimacy of the government is important in this scene.

The government must be the choice of the people.

The government should be the assurer of nonviolence.

There must be some freedoms as guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, especially freedom of speech and freedom for religions.

The majority must be charitable.

It must have a military and diplomatic policy of defense-only.

A government should be considered negligent if it does not provide the means for earning a living for all the people who want to work.

...a reasonable distribution of wealth

 

[WhereIsTheGod]

That's it, all you have to do is prove my opinion wrong and explain how world peace can come to be.

I believe that world peace can not be united with everyone in the world being happy or at least content with their lifestyle.


Prove my theory wrong, and you win 1 million rs2gp.

Go.

It's impossible to prove a negative.
Can we instead disprove the affirmative of your statement?

 

[wired17]

if you prove him wrong then.... youll get a nobel peace prize

 

[diablo rg2]

yes it can, you technically need to put auto guns on everyone, if they go against it. they get shot gimme that 1m now

 

[belbn]

I already won, no need to continue babbling.

 

[WhereIsTheGod]

I already won, no need to continue babbling.

Your idea is an impossible vision.

 

[Infernal Dave]

If that one guy didn't win, heres my statement:
What everyone needs to know is the reality of how our actions reflect to, or affects the Earth.
If one person in the world is motivated to try to do as much as they can to do things to save Earth; it is not enough.
If someone, something, or a whole group spreads a huge fact such as things that will shock most people, it may change them.
It will be very difficult, because you are facing about 6billion people that have a mind of their own.
Pm me if this is acceptable

 

[jaamal]

World peace will never be possible... Plain and simple, if you think so you may add any of my messengers and we can talk.

 

[WhereIsTheGod]

That's it, all you have to do is prove my opinion wrong and explain how world peace can come to be.

I believe that world peace can not be united with everyone in the world being happy or at least content with their lifestyle.


Prove my theory wrong, and you win 1 million rs2gp.

Go.

On second thought...

What i'm proving wrong IS a negative.

So I have to prove:
World peace can be united with everyone in the world being happy or at least content with their lifestyle.

...this may be quite the challenge.

 

[caps lock]

We can try to make everyone happy, but it will merely last less than a month, before people get bored of peace.

 

[ragalshnagal]

Its funny. We actually went over the exact same topic in history class.

As the buhdists believe, it is better to want, then to have. If everyone wants world peace, it will come. Many people dont want world peace E.G- north korea, middle east, there fore it will not happen.

 

[spidie123]

zz if everyone stop scolding vulgar and stop being a violent ass then there may b world peace..

 

[highstandards10]

I don't mean to hurt anyones hopes or dreams, but world peace will never happen and if anybody thinks it will you are ignorant.

 

[jackc]

uhh. like 5 best friends could kill EVERY LIVING THING in the world, thus they would have peace amongst eachother. this means world peace.

 

[cp]

Destroy the world, and start your own. If you are the only one in existence, (and are mentally stable) then you should most likely not argue but rather be at peace with yourself.

World peace will never exist; people hate each other too much, and no matter how kind or "pure" people may tend to say they are, they will turn on those words and be evil.

 

[jebckr]

When the world comes to an end and no life exists will be the only time complete world peace exists.

 

[WhereIsTheGod]

The one person scenario probably wouldn't work.

Look what happens to people in solitary confinement. Think about what would happen if you KNEW that there were no more people on earth - no use in going to try and look for people...

That would be depressing indeed. And that fails the resolution at hand.

 

[mr emporium]

To be honest with u guys
#1 way to get world peace: dont let george bush be president
#2 bomb the world so your the only one on it... there u go world peace XD
#3 stop armys..put possible bombers in deep prisons..
#4 put differ kind of peeps in 1 place..so everyone can get along.
#5be the best pker in rs and never leave your room owning everyone in runesccape mmk?
#6 follow my steps! mmk bye

 

[V--own4g3--V]

To be honest with u guys
#1 way to get world peace: dont let george bush be president
#2 bomb the world so your the only one on it... there u go world peace XD
#3 stop armys..put possible bombers in deep prisons..
#4 put differ kind of peeps in 1 place..so everyone can get along.
#5be the best pker in rs and never leave your room owning everyone in runesccape mmk?
#6 follow my steps! mmk bye

#7 grow a brain and gtfo of my thread.


so far no one has given me a worthy enough answer, although some of you(although i won't say who ) are getting towards the right point.