/Sigh
He made a point to mention that he is using 0.999 recurring,
As for the math, I can't see any problem with it, except that rather than proving 0.999=1, it probably proves recurring numbers are inaccurately portrayed in current mathematics (or maybe that infinity is, in fact a number, so moving the decimal point to the left actually changes the number of 9s after the decimal point from infinity to infinity minus one. I'm not going to try it, but maybe that would make x=0.999). Anyways, the point is that working with things that we don't fully understand, such as infinity, can't deliver conclusive evidence, mostly that which disputes the very core of math. Next thing you know, someone will prove right angles are not congruent by using string theory.