thatguy1234
Guru
They aren't. Rounding plays no part in this. 1/3 is .333~ therefore, 2/3 = .666~ and 3/3 = .999~ = 1
ohh so .999 = 1 doesnt represent the actual number 1 but 1 as in a sense of 1 whole?
They aren't. Rounding plays no part in this. 1/3 is .333~ therefore, 2/3 = .666~ and 3/3 = .999~ = 1
ohh so .999 = 1 doesnt represent the actual number 1 but 1 as in a sense of 1 whole?
They aren't. Rounding plays no part in this. 1/3 is .333~ therefore, 2/3 = .666~ and 3/3 = .999~ = 1
ohh so .999 = 1 doesnt represent the actual number 1 but 1 as in a sense of 1 whole?
.999~ is 1. They are the same number in any representation. It's just two different ways to write it.
Does .999999...etc. = 1?
No.
Absolutely not.
It does. Please show proof otherwise.
I suppose it depends on the context, because 3/3 = 1, and if you're doing 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 but in decimal form and that's what intended, then .9999~ =1
but otherwise no it doesn't .
That's exactly what is meant by it.
Mathematics isn't situation. If they are equal in that one case, they are equal in all cases. Just as the number one can be expressed by different fractions (3/3, 4/4),the number one can be expressed by different decimals (1.0, 0.(9)).
Exactly.
Another definition of two different numbers: Two numbers in which there is a number between them in value.
Find me a number between .9~ and 1. You can't. It doesn't exist.
Uhh, your definition isn't correct.
Simple logic, what about two different numbers that are just one off by 0.000...1 and the 0s being a relatively infinite amount?
To make it easier to understand - take finite numbers for example... 2 and 3 are different numbers but there are no finite numbers between them.
Infinitesimally small numbers don't exist.
2.5?
Irrational numbers don't exist either, but they are still a logical basis for mathematical theoryInfinitesimally small numbers don't exist.
2.5?
The Straight Dope cites a discussion on its own message board that grew out of an unidentified "other message board ... mostly about video games". In the same vein, the question of 0.999... proved such a popular topic in the first seven years of Blizzard Entertainment's Battle.net forums that the company issued a "press release" on April Fools' Day 2004 that it is 1:We are very excited to close the book on this subject once and for all. We've witnessed the heartache and concern over whether .999~ does or does not equal 1, and we're proud that the following proof finally and conclusively addresses the issue for our customers.[45]Two proofs are then offered, based on limits and multiplication by 10.

