Please be mature. If you don't have anything intelligent to say or haven't the read the article, don't post.
Heavy Petting
Peter Singer
2001
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001----.htm
This is an article written in 2001 by the contemporary Australian ethicist Peter Singer. In a nutshell, he is suggesting that we reconsider the taboo of mutually satisfactory sex with animals, as we, as a society, have done with oral sex, homosexuality and so on.
Please read the article before you post your opinion. I won't hesitate to report anyone who spams this thread.
Heavy Petting
Peter Singer
2001
Not so long ago, any form of sexuality not leading to the conception of children was seen as, at best, wanton lust, or worse, a perversion. One by one, the taboos have fallen. The idea that it could be wrong to use contraception in order to separate sex from reproduction is now merely quaint. If some religions still teach that masturbation is "self-abuse," that just shows how out of touch they have become. Sodomy? That's all part of the joy of sex, recommended for couples seeking erotic variety. In many of the world's great cities, gays and lesbians can be open about their sexual preferences to an extent unimaginable a century ago. You can even do it in the U.S. Armed Forces, as long as you don't talk about it. Oral sex? Some objected to President Clinton' choice of place and partner, and others thought he should have been more honest about what he had done, but no one dared suggest that he was unfit to be President simply because he had taken part in a sexual activity that was, in many jurisdictions, a crime.
But not every taboo has crumbled. Heard anyone chatting at parties lately about how good it is having sex with their dog? Probably not. Sex with animals is still definitely taboo. If Midas Dekkers, author of Dearest Pet, has got it right, this is not because of its rarity. Dekkers, a Dutch biologist and popular naturalist, has assembled a substantial body of evidence to show that humans have often thought of "love for animals" in ways that go beyond a pat and a hug, or a proper concern for the welfare of members of other species. His book has a wide range of illustrations, going back to a Swedish rock drawing from the Bronze Age of a man fucking a large quadruped of indeterminate species. There is a Greek vase from 520 BC showing a male figure having sex with a stag; a seventeenth-century Indian miniature of a deer mounting a woman; an eighteenth-century European engraving of an ecstatic nun coupling with a donkey, while other nuns look on, smiling; a nineteenth-century Persian painting of a soldier, also with a donkey; and, from the same period, a Japanese drawing of a woman enveloped by a giant octopus who appears to be sucking her cunt, as well as caressing her body with its many limbs. Continued
http://www.utilitarian.net/singer/by/2001----.htm
This is an article written in 2001 by the contemporary Australian ethicist Peter Singer. In a nutshell, he is suggesting that we reconsider the taboo of mutually satisfactory sex with animals, as we, as a society, have done with oral sex, homosexuality and so on.
Please read the article before you post your opinion. I won't hesitate to report anyone who spams this thread.


























