Eye For An Eye Better??

[orbit69]

Why? What will it accomplish in material terms?

yes same thought here

 

[jackc]

yes same thought here

once again i will say it. it teaches people murder and such crimes are wrong. and if they commit them, it will be commited on them. people need to know that it isnt allowed and will not be tollerated.

 

[Phil Yeah]

no if we had that we would all just start killing each other

 

[jackc]

no if we had that we would all just start killing each other

i don't think so because people would know what would happen to them. and please tell me why we would kill eachother because of this?

that makes no sense whatsoever.

 

[Predator]

I think murder should be punished imeaditley(my spelling blows) by death, but smaller crimes shouldn't be this way.

 

[jackc]

thats what im saying.... i hope people understand this.

 

[durial20]

I think an eye for an eye is only allowed in fight, not when a relative is killed. This will make things worse.

About prisons and shit, I don't think 30 years is gonna help, because you shut them down for 30 years, and the world still goes on. Then when they come free, they are totally alienated.

What if the dudes bigger.
He punches some one.
So what the guy gets to punch em back being weak?

Eye for an eye is just dumb in the end it won't work.

 

[w000t]

I really do think that it should be MORE than an eye for an eye because if u torture some one to death your hurting them verry badly.The court system should step up and take charg and kill them ASAP.I say torture them WORSE.Like rip out there eyes and shoot them in the hands and feet then pull there hair out.thats my oppinion on what the court system should do.

 

[jackc]

I really do think that it should be MORE than an eye for an eye because if u torture some one to death your hurting them verry badly.The court system should step up and take charg and kill them ASAP.I say torture them WORSE.Like rip out there eyes and shoot them in the hands and feet then pull there hair out.thats my oppinion on what the court system should do.

thats inhumain. id find it very unlikely that you find someone willing to have that job as well lol.

 

[lord_havok52]

eye for an eye seems reasonable wen its not about death.

 

[jackc]

kk, i see what you are saying havoc. i think the other way around though personally.

 

[Rune Prodigy]

It would be better as everything would now be equalized instead of them arguing.

 

[ownage overdose]

murder yes.
only if hes no doubt 100% guilty.
but wat about rApe?
i think an eye for an eye creates a circle of sin.

 

[jackc]

murder yes.
only if hes no doubt 100% guilty.
but wat about rApe?
i think an eye for an eye creates a circle of sin.

yes well, not all of us belive in sin rofl. and i'd think a certain like drug torcher would go for rape charges.

 

[shamcooly]

No because sometiems they arent always corect.. and no one has the right to kill, killing another person wouldnt help.. plus they would be punished for what they did..

 

[jackc]

No because sometiems they arent always corect.. and no one has the right to kill, killing another person wouldnt help.. plus they would be punished for what they did..

no they wouldnt, thats like a cop being killed for killing someone that shot at an innocent person?

 

[Its_Time]

Not sure I understand the question fully, but if you gave an eye for an eye, you'd be back to where you started

 

[jackc]

Not sure I understand the question fully, but if you gave an eye for an eye, you'd be back to where you started

im not sure i understand what you are saying please reword it lol

 

[Jk O]

www.zamorak.org owns

 

[O m G k 0 e R]

Ghandi says: an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind

I mahatama I says:

I say: if someone does something cruel to someone, why not have that same act commited upon them? After all the "golden rule" of most faiths is "do upon others as you would have them do upon you".