Donald Trump

I'll respond to you since Wins got his brain turned to mush by Spyder

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/

^This is a mostly factual and unbiased evaluation of Islam/IS/Terrorism. The fallback that there are "different interpretations" of Mohammad's actions/writings does not hold water. Mohammad owned slaves. He killed/conquered people. His writings tell people to fight nonbelievers who do not follow Islamic law. In order to "interpret" these things differently, you actually have to replace or ignore many parts of Mohammad's actions and teachings.

Now, there are a lot of people who say they are Muslims who don't follow Islamic law, or believe in Jihad, etc. However, Islamic fundamentalists, like IS, literally believe that Mohammad was a prophet, and that the Quran is the word of Allah.

To keep it on topic:



^ I would assume Trump is poorly sourced, Ben Shapiro has some more extensive numbers here:

 

Nop tim still here I'm just laughing at his opinions about the prophet and him agreeing to BAN ALL MUSLIMS but not just the Radical Muslims that aren't even muslims.

 

^ Stefan Molyneux has the best info on the subject

 

It's certainly a strategical move, just like Germany invading Poland under Hitler was a strategical move, or how Italy invading Egypt under Mussolini was a strategical move.

It's certainly, however, not a fix, or rather one that isn't necessarily good. The guy made some good points in the video. He does mention that Trump plans on doing this until representatives can come to an understanding of why Jihadists hate America. All this does is add fuel to the fire of hate, and potentially radicalize resident Muslim Americans at a greater rate, still putting Americans at risk.

What happens if say, 2 more mass shootings/killings by Muslim Americans happen under Trump's reign as President in a short period of time? Would his plan of putting Muslim Americans in a database come to fruition? This again, would only radicalize more people, essentially making the fight against Islam that much harder.

 

EXACTLY! That is why i hate trump. He's just adding and basically asking for it. He's a fkin tv host he likes all this drama.

 

hope he doesn't win the election and I'm Canadian ....

 

You didn't even read the whole article I bet, neither did I because after reading first 2 pages they still didn't make any point.

As for you saying our Prophet owned slaves, where is your source ?
Did you know him personally ?
I bet your great... Grandfathers had more slaves than our prophet, that your family has killed more people than our Prophet.
Our Prophet set slaves free and banned slavery. Not the other way around.

Also everyone of your citations from the Quran can be proven wrongly interpreted by just adding the simple word "explanation" after it on google.

As for your radicalism vid, you're telling me they surveyed almost every muslim on the planet ?
Yeah right

All I ask (from everyone) is to do some research instead of instantly copying and posting something you found on foxnews,wikipedia, or search results after googling "islam promoted violence proof".

This is first and last reply.
Since I know you will rely with some more bullshit. Also off-topic.

 

The more shit you dig up on either of the party the better Trump will look. Can you understand this or should I write this again? And you wonder why I call you a dumb ****.

Again you fail to read and understand my sentence. Making calling you stupid justified because you can't understand a simple sentence.
Let me paint it out for you in RED:
NO IDEA,NO IDEA,NO IDEA,NO IDEA,NO IDEA,NO IDEA,NO IDEA!

If you took the time to find the 4.5b figure and missed the 9bil figure then I suggest rethinking your sources of information. Pretty sure even the article I read about the topic said that they think Trump is overestimating his net worth. Don't even get it why you keep coming back to this point when it's not even relevant if it's 4,5,6,7,8 or 9 bil.

If that's not trying to assasinate someones characte by linking dogshit articles then idk what is. You shouldn't have even mentioned this in the 1st place, cause it's making you look stupid for wasting my time on UNPROOVEN statements.

This is plain character assasination by association to fascists, no facts, no nothing, just dogshit. If we took your dumb logic as fact then we could say that 2 people(twins for example) who look the same are the same person. Just because someone talks and looks like Hitler does not mean he will act like Hitler. Need more examples why using this sort of character assasination is not justified or is this enough?

And you wonder why I call you stupid.

"The legislative body is not required to approve any executive order, nor can it overturn an order. The best it can do if it doesn't like an executive order is to pass a law to cut funding for the order's implementation. But even then, the president can veto such a defunding law".
source

I suggest investing some time in real journalism and watch this 30min video about immigrants. If you disagree with something then the links are in the description: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4u1J6EEhkyM
In all honesty I doubt you will watch the video, because you are clearly not interested in reality.

Ohh no, he called me stupid for making stupid arguments, I better infract him! I hope you didn't get a panic attack for being called stupid. Libtards are so soft hearted
#YouAreStillStupid

 

Again, you have no idea, yet you claim this will not work. Seems to be working for Israel or did we watch different videos?

Then we have x amount less muslim americans. If this continues then soon there would be even less of these muslim americans etc. Because I know that you are slow when it comes to understanding things then let me explain this to you in more simple terms.

You are gaining weight because you eat 500 grams of chocolate every day and scientists tell you that if you stopped eating the 500 grams then you would start to lose weight. So you agree that you won't buy any more chocolate, but you have managed to store away a few tons of chocolate at your home. Since you won't just throw away the chocolate then you will slowly start to go through your reserved and during this time the problem of gaining weight will not go away. No more chocolate = no more gaining weight.

Gaining weight - shootings motivates by islam
Eating chocolate - dealing with the people causing these shootings
Buying chocolate - muslim immigrants
Stored chocolate - local radical muslims

So in long term this would reduce the number of radical muslims in the US and even if that doesn't fix the problem then we can just throw away the chocolate

The real reason why muslims are doing this shit is because other people are scared to face the reality. They fear to be called racist and stuff. If people would let muslims know that they will not tolerate this shit and will go to the extremes if they have to. Maybe that would start a change. It's not that we want to, but we are forced to do some questionable stuff in order to save the freedoms we cherish. Trump understands this and that's why some people like him, because they too are willing to do some questionable stuff in order to save the freedoms they cherish.

 

How so?

If you have "no idea" who these people are, what justifies you in voting for him if he has no political experience?

That's like me hiring an employee to be manager with no experience in that field, but instead trusting that person because I have a feeling they would know how to assess difficult situations based off an interview alone.

"Your replies consist of inaccurate information and ad hominems."

My reply was:

This proves you didn't read the article I linked as it was in relation to what he said to Mike Tyson, and him being accused was a supportive argument as to why he would say that.

Continue to straw man more.

Source

That's essentially Donald Trump in a nutshell. Feel free to prove otherwise. Me calling Donald Trump a fascist was in reply to:

Meaning it could be worse, in fact, it being worse is imminent.

Once again, you contradict yourself by doing the exact same thing.

Who is the "rape apologist and the communist"? Who is "shady as fuck"?

You aren't exactly a bright one, are you? Continue to call others stupid when you don't even read the articles you link.

Anchor babies (who have birthright citizenship) receive benefits such as food stamps and welfare. Undocumented immigrant parents of those children are not always bound to staying, nor does them receiving benefits by association change anything. Anchor babies overtime outnumbers undocumented immigrants. We'd still be paying "X", regardless.

Source

Keep pushing it and it'll be a month ban from the forum.

Israel is not America. Attempting to mimic other countries, or the laws of those countries do not always bare the same result, especially when there is decades of history that involves hate between two groups.

Americans are still at risk. Simply saying "Eh, we'll wait til the number of radicals decrease in numbers" is not a logical plan. The reason why Trump wants to ban Muslims from entry is to protect Americans. This doesn't solve that issue.

 

Republicans do not want to cut taxes from the rich.
I understand what you're getting at, but the way something is worded is very important.

I've never understood how people are fine with giving away half of their weekly income to the government to be redistributed to the 40% of the country that are too lazy to work/dropped out of high school at age 16 because they were, "thuggin' too hard" to get an education.
Trump doesn't want to cut taxes from the rich, and the concept isn't shady. He wants to reduce the amount of money that people who work hard for a living have to sacrifice to pay for lazy folks who believe the government is there to support them.

Do some research, the United States government was never made to support its people financially, yet so many people believe so.
We aren't socialist, although we are heading that way on a b-line path.
It's like that one college-aged girl who was interviewed on CNN. She said that she'd be okay with having 99% of her income taxed and being redistributed if she made >$200k/year. LOL? What is she smoking, the meth stick? She'd be busting her ass to make $20k a year. Bull shit. There are too many young people who don't truly realize the way the world goes round.

 

And there's also this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=74TFS8r_SMI

 

Amen brother!

There honestly isn't any point in trying to debate with Ghast, he lacks some very basic knowledge and has little to no clue on pretty much anything.
Like how do you debate someone who keeps asking you to repost old statements Fuck that. You can tell him that both dem's and rep's attack Trump and that bringing up dirt of either of the party only makes Trump look better and better but he will just not connect the dots. Most likely he is doing this intentionally. Sugarcoating is his speciality when it comes to hitting children, government abuse etc.

This is actualy quite good and got a cheeky smile on my face

 

Epic response. Ghast, if your definition of "shadiness" is that they are advocating for less theft through taxes, you clearly have a warped moral compass.

 

Don't worry about him chechen. He doesn't know what he's talking about 100% time. He doesn't read just copy/pastes. He can't even read a definition lol and i also think he doesn't even know about the america's history or what the white people have done. Let him post so he say to his friends that he is in a debate.

 

@chechen - the point of a survey is to NOT have to survey the entire planes population under study, chief.
A survey is used to make generalizations about an entire population based on a smaller sample of said population. Stay in school, kid.

 

What have, "the whites people done in America?"
Please elaborate.

 

This isn't about races, this is about Muslims.

 

Jeb bush's tax plan is a large tax cut for the rich.

Source

Donald Trump's tax plan is a large tax cut for the rich.

Source

Marco Rubio's tax plan is a large tax cut for the rich.

Source

Ted Cruz's tax plan is a large tax cut for the rich.

Source

Ben Carson's tax plan is a large tax cut for the rich.

Source

Tell me where I said the government was made to support it's people financially. EVERYONE SHOULD BE TAXED BASED ON THEIR INCOME. The rich shouldn't receive a set tax percentage across the board that doesn't take into account the wealth they're receiving.

Says the guy who contradicts himself every time he replies with inaccurate information. :laugh:

It's called logic and common sense. You get taxed based on your amount of income.

 

You can't just proclaim something is "logic and common sense" without proving it first. How could you possibly consider it permissible that anyone be forced at gunpoint to pay taxes? It is theft, which is clearly immoral.