- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Sythe Gold
- 5,470
- Messages
- 8,076
Well fantastic, pay my taxes for me. I have lots of them.
I'm serious.
I'm serious.
Who on earth would support it?
Do you support the welfare state? public roads? public education?
Then you support taxation.
I don't.
The government does. I never voted for government either.
So I guess I don't have too.
Well we're in agreement then. Now we just have to find someone who does support taxation, and we can have them pay our taxes right?
Why do they have to pay for our tax? They'll obviously tell us to stop earning wages/money if we don't want to pay tax.
What about GST then? What do you think of it,
Going off-topic but not gonna start a whole thread for that.
yeah i support it but i live in australia and last year only made 28k and thats the lowest tax bracket lol so i got back like $3600 lol and i aint paying your taxes you can pay mine lol
yeah i support it but i live in australia and last year only made 28k and thats the lowest tax bracket lol so i got back like $3600 lol and i aint paying your taxes you can pay mine lol
For tax lovers, what on earth can taxes do that we as "citizens" cannot do ourselves?
Well that's not even the point here.
I would not force someone to pay for something they do not support, and I expect people to extend me the same courtesy.
I think we would all agree that ethical laws should be universal.
For example: it cannot be a valid moral rule that everyone except one guy is morally forbidden from raping. I.e. it cannot be an ethical law that raping is wrong, except in this one case for this one guy right here named Steve.
So, if it is wrong for me to force you to pay for a cause you don't believe in, (such as, for example: a project to arm every person in the middle east, or a project to setup a whaling base in the pacific ocean) then, logically, it is also wrong for you to force me to pay for your welfare state, wars, and ridiculous thugs in blue costumes.
Now if it is the case that this is a valid moral law (that no human should force another human to pay for a cause they don't believe in) then supporters of taxation should pay for all taxation -- especially my taxes, because I don't support taxation. And if it is not the case that this is a valid moral law, then it is not unethical for me to force you to pay my taxes. So either way, supporters of taxation should be paying my taxes.
Let's say the government said to you "okay, you don't support taxation, you don't have to pay." But other people continued to pay. You would still use the facilities that are made from taxation. If a friend had a heart attack you would still ring for a paramedic even though it's the taxes that you are not paying, that paid for that paramedic. You would still ring the police if someone broke in to your house. You would still use public roads. Taxation is crucial to being able to keep the general public in a "comfort zone" so to speak. Without taxation there would be anarchy.
No. My point was that if you didn't pay taxation you would still be happy to use the services that other people have paid for.
Correct. Because I don't support theft, nor using stolen money to build public infrastructure.Without taxation there would not be public services or roads. You would be happy to take full advantage of services that you have contributed absolutely nothing towards.
I did not elect them. What you do with your time and money is your own business, but I did not elect them, therefore they have nothing to do with me.The government is not a "gang of criminals" they are a party elected by the general public.
Well for a start there wouldn't be any standing armies, and therefore very little warfare. Government was the number one cause of unnatural death in the 20th century. You also wouldn't have any government interference in markets, which means no great depression or global financial crisis.Explain to me how the world would be a better place if no'one paid taxes and what you believe the end outcome would be.

