Dave Ellis said:Leave it to the theologian to whimper and cower at the thought of death. The philosopher has no such fear, for he knows nothing awaits him and therefore has nothing to fear.
I got thinking about those who believe we have souls which live on after death and such. I believe the brain, and not the soul, is what makes us. I sort of paraphrased the works of Sam Harris more than anything.
If a part of the brain of a person is removed - such as memory or recognising faces, for example, then we lose the skill associated with said part. And when a person dies, they lose all brain functionality. If conciousness comes from the brain then either;
Which means this idea of a soul was just created to cope with grief and death - if conciousness ends, death is absolute. Most people do not want to believe so. The soul is then brought in to put at peace any thought of an absolute end. The purpose of said soul is to take our conciousness to the afterlife, however, referring to the bullets earlier, the brain does not need a soul to operate. Therefore, the soul does not exist because it would need to do so independent of our concious being and our brain.
- The soul is independent of the brain
- The soul is dependent of the brain
- The soul does not exist
Which means this idea of a soul was just created to cope with grief and death - if conciousness ends, death is absolute. Most people do not want to believe so. The soul is then brought in to put at peace any thought of an absolute end. The purpose of said soul is to take our conciousness to the afterlife, however, referring to the bullets earlier, the brain does not need a soul to operate. Therefore, the soul does not exist because it would need to do so independent of our concious being and our brain.
I'm completely prepared to be torn apart by critique, it happens regularly with my spontaneous pondering








































