DNT for under $50 scams

fuck scammers, ban them all, and only when they are truly sorry and pay back the victims should you allow them back!

 

No way. A scam is a scam and a ban acts as punishment, I don't think an auto-DNT will deter many of these people that you describe.

 

[Subsonic GFX]

Ban anyone who scams. Doesn't matter if it's 5-50 dollars a scam is still a scam. I don't support this idea. Let a lesson be learnt by banning scanners

 

[Flamedog]

This kinda creates a setting where people would think:

- Scamming everything under $50 is safe
- Scamming above = ban

I think that is the wrong incentive and I would personally lean more towards zero tolerance.

And yes I agree when browsing Sythe it does seem like someone has been throwing the banhammer around. You can perceive that either as 'I should be vigilant' or 'holy f this is a community loaded with scammers im the f out of here'. I'm not sure yet what the most popular thought is.

 

[tMoon]

I am not a fan of an immediate transition from scamming $50 -> DNT. I am fine with individuals whom were hacked immediately receiving a DNT, but individuals who consciously scammed I think should be banned for at least a small period of time (a week, whatever, but something).

 

Denied for the reasons above.