Debate Team

Decision would be judged by "Debate Master" or "Head Debater" , just like Head user educator, and they judge it + pick a topic per week.

 

Finn, tell shredder to add you to our convo in MSN, and we'll let you know.

 

I will take all necessary steps to ensure that bias does not enter the decision.

 

Ok, it's offical. Shredderbeam is making this idea, verified or accepted or w\e.

There is going to be an debate team etc. 4 teams x 5 members per team + 1 captain on each team x 5 "Head Debaters"


Head Debater (x5) - Selects a topic to debate about for that week, there is 5 of them (aka x5), and they judge both replies to the topic, and based on the answer and its ability to well, be rational, is the percent of how well its going to be judged.

Debate Captain (x4-1) - Only person allowed to post to Head Debaters debate topics. There is only 1 Debate Captain per the 4 teams.

Debate Members (x4 - 5) - Debate members post debates as if they were in they were posting in SFA, however, since they can't reply to the Head Debaters debate topics, Debate Members must confide with the Debate captain about their answer. There are 5 Debate members per the 4 teams.

Debate Topics - They will be spirtual,rational, and religious questions, they could be random at well too. It's always an idea, that should and can be argued about. 2 Teams verse each other per week (like team a v. team b, team c v. team a), each team is given an point to agruement ...
Ex -
"The topic for this week is The Theory of evolution. Team A, you will be telling us why the Theory of evolution is true, Team B, you will be telling us why it is not."
The team that can make most sense, wins. So, it is close to a matter of persuasion.

---- Thats the team members - more to come -------

 

Finn, scroll to post above yours, I edited it. So it'd make more sense.