testing something---
thanks duly noted,suggesting another 8 ball pool event.
brought in around the same number of ppl as the poke event last time so would be another banger back to back
The issue with allowing the community to vote on all mini ranks is quite simple there is cash prize's majority of the time,Minirank Voting needs to be done via community.
Minirank Voting needs to be done via community.
1) Ridiculous that one participant should be able to recieve 4/10 entries - also after hearing this *same* person (unnamed) got 4/10 entries in a previous Summer event?
2) Should be a limit on how many entries accepted from one person... kinda ridiculous. Ties back up to #1.
3) I saw miniranks that I know for a fact looked better and were less generic than some of the ones that just had a FKN santa hat on. I mean come on?
edit - another point. If Christmas event points are EARNED based off having entries accepted, how tf are people supposed to get more entry points when a single member is getting 4/10 Miniranks entered into contest. That snubs THREE different people out of event points in the contest.
I am working one of them as we speak, just trying to get a sponsor for it.more contests that are gaming related. This is a forum about gaming afterall
(doesnt have to be Runescape/other popular games, can be simple java/board/card games as long as its a community engaging event)
8 ball is good
The issue with allowing the community to vote on all mini ranks is quite simple there is cash prize's majority of the time,
people will put forward unacceptable mini ranks and asked their friends to vote for that mini ranks to claim the prize.
the other major issues if we put forward all the mini ranks is 111ish different mini ranks (example from the last event of the number of mini ranks) is that people will just vote for the biggest meme of mini rank as this site is the main population is trolls and overwhelming amount of mini ranks to vote is just to much but saying this your second suggestion might help with this issue.
I will see if I can get this done on next sessional event mini rank, as we only do them on sessionals events. I see if I can make it so it limited to 1 mini per person and will discuss it with other members. but seem like more fair and good idea to me, we even most likely get higher quality mini ranks.
That's opinion based, not saying majority community doesn't agree with you on this though in this certain event. but the issue is 90% of mini ranks are same generic stuff the majority of the people will most likely vote for one that sticks out and isn't just same generic stuff.
You only get 1 point per event, if your participation even if you have more then 1 mini rank or if your mini rank made it to the public vote or not. I rather confused by what you're saying here and tried to answer it to best of my ability, but to close this you don't get a point per mini rank, it's based on events entries.
I am working one of them as we speak, just trying to get a sponsor for it.
![]()
I am not saying we vote as a whole on ALL the ranks - I am saying that we narrow it down, just like the CDT team would, but as a COMMUNITY. Does that make sense? i think the results would have been far different from the 10 the CDT came to. Then we vote again on the top 10 for winner.
If the biggest minirank happens to be some funny troll MR, so what? It was the most popular, like you just mentioned about it being my opinion down below. That is your own to keep. We would narrow down, as a whole, then vote, as a whole. Just keep eliminating the least popular until 1 left. Or just until 10 and then vote.
If that's the case about attempting in the event = entry, that's fine. I just know that there are weird rules where I saw people just posting an easy 100 point picture on the one Christmas game for the entry, although that didn't entirely follow rules of requiring a video playing.
edit - also for example dudes head/top santa hat doesn't even really entirely fit? It is cut off, not sized entirely right. or just my visual error? Just don't see how this gets EIGHT full votes over some other options. Not bad, but 'sloppy' tbh..
![]()
edit - also sus that the alien and pikachu selected considering some of the CDT members that made up the 8.
Final answer is that the team voting on such things is too small. when a decision needs to be made of this caliber, community needs to be involved considering we are the ones that will be essentially voting on the final say anyways. how bad does it suck that the true winner is being snubbed and may not even be in the final 10 voting? CDT + others to equal a voting team of 8 is too small. Final thoughts. Final feedback.
@DSC @BlackBlasses
would also like to know what other methods have been done in the past that were mentioned in these comments above. I think better can be done, but there's no reason the voting prior to the final 10 shouldn't be expanded from 8 to a lot more. The small pool is just too biased, whether you guys on the inside want to admit to that or not. More people on the inside is better for the whole.![]()
Less 'dictatorship,' more 'democracy.'
1) Ridiculous that one participant should be able to recieve 4/10 entries - also after hearing this *same* person (unnamed) got 4/10 entries in a previous Summer event?
That's so weird. Its almost as if they were picked based off of somebodies skills and abilities, rather than just picking it because somebody submitted one.
None of the 4~ minis I submitted were chosen.
People vote for what they like.

