Ok so it was quite an interesting chat with the objection commission. They were really understanding about the situation despite it being such a complicated situation for outsiders. All they do is give advice to the 'court' though, as they are independent. The woman who represented the court was quite interesting. She kept pointing towards the stack of papers she had with her and no matter what the commission asked here she kept saying "Based on the evidence we've been presented with our POV is set in stone". According to her I had like 16 accounts I've been handling donations with (which were in fact my RS mules to avoid bans) and she said that I was busy 24-hours a week with those donations for which I could've charged for, when I've chosen not to. According to her my second request for the insurance was also not yet accepted, but still pending, while we've been literally presented with the options to A) quit all online trading activities and get the insurance or B) the opposite. We've chosen for A and for as far we can recall our second request was accepted. If our second request is truely denied we most likely will sue them in an actual law court. Though we're not getting ahead of ourselves, right now we've got about 3 weeks till the objection commission gives their advice and 6 weeks till the 'court' here will make their decision, which is most likely not in my favor since no matter what the commission advices, they can still do whatever they please with my request.













































































































