But fucking really

SuF · Mar 22, 2015

Meteor said:
I feel like a lot of the threads in SFA right now are better suited for the General Discussion section.

Like which ones?

Meteor · Mar 22, 2015

SuF said:
Like which ones?

"Is depression self inflicted"
"Are we a special kind of generation (people)?"
"School: How much do we really learn?"
"FCC Approves Net Neutrality Rules For Open Internet"
"Are computer games ruining peoples lives?"
"Is money a defining factor in happiness?"

Actually, looking at the general discussion section right now, I don't think they are suited for that section either but I don't feel like they belong in SFA..idk

SuF · Mar 22, 2015

Meteor said:
"Is depression self inflicted"
"Are we a special kind of generation (people)?"
"School: How much do we really learn?"
"FCC Approves Net Neutrality Rules For Open Internet"
"Are computer games ruining peoples lives?"
"Is money a defining factor in happiness?"

Actually, looking at the general discussion section right now, I don't think they are suited for that section either but I don't feel like they belong in SFA..idk

Depression one is just silly since its proved to not be. Should be locked.
Generation is dumb but it could have some decent discussion. Depends on the posts if it should be locked.
Third should be in general discussion.
Games are a fine discussion point.
Fifth is dumb in my opinion but again depends on the posts.

Nick · Mar 22, 2015

Why not apply for SFA moderator, SuF? I know that used to be a thing. Ask for a staff vote? If you see an issue be the one to try and fix it.

S · Mar 22, 2015

I'd do it if I had perms.

SuF · Mar 22, 2015

Nick said:
Why not apply for SFA moderator, SuF? I know that used to be a thing. Ask for a staff vote? If you see an issue be the one to try and fix it.

The staff no likey me.

Wonderland · Mar 22, 2015

Firstly, the forum rules need to be reformed to accept all intelligent discussions. This would boost the activity of the forum significantly.

Secondly, the limitation should be set to Active Members (100 post count). I'd raise it to 250, but 100 seems reasonable.

Lastly, no need to act like you have HPD. It's not like you frequently post in the section at all. You just come on every other day to complain about systematic issues that you don't participate with/in.

SuF · Mar 22, 2015

Ghast said:
Firstly, the forum rules need to be reformed to accept all intelligent discussions. This would boost the activity of the forum significantly.

Secondly, the limitation should be set to Active Members (100 post count). I'd raise it to 250, but 100 seems reasonable.

Lastly, no need to act like you have HPD. It's not like you frequently post in the section at all. You just come on every other day to complain about systematic issues that you don't participate with/in.

I post there now and then. It should get cleaned up even so.

Xier0 · Mar 22, 2015

SuF said:
The staff no likey me.

¯\_(&#12484

_/¯

Ghast said:
Firstly, the forum rules need to be reformed to accept all intelligent discussions. This would boost the activity of the forum significantly.

Secondly, the limitation should be set to Active Members (100 post count). I'd raise it to 250, but 100 seems reasonable.

Lastly, no need to act like you have HPD. It's not like you frequently post in the section at all. You just come on every other day to complain about systematic issues that you don't participate with/in.

I'm against a postcount requirement for SFA. If someone wants to legitimately discuss important issues, there's no reason that they should be required to post 25-100 times elsewhere. The problem is the lack of moderation that enforces the strict rules of the section, having a postcount requirement is just bailing water instead of plugging the leak.

SuF · Mar 22, 2015

Xier0 said:
¯\_(&#12484_/¯

I'm against a postcount requirement for SFA. If someone wants to legitimately discuss important issues, there's no reason that they should be required to post 25-100 times elsewhere. The problem is the lack of moderation that enforces the strict rules of the section, having a postcount requirement is just bailing water instead of plugging the leak.

I would tend to agree with this. If someone is watching it, there shouldn't be a problem.

R · Mar 23, 2015

Went through a bunch and deleted some of the posts that're lacking any back-up. Feel free to PM me any specific threads/posts/users you feel are getting trashy.