I've been told multiple times I have to make a thread to get someone banned. Me being a 12 year old member without any history of scamming, or lying to staff and some might say a pretty good track record for all the years I've been here could not make one. Yet someone who has had 20+ scam reports, and known as a liar/ twisting things into his favor was able to make one.
I was banned unfairly because staff "team" took up a private report but when it was mentioned to other staff members the ban got reversed. I sat for close to a week still banned for it because staff was not on the same page because it was handled privately. I asked and bothered a few times to be unbanned. Yet no one would unban me. If this was a report thread made on Sythe.org I feel none of this would have even happened.
If not ALL members can make a private report then why can some? Why are some reports even handled privately? Why are certain staff members advocating and acting as lawyers for someone when their whole purpose is to bring transparency, isn't this why the rule for making private reports disallowed made in the first place?
"Going forward we will not be allowing private reports. Staff will not adjudicate cases in private. If there is sensitive information such as RSNs/names/ID's/Etc you can reply to your thread with the information and delete the post to hide them."
Do not make edit history/private reports
Private reports should not be handled at all. The person being accused of something may not even know what was going on to properly defend themselves. It causes problems and is more time consuming for staff to get on the same page. I feel a good reason why some are made private is because the person reporting knows how that certain staff member is going to handle it. I've seen multiple times on reports where people ask for certain staff members to handle it and they are told that they can't request that. So why are private reports even handled?
I was banned unfairly because staff "team" took up a private report but when it was mentioned to other staff members the ban got reversed. I sat for close to a week still banned for it because staff was not on the same page because it was handled privately. I asked and bothered a few times to be unbanned. Yet no one would unban me. If this was a report thread made on Sythe.org I feel none of this would have even happened.
If not ALL members can make a private report then why can some? Why are some reports even handled privately? Why are certain staff members advocating and acting as lawyers for someone when their whole purpose is to bring transparency, isn't this why the rule for making private reports disallowed made in the first place?
"Going forward we will not be allowing private reports. Staff will not adjudicate cases in private. If there is sensitive information such as RSNs/names/ID's/Etc you can reply to your thread with the information and delete the post to hide them."
Do not make edit history/private reports
Private reports should not be handled at all. The person being accused of something may not even know what was going on to properly defend themselves. It causes problems and is more time consuming for staff to get on the same page. I feel a good reason why some are made private is because the person reporting knows how that certain staff member is going to handle it. I've seen multiple times on reports where people ask for certain staff members to handle it and they are told that they can't request that. So why are private reports even handled?









































































