SidStudios
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 201
Internet Explorer is a 100 times better than Firefox. While I am writing this argument, please note that I am not using a 5 GHz Dual Core computer with 2 GB of RAM and 1 GB of video memory. I’m using a normal, Toshiba, laptop. I’m not talking about the new, cheesy “Internet Explorer 7″, I’m referring to Internet Explorer 6.
To start things off, Firefox takes too long to start up. On the other hand, on my ordinary computer, when I hit the Quick Launch button for Internet Explorer, it instantly appears! I seriously can’t wait for 20 seconds for, not an imaging program, but a Web-browser to show up.
Secondly, people say that Firefox has less system requirements than Internet Explorer. I have to call bullshit on that.
Lets see… the Mozilla Firefox requirements are as follows:
Firefox Minimum Hardware
233 MHz CPU
64 MB of RAM
50 MB of free disk space
Windows 98
…and now for the Internet Explorer requirements:
Internet Explorer Minimum Hardware:
486/66 MHz CPU
16 MB of RAM
11.5 MB of free disk space
Windows 98
Strange, isn’t it? Firefox needing more requirements than Internet Explorer? ZOMG!
I hate to say it, but face it. Mozilla Firefox sucks. Every poor misguided fool is going to regret using it, one day. I suggest that everyone ditches that shit and goes for either Internet Explorer or Opera (if they want correct CSS displaying in their browsers).
I’m not saying Internet Explorer is good. I’m just saying that Internet Explorer beats Firefox at starting up, and system requirements. It freezes quite a lot, too, just like Internet Explorer. Extensions mean nothing, and neither do themes.
Extensions being safe? I think not.
Over 90 extensions have been found to collect data and uniquely identifying users without notifying them.
A highly critical vulnerability in the Firebug extension allows remote exploitation that can lead to system compromise.
A vulnerability in the Fizzle extension can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion attacks.
A vulnerability in older versions of the Greasemonkey extension can be exploited by malicious people to disclose sensitive information by disclosing the contents of arbitrary local files and list the contents of arbitrary local directories.
A vulnerability in older versions of the IE Tab extension allows remote user-complicit attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash).
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Sage extension can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks.
A highly critical vulnerability in the Wizz RSS News Reader extension allows remote exploitation that can lead to system compromise.
The sources include:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=500994
http://secunia.com/advisories/24743/
http://secunia.com/advisories/24654
http://secunia.com/advisories/16128/
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-2538
http://secunia.com/product/11907/?task=advisories
http://secunia.com/advisories/24913/
Credits: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyths.html
To start things off, Firefox takes too long to start up. On the other hand, on my ordinary computer, when I hit the Quick Launch button for Internet Explorer, it instantly appears! I seriously can’t wait for 20 seconds for, not an imaging program, but a Web-browser to show up.
Secondly, people say that Firefox has less system requirements than Internet Explorer. I have to call bullshit on that.
Lets see… the Mozilla Firefox requirements are as follows:
Firefox Minimum Hardware
233 MHz CPU
64 MB of RAM
50 MB of free disk space
Windows 98
…and now for the Internet Explorer requirements:
Internet Explorer Minimum Hardware:
486/66 MHz CPU
16 MB of RAM
11.5 MB of free disk space
Windows 98
Strange, isn’t it? Firefox needing more requirements than Internet Explorer? ZOMG!
I hate to say it, but face it. Mozilla Firefox sucks. Every poor misguided fool is going to regret using it, one day. I suggest that everyone ditches that shit and goes for either Internet Explorer or Opera (if they want correct CSS displaying in their browsers).
I’m not saying Internet Explorer is good. I’m just saying that Internet Explorer beats Firefox at starting up, and system requirements. It freezes quite a lot, too, just like Internet Explorer. Extensions mean nothing, and neither do themes.
Extensions being safe? I think not.
Over 90 extensions have been found to collect data and uniquely identifying users without notifying them.
A highly critical vulnerability in the Firebug extension allows remote exploitation that can lead to system compromise.
A vulnerability in the Fizzle extension can be exploited by malicious people to conduct script insertion attacks.
A vulnerability in older versions of the Greasemonkey extension can be exploited by malicious people to disclose sensitive information by disclosing the contents of arbitrary local files and list the contents of arbitrary local directories.
A vulnerability in older versions of the IE Tab extension allows remote user-complicit attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash).
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Sage extension can be exploited by malicious people to conduct cross-site scripting attacks.
A highly critical vulnerability in the Wizz RSS News Reader extension allows remote exploitation that can lead to system compromise.
The sources include:
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=500994
http://secunia.com/advisories/24743/
http://secunia.com/advisories/24654
http://secunia.com/advisories/16128/
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2006-2538
http://secunia.com/product/11907/?task=advisories
http://secunia.com/advisories/24913/
Credits: http://mywebpages.comcast.net/SupportCD/FirefoxMyths.html




