9/11: Planned by the Gov't? Serious posts only.

I'm surprised naive questions like this actually exists.

 

I can say, that I'm 98% sure the American Government did not stage the 9/11 bombing.

This is the 21st century, not the 1500s. I'd like to think attrocities like this in Western countries don't occur as much as they once did.

 

Can't agree with you more ^_^ . If the government had just let it go after a month or 2 then we wouldn't have to deal with any war in Iraq or with any conspiracy theories along the lines of that.

 

There's a difference between basing your beliefs on mere cynicism and speculation, and basing them on fact and solid evidence.

COINCIDENCE IS NEVER PROOF

 

I watched a very similar documentary that is very illegal apparently. It stated that the plane used was a government made plane that was supposed to explode on impact.

 

Mind to share the link?

 

Alright, so basically about the bomb theory.

When you watch certain videos it slows down just before the plane crashes into the buildings, you can see just in front that the building is already exploding.

Secondly how is a building to explode when a plane hits it? Unless there are explosives in the building, or in the plane. Even then, why would the building start to explode BEFORE the plane hits it.

Another strange point is, it may not be too big of a deal but it shows that bush lied about a few things.

Bush originally claimed that he heard about the second plane hitting the building when he was visiting a classroom. Later on he told the press he seen the FIRST plane on television.
Which was never air on television.

Source:

Which makes you wonder, did they video tape it and not release the tape?

 

You do some research instead of questioning absolutely everything I say. I'm giving points for people to look up themselves if they are interested in the subject. Do you expect me to write essays in detail to educate people like you who don't have the slightest clue about the circumstances around 911? No thanks, ever heard of Google?

Show me that what I'm saying is wrong and i'll happily debate it with you...

 

Please just leave this thread now, it's waaay over your head. The guy you quoted was being sarcastic and he hit the nail on the head with his comment. We can't let 911 be forgotten until ALL the mysteries surrounding it are cleared up.. otherwise you allow the government to do what it likes and if it gets away with this then you can be sure as hell it will happen again.

 

Thank you, for clearing this up for me.

 

You can't have solid evidence in a GOVERNMENT COVER UP.. duh..

The thermite found in the bottom of 3 buildings, Bush meeting the Bin Laden's a week before 911, Bush talking about the second plane that hadn't even crashed yet, the explosions heard by ALL the people in the vicinity (check the Sky news video), the fact that Bin Laden was almost caught in Bora Bora but the army were told to only send a few troops up the mountain and keep the rest on the ground = the difference between catching him and NOT. The fact that NORAD made a lot of "co-incidental" mistakes on that day which lead to the planes going through unnoticed (ignored). The fact that troops were deployed to Afghanistan a month before 911..

The American & British empire grew through imperialism.. 911 is nothing compared to what has happened in the past. If you doubt that Governments of the UK/US could do that then you simply don't know enough/anything about how we got to where we are today.

 

Can you link me to the Sky news video?

NORAD's mistakes were not "co-incidental". This was an unprecedented event and there was no protocol for how to react in a situation like this. Not only that, but the reason it took the planes went unnoticed for so long, was because the hijackers turned off the planes' transponders, thus making it extremely difficult to locate the planes. At the time of the hijacking, there were over 4,000 planes in the skies over the US.

On the thermate reaction
(as much as I hate citing yt videos as sources, this one sums it all up very nicely):

 

i agree 100% with fire. i have been to iraq and i see what happens there.

iraq is convenient to attack because it is small and weak. best country to take oil from. why are there 5 MILLION orphans in iraq at the moment (35% of the ENTIRE population of children) and only 123,000 orphans in the US which is much, much larger than iraq.

 

I wasn't aware that the orphans were the ones fighting against the US.

 

Whoever did 9/11, whether it was the Government, or the Terrorists or maybe someone else entirely. We'll never know for sure who did it, however there is one thing we know for certain: It was planned.

 

LOL. I was being just as sarcastic as he was. that's what the sarcastic face(^_^) is for.
Actually, there is a flaw in your non-sarcastic logic. If nobody remembers, then the government can't twist people to it's will because of it. In fact, the government Is doing what it likes with 9/11 BECAUSE everybody remembers.

 

I'm being completely serious when I say anyone who thinks 9/11 was a plot by the government is fucking retarded. I mean seriously? What would the American government gain by sabotaging it's own trade center?

Makes no fucking sense to me, still don't understand why people are still talking about it 10 years after the fact.

 

Think about it. The richest people in the world have the most power.. the bankers gain from going to war so they're paying off the politicans. Furthermore, the politicans involved in securing the oil in the Gulf countries will be lining their pockets.

Bush had an oil business in Texas and his grandfather is connected to the oil business aswell. Go do some research on him, he's a dodgy fucker!

 

Larry Silverstein bought the WTC a few months before it got hit and made $1.2 billion off of it. That's one reason.

 

Most of the evidence is poor because its based on half truths and not actully based on solid facts which leaves room for dobt. I belive it was terroists as there would of been too many people to be involved in the cover up for example I looked at a programme and they said it would be 3000 people to cover it up.

Now going on that someone would of said something by now I am sure.