The poll should say 'was 9/11 planned by the USA government'.
I'm unsure of if I'm allowed to post about this, or whether it is considered Intelligent, but ever since it happened I have always been curious. I have always believed it to be a conspiracy, which may offend many people but this is my view. I know it's hard to believe anybody could have the evil inside them to actually plan something like this, but in my opinion theres alot of evidence to suggest this is true. Feel free to add any evidence to this thread to support it being a conspiracy, or to add your views of why you believe it was just a terrorism act.
One factor I find where wierd is that it's 9/11, which coincidentally is the number for the American emergency services. This could be planned by terrorists as an ironic act, or maybe not, I don't know.
When the plaes hit the twin towers, in the videos you see, you will notice a series of explosions happening all the way down the building. These begin before the towers are actually hit, and continue at regular intervals, which would suggest to me it was a controlled demolition.
When a plane is reported to have flown off course, it would usually be shot down by fighter jets. Coincidentally, the fighter jets deployed flew the wrong way meaning they couldn't shoot the plane down...incompetence or planned?
In the case that the jets cannot shoot the plane down, grounded troops would then be called in to shoot it down, which didn;t happen.Why?
To the best of my knowledge, I believe Boing 747's can also be controlled from the ground, and not only by the pilot, therefore meaning it should have been directed away from the towers?
The Hexagon was also hit, but the hole left in the building was not large enough to suggest a 747 could have hit it since the wing span on a 747 is greater than the diameter of the hole left. Also, despite having cameras all round the Hexagon, footage was only released from 1 camera which records in frames, therefore doesn't show what actually hit the pentagon. From the frames you see the front of a plane, then next the explosion, nothing inbetween. On the frame that shows the front of the plane, it has a pointed nose, which doesn't esemble a 747's nose in anyway.
I don't know of any proof that shows Iraq did actually have weapons of mass destruction. I could be very wrong here but I'm gioing on what I know. And was it just coincidence that they had a huge amount of oil worth an extremely large amount of money at the time on invasion?
Thats all from me for now, anything that will be benefitial to the thread (evidence to support whether it was planned or not) will be added to the first post.
I have taken my time to write this because I am generally curious about this subject, and would like opinions on it. Please do not waste your time flaming me, or being disrespectful towards those who passed in this event.
I'm unsure of if I'm allowed to post about this, or whether it is considered Intelligent, but ever since it happened I have always been curious. I have always believed it to be a conspiracy, which may offend many people but this is my view. I know it's hard to believe anybody could have the evil inside them to actually plan something like this, but in my opinion theres alot of evidence to suggest this is true. Feel free to add any evidence to this thread to support it being a conspiracy, or to add your views of why you believe it was just a terrorism act.
One factor I find where wierd is that it's 9/11, which coincidentally is the number for the American emergency services. This could be planned by terrorists as an ironic act, or maybe not, I don't know.
When the plaes hit the twin towers, in the videos you see, you will notice a series of explosions happening all the way down the building. These begin before the towers are actually hit, and continue at regular intervals, which would suggest to me it was a controlled demolition.
When a plane is reported to have flown off course, it would usually be shot down by fighter jets. Coincidentally, the fighter jets deployed flew the wrong way meaning they couldn't shoot the plane down...incompetence or planned?
In the case that the jets cannot shoot the plane down, grounded troops would then be called in to shoot it down, which didn;t happen.Why?
To the best of my knowledge, I believe Boing 747's can also be controlled from the ground, and not only by the pilot, therefore meaning it should have been directed away from the towers?
The Hexagon was also hit, but the hole left in the building was not large enough to suggest a 747 could have hit it since the wing span on a 747 is greater than the diameter of the hole left. Also, despite having cameras all round the Hexagon, footage was only released from 1 camera which records in frames, therefore doesn't show what actually hit the pentagon. From the frames you see the front of a plane, then next the explosion, nothing inbetween. On the frame that shows the front of the plane, it has a pointed nose, which doesn't esemble a 747's nose in anyway.
I don't know of any proof that shows Iraq did actually have weapons of mass destruction. I could be very wrong here but I'm gioing on what I know. And was it just coincidence that they had a huge amount of oil worth an extremely large amount of money at the time on invasion?
Thats all from me for now, anything that will be benefitial to the thread (evidence to support whether it was planned or not) will be added to the first post.
I have taken my time to write this because I am generally curious about this subject, and would like opinions on it. Please do not waste your time flaming me, or being disrespectful towards those who passed in this event.
,
, True. Some people just can't handle the truth.
